Long Road, Right Destination: Vols in the Gator Bowl

(furiously deletes 700 words on the Music City Bowl)

Actually, let me say this: Nashville’s bowl runs a good show. I went in 2010 and really enjoyed it (until the end, of course). I think it’s good for the state to have the Music City Bowl do well. And there are seasons in rebuild mode when it really isn’t a bad destination for the Vols, like 2010.

That just wasn’t the case when the Gator Bowl was a realistic possibility, which it has been since Tennessee beat South Carolina, or a rightful one, which it has been since Tennessee finished a 6-1 run to end the regular season.

And now, after much deliberation and plenty of false starts:

https://twitter.com/Vol_Football/status/1203789190325919744

Here’s what I wrote when it looked like Nashville:

The Music City Bowl is not as prestigious as the Gator Bowl, full stop. It may be more desirable to individual fans depending on where you live, it may pay a little more, and it may create a nice recruiting setup in the mid-state. And a bowl can change its own fate – see the Peach Bowl, once a sign of a disappointing season at UT, now a New Year’s Six bowl – and perhaps Nashville will earn that reputation. None of that changes the prestige of January vs December 30, or the fact that Nashville’s bowl is 21 years old and Jacksonville’s has been played since the end of World War II.

It looked like the Vols were just going to be on the wrong side of bad luck. There’s no argument for Kentucky as a more deserving or desirable option than Tennessee in a vacuum. But in 2019, circumstances appeared to be working for the Cats and against the Vols. The Gator Bowl took an ACC team three years in a row and was contractually obligated, whatever that’s worth, to take a Big Ten team. Because of the final College Football Playoff rankings, Indiana was the best available option. In any other year of the last six, Indiana and Kentucky play in Nashville. But with the Music City obligated to an ACC team on the other half of their deal with Jacksonville, and Louisville being a good fit there…we didn’t have to like Nashville, but it at least made sense.

The Vols also just missed the Outback Bowl by 10-3 Wisconsin staying at #8 in the final College Football Playoff poll and Penn State staying ahead of an Auburn team that beat Oregon and Alabama. If the New Year’s Six used the AP poll instead, #9 Auburn would be in the Cotton Bowl, Alabama in the Citrus Bowl, and the Vols in the Outback Bowl. Instead, we have three Big Ten teams in the New Year’s Six and the SEC’s teams going down a peg.

But the Vols didn’t fall any further than that, earning the January bid to Jacksonville at the 11th hour and 58th minute. And here’s something we can say with greater certainty now: even if the Vols beat Georgia State and BYU to open the year, they’re probably still playing Indiana in the Gator Bowl. Tennessee would be ranked, but still in the Group of Six and still less deserving than Auburn. You’d always prefer to be 9-3 than 7-5, but perhaps the Vols learned a few things along the way this season that will prove to be more valuable than a pair of early escapes would’ve revealed.

Also: now we’re in-between two scenarios. The Outback Bowl was desirable not just for its own prestige, but a shot at a ranked opponent like Minnesota. Tennessee is hot, and did beat three bowl-bound teams plus 6-6 Missouri in this run. But the Vols only faced three ranked teams this season. Via the media guide, that hasn’t happened to Tennessee since 2003 (#17 Florida, #8 Georgia, #6 Miami). Tennessee would’ve been an underdog to the Golden Gophers by around eight points in SP+. It’s a bigger ask on a question this team hasn’t answered yet.

On the other hand, play Louisville in the Music City, and you’re likely a big favorite (around -10 in SP+). Given what our friends from Kentucky just did to them, you have little to gain here.

Instead, it’s Indiana. The name doesn’t do much traditionally in football, but the 8-4 Hoosiers would be a four-point favorite in SP+. It’s an also receiving votes bowl in the Coaches’ Poll; a great performance from either team could earn them a ranked finish.

It’s not a huge opportunity to level up like the Outback Bowl. But Indiana would likely be Tennessee’s best win this season. It’s the right bowl, and the right opportunity.

And it’s January, in primetime, the only game happening on the evening of January 2. This Tennessee team, led by its seniors, has given the program hope when it seemed furthest away. They can be forever tied to a turnaround if the Vols to follow in the 2020’s continue down this path. The Gator Bowl can be a bridge. I’m thrilled to see if they can cross it.

See you in the new year.

Tennessee Football: Why Where We Are Feels Different

With apologies to Peaches & Herb, the theme to Tennessee’s 2019 football season could be sung to the tune of the duo’s “Reunited” song:

“Me-di-oc-re and it feels so gooooooood!”

Indeed, rarely has a season so far below UT’s lofty historical standards felt like such a step forward. The Vols are 7-5 and likely headed either to Jacksonville’s Gator Bowl or Nashville’s Music City Bowl, but the excitement buzzing around the fan base would make you think the Vols leapt to 9-3 in Jeremy Pruitt’s second full season.

Part of the reason, of course, is UT actually SHOULD BE 9-3, had it not been for a debacle of a season-opening loss to Georgia State that was arguably the worst in program history and another sleepwalking fest that ended with Alontae Taylor getting lost against BYU on a prayer pass, sending a game into overtime the Vols ultimately lost and fell to 0-2. (It’s a start that’s keeping a lot of us from jumping 100 percent on board, too…)

Part of the reason is the Vols rallying to win five consecutive games to end the season and six of their final seven, with the only setback being a referee-aided, competitive loss to Alabama in Tuscaloosa.

Both of those are good enough reasons to be okay with a Season 2 Step Forward. But here’s the real reason we all should be cautiously optimistic:

The development is real.

Not since the strides in Lane Kiffin’s lone 2009 season looked so much more promising for the future than the growth the Vols have witnessed this year. Not only were there upperclassmen who’ve shown no signs of life blossom into difference-makers as the season matured, the freshman class has produced arguably more impact guys than any since Butch Jones’ 2014 class. That group of players was loaded, though it largely fell apart throughout his tenure, leading to guys leaving, getting injured or failing to develop.

Could those things happen under Pruitt? Sure. We’re not fortune tellers, after all. But the improvement of the upperclassmen this year is an indicator it won’t happen. He was a proven developer of players as a coordinator during successful stops at Alabama, Florida State and Georgia, and he has surrounded himself with expensive assistants who’ve had success at multiple stops, as well. Those who aren’t producing in the coaching ranks or in recruiting are getting demoted or heading elsewhere.

Pruitt seems determined to make this work, and athletic director Phil Fulmer is giving him the resources with which to work.

When you combine the development with the talent Pruitt has been able to compile, that could be a winning formula for the Vols to get “back,” even though it’s certainly premature to say they’re “back” right now. A stellar end to the 2020 recruiting class is necessary, and another step forward next year could go a long way in solidifying Tennessee’s return. All the Vols did, really, this year is re-emerge ahead of several mediocre-to-bad programs they’ve always been better than. So, while that was a necessary step, it does nothing to help you gain ground on the Alabamas, Georgias and Floridas of the world.

That comes later. For now, we have to look at the overall ’19 body of work and try to glean reasons for excitement. Here are a few:

  1. Nigel Warrior’s turnaround: Just how remarkable was the Tennessee senior safety’s season? He went from being a maligned player whose career was written off as late as this year’s Florida game to being named a Pro Football Focus Honorable Mention All-American. Pruitt is known for developing defensive backs, and that’s DC Derrick Ansley’s specialty, too. The light came on in a big way for Warrior, and as we saw positives from other safeties like true freshman Jaylen “Tank” McCullough and Theo Jackson, there’s plenty of reason for excitement moving forward. Toss in Shawn Shamburger going from the doghouse to the penthouse, and it’s obvious the Vols can generate some quality burn out of guys who looked like burned scholarships. Did you ever think a guy like, say, Kenneth George Jr. would blossom into a quality SEC cornerback who shut receivers down at times? Me neither. But he has. That’s coaching and development, folks.
  2. The Best Got Better: Warrior is just the poster child for improvement, but one thing to look at as another positive is how much Tennessee’s top-echelon players carried this year’s team. Does it suck they’ll be gone next year? Yes. But some of the Jones recruits who were big parts of bad teams got to be big parts of better teams this year, and they earned our adoration in the process. Jauan Jennings came back from injuries and even being off the team to become near-immortal, Daniel Bituli was a hard-hitting star all year, Marquez Callaway made big play after big play, Darrell Taylor was among the SEC’s sack leaders, and Trey Smith got a huge assist from UT’s medical staff to return from his blood clots issue and become one of the league’s top offensive linemen. You can say all these guys were recruits of the previous regime and try not to give the Pruitt staff credit for this, but this group went from being on a team full of problems to part of a solution. They got to go out winners.
  3. A Rejuvenated Rush: The numbers aren’t a ton different from a season ago, but the Vols went from 11th in the league with 25 sacks in 2018 to fourth with 30 sacks this year. In scoring defense, UT went from 12th (27.9) a season ago to seventh this year (21.7). But over the last half of the season, those numbers soared. Did the competition worsen? Yes, but Alabama’s competition was awful all year and the Tide don’t have any asterisks by their name, huh? If you can’t get excited about what Tennessee did to generate a pass rush this year, you don’t know football. It’s still not good enough, but it got much, much better. Besides Taylor, Pruitt seemed to dial up that Shamburger corner blitz at opportune times all season. Then, you’ve got guys like Kivon Bennett and Deandre Johnson, who blossomed into excellent situational players for UT. When you add elite freshmen like Quavaris Crouch and Roman Harrison and their potential to get after the quarterback, you’ve got reasons to be excited about the future. Beyond those guys, there appear to be quality players across the DL with the development of players such as Darel Middleton, Matthew Butler, Kurott Garland, John Mincey, and LaTrell Bumphus. If Greg Emerson and Elijah Simmons can develop, along with perhaps Kingston Harris, Tennessee could have the makings of a deep, versatile defensive line that can get after QBs from all angles.
  4. A Trench We Can All Dig: A year ago, I wanted to fire offensive line coach Will Friend. There. I said it. This year, the unit showed signs of life, improving in run blocking throughout the season despite lacking consistency. The group was pretty strong pass-blocking for the majority of the season, despite nearly getting Brian Maurer killed. Darnell Wright and Wanya Morris had growing pains, but they also showed flashes of the cornerstones they’re expected to be. Smith likely won’t return, but if he does, Tennessee could have one of the SEC’s top three lines next year. Brandon Kennedy getting a sixth year of eligibility would be massive, too. K’Rojhn Calbert was a stalwart at times this year, and the freshman duo of Chris Akporghene and Jackson Lampley have bright futures, too. UT has a bunch of potential road-grading maulers on the line, and this was a nice step-forward year. The group still has a ways to go.
  5. Help is on the Way: It’s easy to forget Tennessee’s best defensive lineman (Emmit Gooden) was lost for the year before the season started and Aubrey Solomon battled injuries all year but has another season of eligibility. There also are reports DeAngelo Gibbs (a Georgia transfer) was a terror to guard as a receiver this year playing against the scout team. With Jennings and Calloway gone, Gibbs should have a huge role as a redshirt junior. Speaking of redshirts, Brandon Johnson has another season after redshirting and delaying his senior year until next season when he can be a big factor. Could Pruitt be recruiting a bit better from a stars standpoint? Yeah, and I wish he’d do a little better instate. But you can’t fault the guy’s identification of quality players. Another Pruitt class will go a long way in getting “his” players in there, guys with attributes and skill sets he believes he can develop.
  6. So Many Potential Stars: How long has it been since Tennessee had a freshman linebacker as elite as Henry To’oto’o? Is he the best first-year ‘backer ever? Better than A.J. Johnson and Curt Maggitt? Better than Jerod Mayo? He may be. There’s no doubt he’ll be calling the defense next year, and he looks like a three-year player early on. Throw in Crouch and Harrison, and that’s a trio of difference-makers on the second level. Eric Gray showed everybody what he can do against Vanderbilt, and he has the type of speed and field vision you cannot teach. All he needs is an opportunity and an offensive line, and there are reasons to believe he’s going to have both. Wright and Morris are going to be special along the offensive front, even if both had freshman blunders. McCullough and Warren Burrell are going to be dynamic defensive backs. Maurer was going to be the future and the present at quarterback until he wasn’t, but there are certainly some moldable traits for the first-year signal-caller, and the future is bright, especially when the competition improves. There are others with plenty of potential, too.

When you look at Tennessee’s roster, there are still holes. But there are also bright spots of players who showed glimpses of potential. Are they role players, or can Pruitt and Co. build them into SEC players capable of helping Tennessee get back to the top of the SEC East? Only time will tell, but that’s the reason you should be excited about 7-5.

This is a mediocre team, but there are plenty of players on it who have the ability to be much better than that.

Why does the SPM like Georgia in the SEC Championship Game?

The LSU Tigers opened as a 7-point favorite over the Georgia Bulldogs in the SEC Championship Game this week, although several online sites had them as only a 3.5-point favorite. As of Friday morning, there seems to be a consensus of LSU -7. We posted earlier that the GRT Statsy Preview Machine likes Georgia to not only cover but win, but here’s the detail on how it arrived at that conclusion and whether I think it’s right.

If you’re new here and wondering what the SPM is and whether it’s reliable, check out this post.

Georgia Bulldogs vs. LSU Tigers

From the perspective of Georgia

Georgia’s points:

  • Georgia scoring offense for the season: 32.9
  • LSU scoring defense for the season: 22.1

The LSU scoring defense is most similar to the following prior Georgia opponent(s) (FBS only):

  • Tennessee 21.7
  • Texas A&M 22.7

Georgia scored only 19 points against Texas A&M but 43 against Tennessee. Based on that, the SPM estimates 30.9 points for Georgia against LSU.

LSU’s points:

  • Georgia scoring defense for the season: 10.4
  • LSU scoring offense for the season: 48.7

The LSU scoring offense is most similar to the following prior Georgia opponent(s):

  • Notre Dame 37.1
  • Auburn 34

Auburn scored only 14 points against Georgia, and Notre Dame got only 17. That’s under half of what those teams usually get, and based on that, the SPM estimates only 21.4 points for LSU against Georgia.

Estimated score: Georgia 30.9, LSU 21.4

From the perspective of LSU

LSU’s points:

  • LSU scoring offense for the season: 48.7
  • Georgia scoring defense for the season: 10.4

The Georgia scoring defense is most similar to the following prior LSU opponent(s) (FBS only):

  • Florida 14.4
  • Auburn 18.6

LSU scored 23 points against Auburn and 42 against Florida, nearly triple against the Gators, but only slightly more than what the Tigers usually allow. Based on that, the SPM estimates 20.5 points for LSU against Georgia.

Georgia’s points:

  • LSU scoring defense for the season: 22.1
  • Georgia scoring offense for the season: 32.9

The Georgia scoring offense is most similar to the following prior LSU opponent(s):

  • Florida 33
  • Auburn 34

Auburn scored 20 against LSU, and Florida got 28. Based on that, the SPM estimates 23.7 points for Georgia against LSU.

Estimated score: LSU 20.5, Georgia 23.7

SPM Final Estimates

Throw it in, cook it up, take a peek:

SPM Final estimated score: Georgia 27.3, LSU 21

SPM Final estimated spread: Georgia -6.3

Difference between the SPM and the current spread: 13.3

That difference between the SPM and the current spread makes this game one of the SPM’s favorites this week.

Eyeball adjustments

I’m uncomfortable with some of the volatility in the comps. For example, from Georgia’s perspective, LSU’s scoring defense is nearly identical to both Tennessee’s and Texas A&M’s, but Georgia got 43 against Tennessee and only 19 against A&M. I feel like A&M has pretty much been the same team all year, but the Vols have improved since they played Georgia, and Georgia’s offense seems to have regressed a bit. Basically, I think the estimate for Georgia’s points from Georgia’s perspective of 30.9 is a bit high. I’m thinking more like 24.

The same can be said of LSU’s points from LSU’s perspective. Georgia’s defense is not only much better than the two closest comps of Florida and Auburn, LSU’s results against those comps vary greatly, getting only slightly more against Auburn than what the Tigers usually give up but nearly triple against the Gators of what they usually give up. If Florida is a different team now than it was when those results were posted, then I think LSU’s estimated points of 20.5 might be a bit high as well. On the other hand, LSU’s offense has the feel of a juggernaut, so despite all of that, I’m inclined think that maybe it has that one pegged.

So, my eyeball-adjusted prediction is Georgia 24, LSU 21. I don’t like Georgia as much as the SPM does, but I still like them to not only cover but win outright.

Other predictions from other systems

As I said before, LSU opened as 7-point favorites from most sources, and those that had it there stayed there while the other sites adjusted to get there. With an over/under of 55 or so, that translates to something like LSU 31, Georgia 24.

Bill Connelly’s SP+ likes LSU 29-26, and gives the Tigers a 56% chance of winning.

ESPN’s FPI gives LSU a 55.7% chance of winning.

Bottom line

The SPM likes Georgia to not only cover the -7 spread, it likes the Bulldogs to win outright, and the game is actually in its “favorites” category. After eyeball adjustments, I don’t like them quite as much, but I do also like them to not only cover but win.

  • Vegas: LSU -7 (~LSU 31, Georgia 24)
  • SP+: LSU 29, Georgia 26 (doesn’t cover)
  • SPM: Georgia 27, LSU 21 (doesn’t cover)
  • Me: Georgia 24, LSU 21 (doesn’t cover)

What do y’all think?

SPM picks: Championship Week

The SPM was barely up over .500 last week, which is honestly pretty good for Rivalry Week, a notoriously difficult week to predict. Last week, the SPM went 33-31(51.56%) overall, 11-8 (57.89%) over the confidence threshold, and 10-4 (71.43%) on its favorites. (If you’re wondering whether those favorites numbers are different from those in this post, it’s because the numbers above compare to SP+ and therefore use the same spreads that SP+ uses, while the favorites that were posted last week were posted early and therefore used Vegas opening spreads. The SPM is trying to catch SP+, so when possible, we compare to the same spreads.)

For the season, the SPM is now 359-344 (51.07%) overall, 147-114 (56.32%) over the confidence threshold, and 90-52 (63.38%) for the favorites.

SP+ had a difficult time last week, going only 26-38 (41%) overall. One bad week doesn’t undo a terrific season, though, as it’s still sitting pretty at 54% over the entire season.

SPM favorite picks this week

There’s only a handful of games this week, and the SPM only likes two of them: (these are based on the same spreads SP+ is using):

What do y’all think?

Vols take care of business against Florida A&M, 72-43

Yesterday’s four-factors preview of the Tennessee-Florida A&M game suggested the following:

  1. Tennessee should both shoot well and keep A&M from shooting well.
  2. The game could provide the Vols an opportunity to improve their turnover numbers.
  3. Tennessee had huge advantages rebounding the ball on both sides of the court.
  4. The Vols should be able to get to the foul line a bit more than usual, and the Rattlers should get there no more than what is normal for them.

The score prediction (from KenPom) was Tennessee 79, Florida A&M 50. Vols by 29.

So, how’d they do?

  1. The Vols went 24-55 for 43.6% while holding the Rattlers to 16-45 for 35.6%. The team was cold from three, though, hitting only 3-16 (18.8%). That has to get better.
  2. Tennessee turned the ball over 15 times to A&M’s 20.
  3. The rebounding advantages showed up. Overall, it was 43-25, Vols. Tennessee had 27 defensive rebounds to FAMU’s 20 and 16 offensive rebounds to FAMU’s 5.
  4. Tennessee got to the foul line 28 times (and hit 21 of them). The Rattlers got there 16 times and hit 9 of them.

The score was 72-43, Vols by 29.

John Fulkerson led the way with 15 points, but five different players hit double figures, and Olivier Nkamhoua had a double-double with 11 points and 13 rebounds. Jordan Bowden struggled, scoring only 3 points and going only 1-7.

With that, the team extended its home winning streak to 31, the longest active home streak in Division I. Rick Barnes will be going for win number 700 when Memphis comes to town on December 14.

The Portal, the 25-Limit, and the Case for “Oversigning”

All season long, Coach Jeremy Pruitt lamented the fact that the Vols were well below the 85-scholarship limit.  Between preseason injuries, inseason departures, and redshirts, at times the Vols were operating with below even 70 scholarship players.  What he didn’t say was that the NCAA’s relatively recent restriction on enrolling more than 25 players in a given class makes it incredibly difficult to catch back up to that number even over time, putting programs who started well below 85 scholarships at an very large competitive disadvantage.  With the news earlier this week that two redshirt senior-to-be OL Ryan Johnson and Marcus Tatum are entering the transfer portal, the scholarship situation facing Tennessee came into even more focus.  It wasn’t that long ago that guys like them would make a leap in their final season, especially on the OL – how many Fulmer teams were built around OL who had stuck around, paid their dues, and were given a chance in their final season?  As it’s become so easy for players to transfer, especially for young men looking who have graduated and are simply for more playing time in their final year of eligibility like Johnson and Tatum, it’s a reasonable question to ask: How can anyone actually catch up?

In our look at Edge Rushers earlier in the week, we noted that the Vols have around 7 spots remaining in the class, but caveated that statement with the following question: “Will the Vols try and greyshirt someone like Darrion Williamson (ACL injury) or Will Albright to fit another player into the class?  Does Melvin McBride’s medical retirement give the Vols room to enroll 26 in this class?  Both are questions that the answers to will determine how many more spots there actually are.”  It should also be noted that Tennessee commitments WR Jimmy Calloway and OLB Jimari Butler are taking visits elsewhere, and Calloway particularly looks like a potential flight risk, so even the current number of 18 commitments (and therefore 7 spots) is a little tentative.

Looking at those specific situations above a little further, one can see how they each make sense:

*Williamson suffered an ACL injury in the fall.  Before even getting to the fact that he’s a relatively raw prospect to begin with, the injury itself makes it incredibly unlikely that he can meaningfully contribute in 2020 if he can physically get on the field at all.  Why start his eligibility clock now?  Instead, let him enroll in January 2021 and have his five years to play four start with the 2021 season.  That’s a win-win for both parties

*Albright is a Longsnapper, and as Longsnappers go he’s a great prospect as evidenced by his spot on the All-American Bowl roster.  Forgetting any argument about whether a program should use one of its precious 25 scholarships at that position (we’re neither for nor against, per se), the Vols will lose a steady senior in Riley Lovingood after the season and need someone to replace him immediately.  Is that something a freshman can do?  Again, not being knowledgeable enough about the intricacies of the position it’s tough to say, but what we do know is that Tennessee’s current roster lists two other LS’s – RS Senior-to be Jake Yelich (rated as a five-star LS by Chris Sailer Kicking/Rubio Long Snapping coming out of high school) and RS Sophomore-to be Matthew Salansky.  So Tennessee does have players who’ve been in the program that could potentially step in at least for 2020.  That would allow Albright to greyshirt and like Williamson start his 5-to-play-4 in 2021

*When it comes to McBride’s 2019 initial counter, there is just so much gray area here.  Further to the point about counters from 2019, however, Tennessee was by all accounts all set to sign longtime commitment Anthony Harris.  He would have had to have had a spot, and one would think that the fact that he did not enroll would mean that spot is now available.  So what Tennessee can roll over from 2019 is incredibly opaque

Again, all of this is speculation.  It’s likely no one outside of Pruitt and his compliance team knows the exact situation.  What we do know is that the existing 18 commitments collectively represent a large step forward in terms of depth and talent across the board for the program.  Even the most ardent “NegaVol” would be hard-pressed to find a commitment that doesn’t look like a really good prospect or, more importantly, a position group that doesn’t clearly look like it’s being improved.  There is a reason that despite having only those 18 commitments the class is ranked #20 nationally, with a clear path to being at worst in the Top 15 and even a “If things break perfectly” path to inside the Top 10.

What’s left for the staff to accomplish is filling as many needs as possible while leaving themselves wiggle room to go the Best Player Available route if necessary/possible.  How they plan on doing that beyond simply building as big of a board of top-shelf realistic options (which they have done and continue to do during the contact period) remains to be seen.  TE Darnell Washington has a spot, of that we are sure.  Do they take both ILBs Vai Kaho and Desmond Tisdol?  What would that, and the potential addition of RB Jabari Small, do for Len’neth Whitehead?  How many of DL Tyler Baron, Octavius Oxendine, Omari Thomas, Reginald Perry, and Nazir Stackhouse would they take if they could take ALL of them? What about the aforementioned Edge Rushers Morven Joseph and Khari Coleman, a group they’ve added former Ole Miss commitment and December 13th official visitor Jaqwondis Burns to all the while according to Volquest still pursuing former commitment BJ Ojulari?  How many Offensive Playmakers can they take, with QB/WR Jimmy Holiday along with Small, WR Ramon Henderson, and RB Zaquandre White – the latter three December 13th official visitors – firmly on the board and even WRs Rakim Jarrett and Thaiu Jones-Bell at least on the periphery?  Heck, even JUCO DB Emmanuel Appiah is scheduled to OV December 13th, too, and he’s a very promising prospect who also happens to be an EE.  Again, there are still needs across the roster, so it wouldn’t be unreasonable for Pruitt and his staff to just rank their board and go from there, positions be damned. 

Ultimately what we’re advocating is for Pruitt to use any means necessary to sign *as many of the above prospects as possible*.  Greenshirts, Greyshirts, Redshirts, Blueshirts (h/t: Dr. Seuss). Backcounting, frontloading, anything in between.  Even, frankly, borrowing from 2021.  Because right now, despite the strong classes of 2018 and 2019 and the incredible development of the players from prior classes that Pruitt and his staff have done, the program simply needs better talent and more of it.  And with the transfer portal changing the game and no other recourse to catch up scholarship-wise, it would behoove Tennessee to take advantage of as many loopholes and avenues as possible to replenish the roster.  They’ve done the work to put themselves in position to land – in a vacuum – all of the players above.  Now they should do whatever it takes to sign as many of them as they can.

Tennessee-Florida A&M four-factors preview: TCB

Here’s a look at the four factors numbers for Tennessee’s game tonight against Florida A&M. The conclusions are up front, and the details follow:

Summary and Score Prediction

The goals for the Vols:

  1. Make the most of their shooting advantages on both sides of the court.
  2. Make the most of their rebounding advantages on both sides of the court.
  3. Be aggressive and get to the foul line.
  4. Take care of business.

Prediction: Vols 79, A&M 50

Four Factors: Straight-Up

Effective FG%

  • Tennessee 51.2 (No. 110)
  • Florida A&M 39.3 (No. 347)

Prior opponents:

UNC Asheville54.341
VCU51117
Florida St.51118
Washington50.3133
Chattanooga48.5188
Murray St.48.1207
Alabama St.42.5327

Conclusion: To Tennessee, Florida A&M is most like Alabama State when it comes to Effective FG%.

Turnover %

  • Tennessee 20.1 (No. 201)
  • Florida A&M 22 (No. 296)

Prior opponents:

Chattanooga18.9135
Florida St.19.4164
VCU19.9190
Washington20.4216
Murray St.20.4218
UNC Asheville20.7232
Alabama St.24.3333

Conclusion: Again, A&M basically looks like Alabama State from a Turnover % perspective.

Offensive Rebound %

  • Tennessee 30.5 (No. 115)
  • Florida A&M 27.5 (No. 196)

Prior opponents:

Florida St.32.273
UNC Asheville31.489
Tennessee30.5115
VCU30126
Washington27.5198
Murray St.27.2201
Chattanooga25.5234
Alabama St.18.9343

Conclusion: Huh. These guys are rebounding as well as Washington. (But that’s not exactly as good as you might think it should be.)

Free Throw Rate

  • Tennessee 38.5 (No. 69)
  • Florida A&M 36.8 (No. 88)

Prior opponents:

Murray St.4225
Florida St.39.354
Washington3961
VCU36.889
UNC Asheville36.690
Alabama St.34125
Chattanooga24.7304

Conclusion: These guys are most like VCU and UNC Asheville when it comes to free throws.

Those are the straight-up comparisons of the teams’ respective averages in the four factors, but what about the fact that those numbers are impacted in any given game by the opponent?

Four Factors: Opponent impact

Effective FG%

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s EFG% is 51.2 (No. 110), and it will be going up against a defense that is 53.9 (No. 297).

When Florida A&M has the ball

A&M’s EFG% is 39.3 (No. 347), while Tennessee’s shooting defense is 41.4 (No. 12). Tennessee should make it pretty difficult for the Rattlers.

Conclusions

Expect Tennessee to both shoot well and make it really difficult for A&M to shoot well.

Turnover %

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee is struggling with a turnover % of 20.1 (No. 201). A&M’s defensive counterpart to this stat is 20.9 (No. 118).

When A&M has the ball

FAMU’s turnover % is 22 (No. 296), while’s Tennessee’s ability to force turnovers is 18.8 (No. 199).

Conclusions

Tennessee needs to get its turnovers straightened out, and the Rattlers may provide an opportunity to make up some ground there.

Offensive Rebounding %

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s OR% is 30.5 (No. 115), while A&M’s defense in that category is 37.3 (No. 348).

When FAMU has the ball

The Rattlers’ OR% is 27.5 (No. 196), while the Vols’ defense in that category is 23.4 (No. 41).

Conclusions

The Vols have a huge advantage in rebounding on both sides of the court.

Free Throw Rate

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s FT Rate is 38.5 (No. 69), while Florida A&M’s defense against that is 38.2 (No. 285).

When A&M has the ball

The Rattlers’ FT Rate is 36.8 (No. 88), while Tennessee’s defense against that is 25.9 (No. 72).

Conclusions

Tennessee is really good at getting to the foul line, and A&M is pretty generous in that regard. The other side is pretty much even, so although the Rattlers are used to getting to the foul line themselves, the Vols are pretty good at defending without fouling.

Summary and Score Prediction

The Vols appear to have big advantages in shooting, rebounding, and getting to the foul line, all of which should make this a fairly easy game for the good guys tonight.

The goals for the Vols:

  1. Make the most of their shooting advantages on both sides of the court.
  2. Make the most of their rebounding advantages on both sides of the court.
  3. Be aggressive and get to the foul line.
  4. Take care of business.

KenPom gives Tennessee a 99% chance of winning and puts the score at Tennessee 79, Florida A&M 50. The current line is Tennessee -30.

Go Vols.

Tennessee Bowl Projections: Playoff Poll Surprises and Simplifies

Here’s what we think after the release of the final College Football Playoff poll before the real thing on Sunday:

https://twitter.com/CFBPlayoff/status/1202018158338555906

Let’s start with the simple: if Ohio State, LSU, and Clemson win, they’re in. For Tennessee’s purposes, it may not matter if the committee chooses Utah or Oklahoma if they both win. But because Baylor is ranked six spots ahead of Oregon, it’s better for the Vols if Oklahoma earns the #4 spot.

That scenario would give you the top three and the Sooners in the playoff. The Sugar Bowl would take Georgia (assuming the Dawgs don’t drop below a Florida team they beat) and Baylor.

The Rose Bowl would take Utah and either Wisconsin or Penn State. Assuming a team that does not play this week will not jump another team that does not play this week, Florida has the advantage for the Orange Bowl by being ranked ahead of Penn State, and would probably play Virginia (if there are zero non-Clemson, non-Notre Dame ACC teams ranked in the final playoff poll, the Orange Bowl gets to pick itself, but Virginia is the most deserving no matter what happens against the Tigers).

From there, the Cotton Bowl will take the next-highest-ranked team. And this is where everything will get decided as far as Tennessee and the Outback Bowl: is that next-highest-ranked team Wisconsin or Auburn? Or, if the committee takes Utah over Oklahoma, is it Wisconsin, Auburn, or Baylor?

If it’s the Tigers, the Tua-less Tide go to Orlando, and Tennessee’s path to the Outback Bowl is clear. If Wisconsin is ranked ahead of Auburn in the final poll (or Baylor if the committee puts Utah in the playoff), Alabama and Auburn should split the Citrus and Outback, sending the Vols back to the Jacksonville conversation.

Also, if it’s Wisconsin, the Big Ten bowl opponents cycle up, meaning you’re not going to catch anything better than Indiana or an ACC trade-off in the Gator Bowl. If you want to see the Vols level up, it looks like that can only happen in Tampa now.

So, in order of what would be most helpful for Tennessee:

  • Ohio State blows out #8 Wisconsin enough for them to fall behind #11 Auburn in the final poll
  • The committee takes Oklahoma for its final playoff spot
  • Or, the committee takes Utah, and Oklahoma blows out #7 Baylor enough for them to fall behind #11 Auburn in the final poll (an odd scenario probably requiring Utah to simultaneously blow out Oregon)

You get that, you should get Tampa. The Athletic reported earlier today that the Citrus Bowl was locked in on Michigan, meaning Minnesota is still the most likely opponent in the Outback Bowl.

Do the Vols Have the Room (or Need) for Another Edge Rusher?

With around* 7 spots remaining to fill in the 2020 class, Tennessee has set itself up with a nice board on both offense and defense, and its existing 18 commitments collectively represent a step forward in terms of depth and talent across the board for the program.  What’s left for the staff to accomplish is filling as many needs as possible while leaving themselves wiggle room to go the Best Player Available route if necessary/possible.  At the same time they’ll need to keep all of their existing commitments, with the main focus on WR Jimmy Calloway (UK, OU, UGA in contention) and OLB Jimari Butler (Nebraska). 

At the specific position of Edge Rusher (OLB in a 3-4, DE in a 4-3), the aforementioned Butler is Tennessee’s only current commitment.  Theoretically, especially with the upcoming departure of senior Darrell Taylor, the Vols could use another prospect at the position.  To that end, the Vols hosted Kansas commitment Khari Coleman and FSU commitment Morven Joseph this past weekend on official visits.  Tennessee has been involved with both players since the summer, having them on campus for camp and offering them scholarships around that time.  Coleman is a New Orleans native who had an incredibly productive season and at around 6’1-6’2 and 210-215 pounds uses his speed around the edge as his calling card.  Joseph is a bit more physically imposing at 6’3 and 215-220 pounds and is also a more well-known prospect than Coleman, having formerly been a Florida commitment before flipping to the Seminoles over the summer. 

While Coleman came out of the weekend calling Tennessee his leader, Joseph was a bit more muted in his post-visit interviews although seemingly still being pretty impressed.  At the same time, both will be taking other visits, with Coleman scheduled to see TCU and then Vanderbilt before the Early Signing Period begins December 18th and Joseph set to see the Gators this coming weekend.  Therefore, there is no reason to think that Tennessee can definitely land either or both of these players should the staff decide to push.  What’s perhaps more pertinent is whether or not Tennessee truly needs either of them in this class – assuming Butler is solid – unless it were as a Best Player Available with a final spot.  With the emergence of junior-to-be Kivon Bennett over the course of the season and the continued development of true freshmen Quarvaris Crouch and Roman Harrison – all three of whom had a sack in Saturday’s season finale – there is perhaps a less immediate need for the 2020 season.  The team will also return senior-to-be Deandre Johnson, a solid contributor and certainly a rotational SEC player, along with Butler.  Commitments Martavius French and Bryson Eason, both of whom have played all over the field for their Memphis Whitehaven High School team including as pass rushers, could also figure into that mix both immediately in 2020 and also into the future.  Finally, Knoxville Catholic’s Tyler Baron, thought at this point to be a heavy lean to Tennessee, has the potential to give the Vols some immediate help on the edge in 2020 even if his future position is likely more as a true DL as his body fills out.

Tennessee 100% wants to add Baron along with DL Omari Thomas and Octavius Oxendine, and the Vols are at worst co-leaders for each of the three. DL Reggie Perry took an official visit to Tennessee this weekend as well and apparently made a huge move, and the Vols even got Georgia DL commitment Nazir Stackhouse on campus unofficially – Pruitt and Ansley will be in with him today, likely to try and see how serious Stackhouse really is and try and secure an OV.  They want at least one more ILB, with Vai Kaho, Desmond Tisdol, and Len’neth Whitehead (not a RB) all very much in play.  There is also speculation that Coach Pruitt would like to sign another DB, and JUCO Emmanuel Appiah is scheduled to officially visit the December 13th weekend.  TE Darnell Washington will have a spot reserved for him until his signed LOI is announced by another school.  And at least from this writer’s perspective the Vols could absolutely use at least one more playmaker, with ATHs Jimmy Holiday and Ramon Henderson, WRs Dee Beckwith and Jaylon Barden, and RB Jabari Small and Zaquandre White all in the mix (not to mention longshots Thaiu Jones-Bell and Rakim Jarrett).   Obviously Tennessee wouldn’t win out for all of these prospects whether it had the room or not.  The Vols are battling programs like Georgia, Alabama, Auburn, Florida and Notre Dame for many of them, and some of them are committed elsewhere for now.  But the fact that Tennessee is in the mix with such a number of high quality prospects with such a relatively low number of spots gives one a sense for the kinds of decisions that Pruitt and his staff are going to have to make.

Both Coleman and Joseph are high-quality prospects in their own right and one could absolutely make the case that there is a real need for Tennessee to add another Edge Rusher in this class, especially in a vacuum.  However, although Pruitt has gotten the program into a much better spot than it was when he arrived (through both recruiting and development) there are still multiple needs across the roster.  And this position does have a good (if not great, where it needs to be) blend of depth and talent.  Therefore it won’t be a surprise to see the Vols go either way on this question, but the view here is that there are greater needs elsewhere and that if they do decide to push for one or both of them it will and should be as a Best Player Available with a final spot in the class.

*Will the Vols try and greyshirt someone like Darrion Williamson (injury) or Will Albright to fit another player into the class?  Does Melvin McBride’s medical retirement give the Vols room to enroll 26 in this class?  Both are questions that the answers to will determine how many more spots there actually are