Finding the Rhythm in Tennessee’s New Schedule

We fired up our Expected Win Total Machine this week as soon as the SEC released the new 2020 schedule. If you haven’t already, you can go there and put in your win probabilities for every game on Tennessee’s new schedule, and the machine will give you how many games you think the Vols will win this season. It’s one thing to say you think the Vols will go 6-4 with wins over abc and losses to xyz. But we find it to be a better, healthier exercise to assign win probabilities for each game to get a record projection.

What does a successful season look like now? Our community projects the Vols to win 5.82 games against this schedule. If you round up to a 6-4 finish, that would guarantee Tennessee beat at least one of its five preseason Top 15 opponents. Pre-pandemic, an 8-4 finish against the original schedule felt like the head-nod verdict: yep, okay, that’s probably what we should expect, moving on. But whereas an 8-4 finish against the original schedule didn’t guarantee you a marquee win, a 6-4 finish against a 10-game SEC slate should include at least one signature win.

As we know, not all 8-4’s are created equal, and neither will all 6-4’s this year. But some of the things we use to measure success – like a traditional January 1 bowl – may not be available this season. Signature wins will be more important than ever, but so too will overall progress in metrics like SP+. It still holds that one of the best ways to measure progress for the 2020 Vols is the, “We have a chance to win this game,” test. After 2001, the only Tennessee team not to lose at least one three-possession game is 2015. That would be a good list for the 2020 Vols to be on.

Everything is about the SEC East race. That should really always be the case. The original move of the Georgia game to November would’ve kept the Vols in the SEC East chase much longer than usual, just for the hope of knocking off the Dawgs in Athens towards the end of the season. Now Georgia is in week three, but I think Tennessee actually benefits from that trade: Florida is the season finale instead of a mid-November date, and the Gators’ schedule offers them a better chance to be the team to beat. Lose in week three to Georgia and you’re behind, but the Dawgs are in Tuscaloosa the very next week, where Tennessee could instantly get a game back. Simply by playing Alabama, Georgia is the easier team to catch in the standings if you don’t beat them head-to-head. And even if the Gators do find success against their lighter load, Tennessee can still knock them off in Knoxville in December. The Vols should stay in the race for a long time this season, and that in and of itself will feel very much like progress.

Trap opponents out of trap weeks. If we assume Vanderbilt and Arkansas don’t qualify as trap games because the Vols should be able to overwhelm them with talent, the remaining candidates are South Carolina, Missouri, and Kentucky…and the Cats only qualify because they haven’t won in Knoxville since 1984. But now, Tennessee gets trap opponents in weeks one and two. If we learned anything at all from Georgia State, the Vols shouldn’t be caught off guard out the gate. So while we didn’t want to play two non-Top 15 opponents back-to-back to help with the schedule’s overall rhythm, it’s a really good setup on the front end.

Here’s how our community rates Tennessee’s chances in each game:

  • at South Carolina: 67.1%
  • Missouri: 76.1%
  • at Georgia: 30.0%
  • Kentucky: 68.0%
  • Alabama: 23.6%
  • at Arkansas: 85.3%
  • Texas A&M: 50.4%
  • at Auburn: 46.9%
  • at Vanderbilt: 88.6%
  • Florida: 46.1%

What does a balanced schedule for Tennessee look like?

“Not one with Auburn and Texas A&M,” you might say. But with those two added to the docket, the order of opponents becomes much more important: if you’re playing five preseason Top 15 teams for only the second time ever, you don’t want to play any of them in consecutive weeks if you can help it.

The Vols, of course, can’t help it: they’ll get what the league office gives them, which clearly didn’t work to our advantage last time. Today we’ll discover our week one opponent at 3:00 PM ET and the full slate at 7:00. Aside from putting some distance between our five marquee opponents, what would be most advantageous for the Vols?

If you gave me the authority to set Tennessee’s entire schedule, I’d go with something like this:

Week 1: Missouri – the Vols face two year one coaches in 2020, and with one of them at struggling Arkansas, I’ll take my chances in week one with Missouri. The assumption here is no spring practice is especially cruel to new coaches, and the Vols get a shot at Eli Drinkwitz’s squad before they get their feet set. And if fans are allowed in the stands, it’s nice to open at home.

Week 2: at Auburn – The rhythm you want puts a Top 15 opponent between a not-Top 15 opponent, and I’m taking the Tigers first. Auburn now has Chad Morris running the offense, another disadvantage with no spring practice. It fills the week two hole where Oklahoma would’ve been, and is a lower-risk entry to big-time football as a cross-divisional opponent: lose and it’s not an enormous setback in the SEC East, win and you do wonders early.

Week 3: at Vanderbilt – I put Tennessee’s two easiest games around two of their most difficult:

Week 4: Florida – The Gators maintain their traditional place on Tennessee’s schedule, and the healthy distance from the Georgia game the Vols would’ve enjoyed for the first time in 2020 anyway.

Week 5: bye – It may seem more advantageous to put the bye in the dead center of the schedule the following week, but I like it better here to do things this way:

Week 6: Alabama – The Vols retain their bye the week before the Crimson Tide come to Knoxville, and avoid whatever emotional response would come from winning or losing to the Gators in playing the following week.

Week 7: at Arkansas – What might be Tennessee’s easiest game on the schedule needs to surround one of their big three rivalries and preseason Top 10 games, so we’ve got Arkansas in the aftermath of Alabama, where it also serves as a nice buffer for…

Week 8: Texas A&M – Whatever you want to believe about the Aggies’ ceiling in preseason will surely be known by now, so you either get another marquee game or a frustrated squad with less to play for. Similar logic comes into play with:

Week 9: at South Carolina – I was tempted to make the Gamecocks Tennessee’s week one opponent, but you’d rather catch a potentially embattled coach later in the season when things might already be lost.

Week 10: Kentucky – As it originally existed on Tennessee’s schedule, this is the warm-up…

Week 11: at Georgia – …and this is the finisher. Having Georgia at the end could keep SEC East hopes alive throughout the season, just by having the possibility of an upset win in Athens on the table. Having spent our entire SEC East existence playing Florida (other than 2001) and Georgia in the first half of the season, we’re used to our fate being sealed by the second week of October. I hope the league office keeps the Dawgs at the end of our road; it’s an enticing option if they want to keep the Cocktail Party’s place in the order intact, and keep Alabama and Auburn on the final weekend. The Dawgs and Gators are used to facing key rivals this weekend anyway, so I’d love for Tennessee to get one of those Week 11 spots on their schedule.

Anything you’d most like to see when the schedule is released today?

A Coalition of the Willing?

Three weeks ago we had some fun with post-pandemic fantasy booking, creating a 32-team college football super division. It was a fun exercise to pass the late-July time, but only fun because Tennessee would easily make any cut of 32: if you want to know who’s most likely to be left standing on the other side of all this, follow the money.

It’s no surprise then, in the present, which schools from the Big Ten are arguing loudest for fall football in any form or fashion.

Who are the bigger programs? That’s a pretty easy answer in each of the power five conferences. What might be noteworthy, from the data in our fantasy booking story, is how much bigger those programs are than their league brethren.

Using the Wall Street Journal’s list of college football’s most valuable programs from 2018, we noted distinctions in a couple of tiers:

Thirteen programs are valued at $500+ million:

  • Half the SEC (Six traditional powers plus Texas A&M)
  • Big Ten: Ohio State, Michigan, Penn State
  • Big 12: Texas & Oklahoma
  • Notre Dame
  • ACC: zero
  • Pac-12: zero

Thirty-two programs are valued at $250+ million:

  • SEC: 11 of 14
  • Big Ten: 8 of 14
  • Big 12: 4 of 10
  • Notre Dame
  • ACC: 3 of 14
  • Pac-12: 5 of 12

Sometimes the dividing line between the haves and the have-nots is easy to spot. In the SEC, Mississippi State ($223 mil.) just misses making it 12 of 14 to clear $250 million in value. From there, it’s a steep drop to Missouri ($122) and Vanderbilt ($81). A “no” from Nashville isn’t going to be worth much.

In the ACC, there’s clear separation between the top three (Clemson, Florida State, and Virginia Tech all between $275-300 million) and the rest of the league (Georgia Tech is next at $215; no one else is above $200). But those top three are starting so much farther back than the biggest fish in the SEC, Big Ten, and Big 12 ponds, it’s uncertain how much weight they carry among the other 11 ACC institutions in a basketball conference, even when two have rings from the last decade. Washington has a healthy lead on the rest of the Pac-12 ($440 million; Oregon is second at $348), but there’s no clear separation between an upper and lower class there either, and no financial superpowers.

Who wants to play in the Big Ten? Take a guess:

It seems contractually unlikely anyone could break ranks and play out-of-conference this fall. But if you’re looking at who might be itching for something different – especially if other power conferences do play this fall – it’s the top half of that chart. They can share revenue all they want, but the longer this goes the more it becomes about survival for college athletics. And the top half of that chart is far more likely to find a way.

So now, if so much hangs on what the Big 12 wants to do?

How much of that conversation is really about what Texas and Oklahoma want to do? Especially considering half of the remaining conference also resides in one of those two states with the same politicians?

I don’t know if playing this fall is the best idea or not. But if you’re looking for teams who are most likely to come alongside it, keep following the money.

Is this Tennessee’s most difficult schedule ever? Almost.

There’s no historical context for a 10-game SEC season in the modern era, so sure, you can make the argument that this kind of gauntlet, absent any FCS cupcakes or mid-major challengers, is harder than anything else the Vols have faced before. But as the major talking point is how the Vols are playing five teams in the preseason Top 15 (in the coaches’ poll), it’s a good way to compare what the 2020 Vols might/will face to what Tennessee teams of the past have seen.

(For this piece I used the preseason AP poll data from College Poll Archive, which goes back much farther than their coaches’ poll data.)

Tennessee’s schedule, as you know, is always hard: Florida, Georgia, and Alabama are ever present, ever elite. Alabama has been ranked no lower than third in the preseason AP poll for 11 years in a row, no big deal. Georgia has been ranked third or fourth in the preseason poll the last three years. And though not quite that high in the present, Florida was preseason top five three times under Urban Meyer and eight under Steve Spurrier, including six years in a row from 1994-99. Those teams are always going to be there. The Vols have two top five and three top ten teams on their 2020 schedule, but nothing about that is unusual for Tennessee.

The Vols have also played a historically difficult non-conference opponent each year. Since the league expanded to divisional play in 1992 nearly 30 years ago, Tennessee has faced a preseason Top 15 non-conference foe eight times; Oklahoma would’ve made nine this year.

So, how does playing five preseason Top 15 teams (#3 Alabama, #4 Georgia, #8 Florida, #11 Auburn, #13 Texas A&M) compare to Tennessee’s recent history? Since divisional play began in 1992, only one season can match it: Butch Jones’ first year in 2013, when the Vols played five preseason Top 10 teams: #1 Alabama, #3 Oregon, #5 Georgia, #6 South Carolina, and #10 Florida. (Preseason poll only, so that fun doesn’t include eventual national runner-up Auburn or SEC East champion Missouri, which finished fifth.) Remember that?

In four other seasons since 1992, the Vols have faced four preseason Top 15 teams:

  • 2014: #2 Alabama, #4 Oklahoma, #9 South Carolina, #12 Georgia
  • 2011: #2 Alabama, #4 LSU, #12 South Carolina, #15 Arkansas
  • 2009: #1 Florida, #5 Alabama, #8 Ole Miss, #13 Georgia
  • 2006: #7 Florida, #8 LSU, #9 California, #15 Georgia

Again, the preseason poll is prone to error: the Vols beat South Carolina in 2014 and dominated Cal in the 2006 opener. It’s all perception at this point, and an accurate one to say 2020 would be one of the most difficult schedules the Vols have ever faced going in…just not quite at the top of that list. And those Butch Jones Vols in year one were both less talented and had their chances. So if we do play this thing, there’s still reason, even in the midst of nearly unprecedented difficulty, to see opportunity.

First Impressions of the New SEC Schedule

We said for weeks if the Vols added one of Auburn/LSU/Texas A&M and one Mississippi school, in any combination, Tennessee would be getting a fair deal. Turns out, not so much: the Vols travel to Auburn and host Texas A&M (for the first time! in front of few/no fans!).

Our immediate takeaways:

The imbalance with Florida and Georgia hurts most. The Gators and Dawgs each play two of the SEC West’s top four teams, AND now they both play Arkansas as well, negating whatever advantage that already provided Tennessee. Georgia added the Hogs and Mississippi State to their already-difficult combo of Alabama and Auburn. Florida, who had the scheduling advantage before the pandemic, keeps LSU and adds Texas A&M while also facing Ole Miss and Arkansas. But the Vols will get Alabama, Auburn, and A&M. That’s two Top 15 SEC West opponents for Florida and Georgia, but three – including Alabama – for Tennessee. This is the biggest gripe, and the biggest block in the way of any dark horse hopes in the SEC East.

Arkansas has the most difficult schedule in the conference. Which makes sense for a team riding a 19-game SEC losing streak? One thing was clear: the league favored its best teams instead of balance across the board. One SEC West team had to play both Florida and Georgia, and the league decided it should be the Razorbacks.

Using the SP+ tier system from our mock schedule, here’s how each division’s schedules rank:

SEC East

  • 9 tier points (most difficult): Kentucky, South Carolina, Tennessee
  • 10 tier points: Georgia, Missouri, Vanderbilt
  • 11 tier points: Florida

SEC West

  • 7 tier points: Arkansas
  • 8 tier points: Alabama, Auburn
  • 10 tier points: Mississippi State, Texas A&M
  • 11 tier points: Ole Miss
  • 12 tier points: LSU

For reference, LSU plays Florida, Missouri, South Carolina, and Vanderbilt. It’s good to be the king, apparently.

How the schedule falls is now the most important thing for Tennessee. Since literally half the schedule is against a Top 15 opponent, the Vols should really hope to see those five teams every other game, alternating between:

  • Alabama, Auburn, Florida, Georgia, Texas A&M
  • Arkansas, Kentucky, Missouri, South Carolina, Vanderbilt

But, as we’ve seen, don’t count on the powers that be in the SEC to show favor to a program that isn’t at the top right now.

One final note: Tennessee’s current athletic director comes from a time when the Vols welcomed anyone, anywhere, anytime.

If they play this thing, we’re gonna need all of that mentality.

Go Vols.

Our Updated SEC 10-Game Schedule Proposal

While we’re waiting for the real thing, here’s my best attempt at a mock 10-game league schedule. The guiding principles:

The two new opponents are added based on strength of schedule. I used preseason SP+ data to put each division in four tiers:

  • SEC East 1: Florida, Georgia
  • SEC East 2: Kentucky, Tennessee
  • SEC East 3: Missouri, South Carolina
  • SEC East 4: Vanderbilt
  • SEC West 1: Alabama
  • SEC West 2: Auburn, LSU, Texas A&M
  • SEC West 3: Ole Miss, Mississippi State
  • SEC West 4: Arkansas

We originally did this exercise to pick new opponents more than three weeks ago, but I made a copy/paste error on Auburn’s schedule and fooled myself into thinking no SEC West team had to play both Florida and Georgia. In reality, someone does, and I went with Auburn for a couple of reasons. The Tigers get the benefit of also playing Vanderbilt. If we anticipated full stadiums, I would’ve given Alabama both the Dawgs and Gators in Tuscaloosa. But that seems out of balance with home field worth far less this year, so this way both Auburn and Alabama play Georgia, then split the rest of the SEC East, with Auburn getting both Florida and Vanderbilt for balance. There’s also still a rivalry factor (I think) with the Gators and Auburn, annual foes before the league switched formats in 2003. Otherwise, I stuck with the two new opponents selected in that piece three weeks ago.

If each tier is worth its designated point value, every team in the league plays a cross-divisional schedule worth either nine or ten points, except now Auburn is at eight points.

TeamAnnual2020NewNew
FloridaLSUOle MissAuburnTexas A&M
GeorgiaAuburnAlabamaArkansasMiss State
KentuckyMiss StateAuburnLSUOle Miss
MissouriArkansasMiss StateAlabamaLSU
S CarolinaTexas A&MLSUAlabamaArkansas
TennesseeAlabamaArkansasOle MissTexas A&M
VanderbiltOle MissTexas A&MAuburnMiss State
AlabamaTennesseeGeorgiaMissouriS Carolina
ArkansasMissouriTennesseeGeorgiaS Carolina
AuburnGeorgiaKentuckyFloridaVanderbilt
LSUFloridaS CarolinaKentuckyMissouri
Ole MissVanderbiltFloridaKentuckyTennessee
Miss StateKentuckyMissouriGeorgiaVanderbilt
Texas A&MS CarolinaVanderbiltFloridaTennessee

Now that we’ve got the teams, the schedule itself:

Division games are played the first seven weeks, with annual rivalries taking up the odd team out slot each week. So from September 26 through November 7, each week would feature six divisional games and one annual rivalry. Every team gets a bye on November 14. This leaves room for any early season cancellations to slide over. Then the existing 2020 rotating opponent is played on November 21 (SEC West hosting this year), so we put SEC East hosts for new games on November 28 and back to the West for the season finale on December 5.

(If you can’t see the full tables, turn your phone to landscape mode or click here for a better look via Google Sheets.)

SEC East

FLAUGAUKMIZSCARTENVAN
9.26UKAUBat FLAVANTENat SCARat MIZ
10.3LSUat MIZat TENUGAat VANUKSCAR
10.10at VANat SCARMSUat TENUGAMIZFLA
10.17vs UGAvs FLAVANat SCARMIZALAUK
10.24MIZat UKUGAat FLAA&Mat VANTEN
10.31SCARTENat MIZUKat FLAat UGAMISS
11.7at TENVANSCARvs ARKat UKFLAat UGA
11.14
11.21at MISSat ALAat AUBat MSUat LSUat ARKat A&M
11.28A&MMSULSUALAARKMISSAUB
12.5at AUBat ARKat MISSat LSUat ALAat A&Mat MSU

SEC West

ALAARKAUBLSUMISSMSUA&M
9.26at ARKALAat UGAMISSat LSUA&Mat MSU
10.3at MISSat MSUA&Mat FLAALAARKat AUB
10.10A&MLSUat MISSat ARKAUBat UKat ALA
10.17at TENat A&MLSUat AUBMSUat MISSARK
10.24at LSUMISSat MSUALAat ARKAUBat SCAR
10.31MSUat AUBARKat A&Mat VANat ALALSU
11.7AUBvs MIZat ALAMSUat A&Mat LSUMISS
11.14
11.21UGATENUKSCARFLAMIZVAN
11.28at MIZat SCARat VANat UKat TENat UGAat FLA
12.5SCARUGAFLAMIZUKVANTEN

It’s not perfect, but really any of those first seven weeks can be moved around. The way I’ve drawn it up, the Vols get Georgia and Florida back-to-back, and Alabama plays four of its first five on the road, something I think we’d have to see the conference office do to believe it. But in a season of weirdness, I like the balance this schedule is built on. Like anything else right now, it seeks to make the best of the given moment.

Vols in the NBA Restart: Perfect Timing

The nearest available certainties in sports world right now:

  • Bubbles are best, moving the NBA front and center
  • If you’re watching the NBA, there’s never been a better time to be a Tennessee fan
https://twitter.com/Vol_Hoops/status/1288844296821432320

The league returned to action with two games last night, and – with apologies to Jordans McRae and Bone, eliminated from playoff contention outside the bubble in Detroit – Tennessee’s NBA contingent in Orlando will see its first action today, with Washington vs Phoenix at 4:00 PM and a showdown between Boston and Milwaukee at 6:30 (ESPN).

Until…well, really until right now, this season, the NBA experience through the eyes of a Tennessee fan was about individual players. Bernard King was a four-time all-star, two-time first-team All-NBA player, and won the league’s scoring title in 1985. Six years after he entered the league, Dale Ellis began an 18-year NBA career that included an all-star appearance and three-point shootout crown in 1989. And a decade after Ellis was drafted, Allan Houston began his 12-year career that would include two all-star appearances, a gold medal in the 2000 Olympics, and a run to the 1999 NBA Finals featuring a classic series-ending shot.

Those three guys have their numbers in the rafters at Thompson-Boling. And for a program like Tennessee, it’s reasonable to expect three NBA All-Stars to come through your doors over 15 years.

The problem was, on the NBA level, there were really no other options. Between King and Ellis, Reggie Johnson was drafted in 1980 and played four years, averaging eight points per game. Between Ellis and Houston, four Tennessee players saw action in the league but none played more than 50 games. And after Houston, Vincent Yarbrough and Marcus Haislip had initial opportunities, but neither were able to stick.

(Shout out to Real GM and Basketball Reference for their usual excellence)

C.J. Watson caught one year of Bruce Pearl’s magic and grew into a 10-year backup point guard, averaging 20.2 minutes per game with four playoff appearances. Tobias Harris slowly built his career from one-and-done success at Tennessee through four teams and only one playoff appearance, swept by LeBron in round one four years ago. But now in Philadelphia, he’ll make his second straight postseason appearance with the Sixers, with aspirations of staying in Orlando for a while.

Harris, a could-be all-star, fit nicely into the mold of cheering for one player that Tennessee fans had for so long. Add in Watson and Jordan McRae, who got a ring with Cleveland in 2016, and the Vols were slowly building NBA depth. But then two of our favorite Vols of the last decade changed everything: Josh Richardson and Rick Barnes.

Richardson had one of the most satisfying four-year arcs of any Tennessee player I’ve ever seen. And it turned out the curve didn’t stop in Knoxville: he maintained his consistent improvement through four seasons in Miami, and led the team in scoring in 2019 with 16.6 points per game. Not bad for a defensive stopper we thought, “Yeah, but can he be the alpha?” after Cuonzo Martin’s Sweet 16 run.

Traded to Philly for Jimmy Butler, now he and Tobias average more than 30 minutes per game. If you want Vol quantity and quality, the Sixers are your team…and if they can figure out the right combination of their fascinating pieces, could be trouble in Orlando, currently tied for fifth in the Eastern Conference.

Kyle Alexander is on Miami’s bubble roster, currently fourth in the East, but is yet to play an NBA minute. The biggest bubble opportunity might belong to Admiral Schofield, playing on an injury-riddled Washington team. He averaged 10.9 minutes in 27 games with the Wizards this season, but should be more opportunities in the eight seeding games Washington is guaranteed. Congrats to Admiral for being the only person in America to lose weight in quarantine, who slimmed down to guard more positions but:

And then there’s Grant Williams.

Look, you know what you’re getting from me as a Celtics fan. But let’s just talk about Tennessee for a minute. Bernard King and Allan Houston had opposite problems. King played on legendary teams at Tennessee, but never found much team success in the NBA. In 1984 the Knicks took the eventual champion Celtics to seven games in the second round, and King averaged 29.1 points in the series. But the Knicks failed to reach the postseason in his scoring title season the following year, and then injuries closed his window in New York. Houston, as noted, was a part of plenty of team success with the Knicks at the turn of the century. But his Tennessee teams, though fueled by his scoring, never made the NCAA Tournament.

It’s incredibly rare to earn both individual and team success at Tennessee and in the pros, and not just in basketball. Reggie White is one of the greatest defensive players in the history of football. But his Tennessee tenure is light on team success. Alvin Kamara is one of the most exciting players in the NFL right now…which only makes his college career more frustrating.

And some of our most beloved individual performers at Tennessee – Heath Shuler, Chris Lofton – didn’t make it at the highest professional levels. But those are the guys you want to cheer for most. If Josh Dobbs earns a starting job, I think you’ll see incredibly high levels of support for him.

For almost 20 years, Peyton Manning carried this torch for Tennessee. Since his retirement, who’s got the belt now? Which former Vol has the best combination of collegiate and professional success? Who do you want to cheer for the most, who then gives you the best opportunity to be for them?

I’d argue Candace Parker should be the best answer to that question, but I’m not sure how many of us are watching the WNBA.

The answer isn’t necessarily Grant Williams right now. As a rookie, he averages 16 minutes per game. You’ll see twice as much action from Tobias and JRich.

But Williams carries so much love and success from his Tennessee tenure, you want it for him so badly. And on a Boston team that has a hard time putting its best five players on the floor together, Williams was already seeing some action in fourth quarter small-ball lineups. All signs point to him playing meaningful minutes in playoff games, where Boston is currently the three seed in the East. For our purposes, hopefully the Celtics and Sixers don’t run into each other in the first round.

In scrimmage work in Orlando:

That’s just one of many small moments of joy from Williams this season, that could potentially blossom into a big following from Tennessee’s fan base.

Okay, again, I’m biased for Boston. But still: 30+ minutes from Tobias and JRich, a huge opportunity for Schofield, and Grant Williams doing Grant Williams things in the playoffs?

This is the best it’s ever been for Tennessee in the NBA at a time when the NBA is in the best position in sports. Whatever does or doesn’t happen with football – now three weeks later in the calendar anyway – enjoy what the Vols will give us in Orlando.

SEC Scheduling: What if future cross-division opponents are added in 2020?

When the Big Ten announced it was going to conference-only play three weeks ago, we looked at a balanced version of a 10-game SEC schedule if the league elected to move in the same direction. Like the ACC’s version, something like that would involve some willingness to get creative from the league office, to insert themselves in the interests of fairness and balance. That schedule we put together featured no SEC West teams playing both Florida and Georgia, and every SEC East team who played Alabama also playing Arkansas.

Yesterday Sports Illustrated’s Ross Dellenger reported the SEC was indeed looking at a 10-game league schedule, and that the extra two games would come instead from the pre-existing rotation opponents from 2021 and 2022:

So this is a straightforward solution, and it involves no additional decision making from anyone. But how fair is it?

For Tennessee, it’s one of several balanced options. Because the Vols were already playing the presumptive best and worst teams in the SEC West, any combination of one of the Mississippi schools and one of Auburn, LSU, or Texas A&M would’ve been the most fair way to add to Tennessee’s slate. Here the Vols get Ole Miss in Knoxville and LSU in Baton Rouge, giving Tennessee one of the most even slates in the league.

The biggest news for Tennessee: now Florida and Georgia both have to play Alabama. So after a dozen or so years of complaining about it, in 2020 the Vols have zero disadvantage from playing the Crimson Tide in comparison to their SEC East rivals. In fact, consider the balance or lack thereof here:

  • Florida: LSU, Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M
  • Georgia: Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi State
  • Tennessee: Alabama, Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss

The Gators had a huge advantage coming into this season with both Georgia and Tennessee playing Alabama. Now? Not only do the Gators pick up the Tide, they get Texas A&M as well. Florida plays three SEC West contenders; the Vols and Dawgs just two.

Also, potential advantage Kentucky:

  • Kentucky: Mississippi State, Auburn, LSU, Ole Miss

…who doesn’t face Alabama at all and still gets both Mississippi schools. This arrangement is a big boost to the Cats.

In our post three weeks ago, we used the 2020 SP+ projections to put each division in four tiers, and sought to create a schedule with the most balance across the board. In what we came up with, every team’s cross-divisional opponents had a total of nine or ten tier points. If the league just sticks with the future rotations, the tier points would look like this:

  • Florida: LSU, Ole Miss, Alabama, Texas A&M (8 tier points)
  • Georgia: Auburn, Alabama, Arkansas, Mississippi State (10)
  • Kentucky: Mississippi State, Auburn, LSU, Ole Miss (10)
  • South Carolina: Texas A&M, LSU, Auburn, Arkansas (10)
  • Tennessee: Alabama, Arkansas, LSU, Ole Miss (10)
  • Vanderbilt: Ole Miss, Texas A&M, Alabama, Mississippi State (9)
  • Alabama: Georgia, Tennessee, Florida, Vanderbilt (8 tier points)
  • Arkansas: Tennessee, Missouri, Georgia, South Carolina (9)
  • Auburn: Georgia, Kentucky, South Carolina, Missouri (9)
  • LSU: Florida, South Carolina, Tennessee, Kentucky (8)
  • Ole Miss: Florida, Vanderbilt, Tennessee, Kentucky (9)
  • Mississippi State: Missouri, Kentucky, Vanderbilt, Georgia (10)
  • Texas A&M: South Carolina, Vanderbilt, Missouri, Florida (11)

The winners in this setup: Kentucky to some degree, but look at Texas A&M: no Georgia, no Tennessee, no Kentucky. Meanwhile Alabama is easily the biggest loser here – and hey, if I’m a Bammer, maybe I’m saying screw all this, we’ll beat everybody! – but the difference between their cross-divisional schedule and Texas A&M’s is huge. And Florida, as we’ve discussed, went from one of the East’s easiest slates to its most difficult.

If the SEC does go this route, it’s more simple but less fair.

But not to Tennessee.

Post-Pandemic Fantasy Booking: A 32-Team College Football Super Division

The question we asked in our last post was, if the landscape of college’s football’s future changes due to the pandemic, how many new setups would be better than the SEC going its own way and just playing a 13-game round robin every year? That scenario assumes full-on isolationism emerges from all this. But what if instead we see something embracing a little more free trade among the biggest powers that be?

When trying to figure out which athletic departments are best equipped to handle this sort of thing and which programs are most likely to be least affected, the simplest solution is to follow the money. The Wall Street Journal lists the top 115 college football programs by overall value (using 2018 data). This, as much as anything, shows us the difference between the haves and the have nots. And that difference is significantly bigger than Power Five and mid-major:

Most Valuable College Football Programs (2018)

  • $1+ billion: Texas, Ohio State, Alabama
  • $750+ million: Michigan, Notre Dame, Georgia, Oklahoma, Auburn, LSU
  • $500+ million: Tennessee (just outside the next group at $727 million), Florida, Texas A&M, Penn State

The blue bloods of college football net worth. The six traditional SEC powers plus newcomer Texas A&M, the three traditional Big Ten powers, Texas and Oklahoma, and Notre Dame. This group unquestionably wields the most power in college football.

  • $250+ million: Wisconsin, Nebraska, Arkansas, South Carolina, Iowa, Washington, Michigan State, Oregon, Ole Miss, USC, UCLA, Arizona State, Clemson, Florida State, Virginia Tech, Kansas State, Oklahoma State, Kentucky, Minnesota

The next tier includes 19 programs and the first appearance of the ACC and Pac-12. 2018 data would be before the launch of the ACC Network last fall, which may help close some of this gap in the short-term, but less so in the long compared to the SEC’s upcoming deal with ESPN.

This group of 32 programs (a nice, round playoff-ish/NFL number!) worth more than $250 million looks like this

  • 11 of 14 SEC programs
  • 8 of 14 Big Ten programs
  • 4 of 10 Big 12 programs, with wide disparity between Texas/OU and Kansas State/Oklahoma State
  • 5 of 12 Pac 12 programs
  • 3 of 14 ACC programs
  • Notre Dame

As you can see, the gap between the haves and the have nots is significant in the ACC (in football), and the Big 12, where the difference between Texas and everyone else already threatened to break up the conference once.

If you go one more, here’s the next tier:

$100+ million: Texas Tech, Stanford, Mississippi State, Georgia Tech, Utah, Colorado, Kansas, California, Miami, TCU, Iowa State, Indiana, Northwestern, NC State, Louisville, Arizona, Illinois, North Carolina, Maryland, Washington State, Virginia, Purdue, Oregon State, Missouri, Syracuse, Pittsburgh, Baylor

That’s 27 more teams, all from Power Five representation. BYU is the next team on the list, 60th overall, at $93 million. At this point it’s easier to talk about the Power Five schools that aren’t valued at more than $100 million:

  • ACC: Boston College, Wake Forest, Duke
  • Big Ten: Rutgers
  • Big 12: West Virginia (surprisingly, the least valuable Power Five team at $61 million)
  • Pac 12: none
  • SEC: Vanderbilt ($81 million)

If you’re looking for outside candidates to get in the mix, here’s the list of most valuable mid-majors that aren’t Notre Dame:

  • BYU $93 million
  • Boise State $78 million
  • Central Florida $68 million
  • South Florida $58 million

If the Power Five and Notre Dame broke away, that’s 65 schools. Would there be any real incentive for the Pac-12 to add BYU and Boise State? If you value television markets, maybe the Big 12 looks to BYU or Central Florida, but there doesn’t seem to be a huge natural fit there. On paper, the Power Five expanding any further seems less likely.

But if power was truly consolidated at the tippy-top?

If mid-major and FCS games no longer existed and the SEC didn’t want to just play a round-robin, they could poach Clemson and Virginia Tech. Or they could apologize to Missouri and Vanderbilt and add Clemson, Virginia Tech, Florida State, and Miami.

So here’s the kind of fantasy booking that becomes percentage points more possible in a pandemic:

  • SEC East: Clemson, Florida, Florida State, Georgia, Kentucky, Miami, South Carolina, Virginia Tech
  • SEC West: Existing SEC West plus Tennessee
  • New Conference East: Notre Dame plus the seven most valuable Big Ten schools (Iowa, Michigan, Michigan State, Nebraska, Ohio State, Penn State, Wisconsin)
  • New Conference West: Five most valuable Pac 12 schools (Arizona State, Oregon, UCLA, USC, Washington) plus Oklahoma, Oklahoma State, and Texas

(Apologies to Kansas State and Minnesota, who were bumped from this exercise in favor of league balance for Mississippi State and Miami.)

Play your seven division opponents, plus half the teams from the other division. This means even though we’ve moved Tennessee to the SEC West, they’ll still play Florida, Georgia, etc. every other year. A 12th game could feature a pre-assigned foe from the other conference (as in, third place team from the SEC West last year plays the third place team from New Conference West last year).

Is this better than what we have? If you want the most number of compelling Saturdays, yes. Is a model where only the most powerful programs have a seat at the table the very best thing for college football? Probably not: it’s also compelling to see if a mid-major can take down a Power Five school once a year or so, and over time the lesser-thans in this group would become mid-major equivalents.

No one is sure what kind of system we’ll end up with on the other side of all this. I’m grateful to be able to do this exercise in fun, because Tennessee is one of the most valuable programs in the nation. But what’s best for football needs to include what’s best for the version of me that grew up a Kansas State fan, or a Southern Miss fan (#101 in value). And to get to that kind of setup – to get to a future where college football can ultimately become more fruitful and not less – college football needs better leadership, now and into the future.

Will a better SEC emerge from all this?

If the only certainty right now is uncertainty, college football echoes it best by the absence of any central leadership. The NCAA offers little top-down guidance when it comes to football, and we’re seeing it play out in real time. The simplest solution to a lack of central leadership in college football – the Power Five conferences working together – is already out the window with the Big Ten and Pac-12 going to a league-only model without waiting for (or perhaps even trying to build?) consensus.

That doesn’t mean the most lucrative path forward isn’t Power Five only college football. Stewart Mandel said it best in The Athletic yesterday:

But more than anything, this crisis has laid bare that there are a small handful of schools (the Power 5 and a few others) with the resources to even be trying to field sports teams this fall. The other 200-something Division I athletic departments are just trying to survive until next year.

(He goes on to point out that if the College Football Playoff – governed by a board of managers with equal representation from all ten conferences and Notre Dame – voted to move the CFP to the spring, would individual conferences buck that kind of system to play in the fall anyway?)

Maybe we get a vaccine that works and is widely adopted by the public in time to have a fully-functional football season in the spring. Maybe that leads to college football looking more or less the same, at least on the Power Five level, in 2022: eight or nine conference games, a major out-of-conference games, two mid-majors and an FCS opponent.

But if the maybes get thin, the bottom starts falling out for mid-majors, and no one’s in charge at the top? There’s no telling what college football might look like. There’s no telling if the flow of a season we’ve come to know for almost 30 years since the SEC went to divisional play and dominoes started falling toward the Bowl Alliance and BCS…might’ve been seen for the last time in 2019.

Who knows. But to whatever degree we’re able to think long-term right now, one question becomes, “How could the SEC be improved?”

Things that are normally reserved for fantasy booking now have a chance at reality, even if only because if feels like everything is on the table. For example, if all of college football went wild west, the SEC could just stay as it is and play round robin every year. Thirteen games and a fair champion (unless you get a three-way tie) because everyone plays everyone. Suddenly 8-5 doesn’t look so bad! To make it more interesting for all involved, take your top four teams at the end of the regular season and play an SEC Final Four, with semifinal games at home sites and the SEC Championship in Atlanta. This way 28.5% of your league makes the playoffs, still a far more meaningful number than we usually see in sports.

But this and any scenario that involves removing FCS/mid-major players would fundamentally change an idea that Tennessee and the league’s traditional powers have been chasing for those same 30+ years: perfection is attainable.

I used to believe it’s what made college football great. It’s what happens when you grow up in a time when your team has a chance to go undefeated every year and actually does it once.

But the last dozen years have been both humbling and enlightening. And even before then, I’ve found some of the most enjoyment from some of Tennessee’s most compelling stories, and those came in seasons with plenty of adversity like 2007 in football and 2010 in basketball.

Since 2008, Alabama is 150-17 (.898). The next closest teams in wins are Clemson and Boise State with 133. In winning percentage, it’s Ohio State at .845. And in the SEC, LSU is second-best in the last twelve years with 120 wins. That’s thirty fewer victories in a dozen years.

So who’s to say Alabama wouldn’t just keep winning if they were playing the full SEC gauntlet? Who’s to say new cupcakes wouldn’t emerge over time to replace the old ones? But I think an SEC-only setup that gave four teams from the league a chance to “win it all” every year would do some tremendous good for the mental health of a fan base. Much better than losing to Alabama in the SEC West (or Spurrier’s Florida in the 90’s in the East) and feeling like your whole season is over for one blemish. If you do earn perfection, it means more than ever before. And when you almost certainly don’t, you’re not a crazy person just because your team went 10-3. This kind of setup produces more compelling stories.

It would certainly mean compelling match-ups every time out. The year before the SEC went to divisional play, do you know who Tennessee played in the non-conference in 1991? Louisville, UCLA, Notre Dame, and Memphis (State). There’s saying every game matters, and then there’s scheduling like it. If the “least-appealing” game in your schedule is Vanderbilt, it still counts in the standings. Plus, rivalries past become rivalries present: hello, Auburn. In West Tennessee, hello Ole Miss. And goodbye, disadvantage of being the only SEC East team to play Alabama every year.

This is never the best question to ask to pursue a more fruitful solution, but how much would you mind if something like this happened? If it did, I think the majority of SEC fans would take it. An SEC team has won the national championship 12 times in the last 22 years, plus undefeated Auburn in 2004, plus SEC teams that played for the title and lost in 2013, 2016, and 2018. That’s 16 out of 22 years before we even have to bring up what the Vols did in the SEC Championship Game in 2001. No SEC Champion has anything to prove to anyone. If we just played within our own league every year and crowned a champion, you’d feel just fine about the end result and the champion could still talk trash to Clemson or Ohio State in theory.

Are there better, more inclusive models out there? Sure; we’ll keep fantasy booking and look at some of those another day. But if a worst-case scenario for the SEC with no NCAA leadership and not enough cooperation within Power Five leagues is just to play itself round robin every year? That’s a pretty good safety net.