Now that we’re back: Tennessee’s history with preseason polls

Tennessee’s sports calendar never really ends, which is great when you’re good at everything. Softball hosts their regional this weekend, while baseball is at South Carolina, trying to play their way into hosting theirs. The hope is both teams give us the chance to watch them play into the month of June.

This time of year also marks the full turn into lookahead season for football, led by the tangible sign of preseason magazines. It’s no longer way-too-early season. And though we’re still a hair more than 100 days to Tennessee’s kickoff on September 3, what’s being put out into the world by many prognosticators now represents their final draft of 2023 expectations.

For the first time since 2016, we don’t have to wonder if Tennessee will be ranked. The Vols were the proverbial last team in for the preseason AP Top 25 in 2015, 2017, and 2020. They were the first team out last season, the first “also receiving votes” in the 2022 preseason poll.

Now that we’ve rectified all that with a season as good as any other around here that didn’t end in a national championship, where will the Vols begin again?

In 247’s post-spring consensus Top 25, Tennessee was ranked tenth. As you’ll see, that would put them in excellent company with what this program was at its peak.

When we talked about Tennessee being back, that wasn’t just to 1998. Are you in the hunt? And, in a sport preparing to move to a 12-team playoff, anything in that range for preseason expectations is a good sign.

That’s exactly where the Vols found themselves in the proverbial good old days:

Tennessee in the Preseason AP Top 25 Era (1989-Present)

RankYears
1
219961999
32005
4
519972002
6
7
8199019952001
92016
1019931998
111991
1220002003
131994
142004
152007
16
17
182008
19
20
211992
22
232006
24
25201520172020

From 1990 to 2007, Tennessee was ranked in the Top 15 of the preseason poll 16 times in 18 years.

That kind of consistency in that kind of company is what this kind of program is looking for. Roughly, the Top 12 (six automatic qualifiers plus six at-large) is getting ready to be the cutoff point. So anything in that neighborhood to start the season means you’re, again, in the hunt.

Last year’s team put Tennessee back in the promised land. And I believe this year’s team is going to begin their hunt from the same kind of ground we’re accustomed to seeing the Vols stand on when things are working well.

Go Vols.

What happens in the year after the year?

Something I find myself saying a lot – and will continue to do so joyfully – is that the 2022 team is best understood not just in how they left the wilderness, but that they found the promised land. It wasn’t just the first time in 15 years the Vols had a successful season by any definition. It was that, outside of 1998? What the 2022 Vols did stacks up against any other season you want in the modern era.

In my lifetime, I’d put them on the list with 1985, 1989, 1995, 1997, 1998, and 2001 as the Tennessee teams that came the closest to the mountaintop (you can add the 1990 SEC Champions if you want; more on them in a second). Those six seasons, along with 2022, featured landmark victories and the real belief that the Vols could be the best team in the country at various points along the way.

So…what do you do for an encore?

Here’s what happened the year after those years:

1985 (SEC Champions) to 1986

  • 1985 Final Poll: 4
  • 1986 Preseason: 10
  • 1986 Final Poll: NR

The ’85 SugarVols cashed in on the promise of Johnny Majors and routed #2 Miami in New Orleans as their final act. They were the first Vol squad to finish a season ranked in 11 years, first in the Top 5 in 15 years.

In 1986, Tennessee went 0-3 in one possession games in the regular season, with each of those losses coming in September and October. The Vols lost to Mississippi State by four, Georgia Tech by one, and Army by five. They were also blown out by #2 Alabama and #8 Auburn.

But Tennessee did rebound down the stretch, winning their final five games including the Liberty Bowl over Minnesota. They carried that momentum into 1987, when they’d finish 10-2-1 and ranked 17th.

1989 (SEC Champions) to 1990

  • 1989 Final Poll: 5
  • 1990 Preseason: 8
  • 1990 Final Poll: 8

Maybe the wildest of all seasons in Knoxville, the ’90 Vols went 9-2-2 and won their second consecutive SEC title. They tied a pair of Top 5 teams in Colorado and Auburn. They lost a heartbreaker to #1 Notre Dame, then won a thriller against former #1 Virginia in the Sugar Bowl. They blew out Steve Spurrier and #9 Florida 45-3, then suffered what I still think is the second-hardest loss of my lifetime to unranked Alabama 9-6. In the end, they finished right where they started: eighth in the polls, and SEC Champions once again. I don’t have them with this group of six teams because they played four games they didn’t win. But on sheer entertainment, this group is hard to beat.

1995 (#3 Final Poll) to 1996

  • 1995 Final Poll: 3
  • 1996 Preseason: 2
  • 1996 Final Poll: 9

The only one of these teams to start the year higher than their predecessors finished it. Peyton Manning’s junior year saw the Vols give up 35 straight points to Florida in Knoxville at the start of the game before scoring the next 29 to almost come back. This team was still on track for a huge year, but lost at Memphis for the first (and only) time in program history. That sent the Vols back to Orlando, where blowing out Northwestern wasn’t quite the same as the showdown with #4 Ohio State that capped off the previous year.

1997 (SEC Champions, Bowl Alliance) to 1998

  • 1997 Final Poll: 7
  • 1998 Preseason: 10
  • 1998 Final Poll: 1

The Vols were ranked third in the next-to-last AP poll of 1997 before getting blown away by #2 Nebraska in the Orange Bowl, a game that would’ve been for the national title if Michigan had lost the day before. Manning and his cohort left for the NFL. Fun fact: 10th was the lowest the Vols had been ranked in the preseason poll in four years.

It mattered little: this bunch finally beat Florida and ran the table, winning the national championship.

1998 (National Champions) to 1999

  • 1998 Final Poll: 1
  • 1999 Preseason: 2
  • 1999 Final Poll: 9

And a lot of those dudes were back the next year. The Vols gave up five sacks to Alex Brown in The Swamp, but were still ranked second in the BCS on November 8. Alas: Clint Stoerner got his revenge, with Arkansas knocking the Vols out of the national championship conversation. Nebraska beat them in the Fiesta Bowl for a 9-3 finish.

2001 (Opportunity to play for BCS title) to 2002

  • 2001 Final Poll: 4
  • 2002 Preseason: 5
  • 2002 Final Poll: NR

Man, that sentence about 2001 does indeed hurt a little less, at least to me, when you just beat Nick Saban.

Injuries and weirdness struck in 2002, the first truly disappointing season in Knoxville in almost 15 years. The Vols fumbled 134581740 times in the rain against Florida, the first of five losses, all to Top 20 opponents. Casey Clausen missed time after Tennessee’s six overtime win against Arkansas, the Vols caught the Miami superpower on the schedule, etc. A Peach Bowl blowout loss to Maryland put the stamp on a frustrating season, but Tennessee won 10 games each of the next two years.

So…what did we learn?

  • All six of these teams started in the Top 10 in preseason. The 2023 Vols are 10th in 247’s consensus Top 25 from late March. Other than the 2016 Vols, who opened the year at #9, Tennessee hasn’t landed in the Top 20 of a preseason poll since 2008.
  • Only the 1998 Vols finished higher than their predecessors. It’s hard to do when those are your predecessors! If you asked fans right now to take the over/under on finishing 6th in the final poll of 2023? Our spring expected win total of 8.65 regular season victories suggests an understanding that improving on last year isn’t necessarily at the top of our wish list.
  • Two of these teams finished unranked, but the other four all finished in the Top 10. That’s program building, and it’s an interesting question for Josh Heupel in year three. The two groups that finished unranked were 1986 and 2002, coming before and after Tennessee’s “decade” of dominance from 1989-2001. So even though seasons like 1996 and 1999 may have had their disappointments, they still ended in the Top 10, and the Vols were still in the promised land, so to speak.

Where will the 2023 Vols start and finish? And can they show the program-building strength that can carry Tennessee into the College Football Playoff conversation every year?

Ranking the 2022 Offense Through the NFL Draft

Tennessee tied its second-best mark with five players taken in the first three rounds of the NFL Draft last weekend. The 2023 draft class joined 2007, 2002, 1998, and 1992 at that mark, trailing only the 2000 draft class with a boatload of players from the 1998 national champions. That draft saw eight Vols taken in the first three rounds, the clear program record.

The history major in me really enjoyed this stat from Jesse Simonton:

My first question: “Has Tennessee ever done this?”

If you use the starting lineups from the media guide in the seven-round draft era since 1994, the answer is…almost. The vaunted 1998 champs had nine starters drafted from its defense. Three years later, the 2001 defense had eight “official” starters drafted plus Teddy Gaines.

The 2022 Vols put four players from its record-breaking offense in the first three rounds. How does that compare to the best the Vols have done from that side of the ball in the draft?

You have to go back ten years to find the nearest context:

  • 2012: Cordarrelle Patterson (R1), Justin Hunter (R2), Dallas Thomas (R3), Mychal Rivera (R6), plus Ja’Wuan James (R1) and Zach Fulton (R6) from the 2014 draft

This is Tennessee’s last position group to have two players taken in the first round…for now. CBS Sports has Javontez Spraggins in the first round of their 2024 mock draft. If he, Bru McCoy, any of the running backs or any others from last year’s starting lineup are taken next April, the 2022 offense will start reaching back even farther:

  • 2001: Donte Stallworth (R1), Fred Weary (R3), Travis Stephens (R4), Reggie Coleman (R6), plus Kelley Washington (R3) and Jason Witten (R3) from the 2003 draft, plus Scott Wells (R7) from the 2004 draft.

Seven players from the 2001 offense makes for a strong total picture for that group, with 15 starters drafted overall. On one side of the ball, seven players from the 2005 defense were also drafted.

No surprise: it remains the 1998 national champs who have the overall record in the modern era, with those nine defensive starters joining seven offensive starters to make 16 overall draft picks from that starting lineup.

If you’re looking for the most impressive group on offense, you’ve gotta go back one more year:

  • 1997: Peyton Manning (R1), Marcus Nash (R1), Trey Teague (R7), plus Peerless Price (R2) and Shawn Bryson (R3) from the 1999 draft, plus Jamal Lewis (R1), Chad Clifton (R2), and Cosey Coleman (R2) from the 2000 draft.

That’s eight starters from the 1997 SEC Champions, plus a non-official starter in WR Andy McCullough, taken in the seventh round in 1998. Three first rounders, three second rounders, and a third round pick. Chad Clifton made two Pro Bowls, Jamal Lewis won the MVP, and Peyton’s in the Hall of Fame. Cosey Coleman was a starter on Tampa’s Super Bowl team. And both Shawn Bryson and Peerless Price played 7+ seasons in the league.

Not bad.

So from this perspective, the 1997 offense sets the bar on that side of the ball, and the 1998 defense earns its reputation as the top unit overall. But here again, the 2022 group has already done things we haven’t seen around here in 10+ years…and with another strong season from some of its returning starters, could find itself in more of the same elite program history at Tennessee.

Go Vols.

Vols in the NFL Draft: Best Available History

When I was a kid, I watched the NFL Draft from almost start to finish every year. And the only reason why was the Vols: nine players selected in 1991, nine again in 1992. Even when the draft was shortened to seven rounds, the Vols put 14 names on the board in 1995 and 1996 combined.

There’s a depth component to that Tennessee is still trying to build overall today. But in the early rounds, and especially on offense? You’ve got a chance to see it just about as good as it’s ever been done at Tennessee this weekend.

Here are the most recent comparisons overall; as with just about everything else regarding the 2022 Vols, it’s been awhile:

The Last Time…

  • Three players taken in the first three rounds: 2017 (Derek Barnett, Alvin Kamara, Cam Sutton)
  • Three players taken in the first two rounds: 2010 (Eric Berry, Dan Williams, Montario Hardesty)
  • Four players taken in the first three rounds: 2007 (Justin Harrell, Robert Meachem, Arron Sears, Turk McBride, Jonathan Wade)
  • Four players taken in the first two rounds: 2007 (Harrell, Meachem, Sears, McBride)
  • Three players taken in the first round: 2002 (John Henderson, Donte Stallworth, Albert Haynesworth)

If we get to that last benchmark – Darnell Wright, Hendon Hooker, and Jalin Hyatt all have first round mocks out there – it would tie the UT record. Along with 2002, three Tennessee players were taken in the first round in 1998 (Peyton Manning, Terry Fair, Marcus Nash) and 1991 (Charles McRae, Antone Davis, Alvin Harper).

And if both Byron Young and Cedric Tillman join Hooker, Hyatt, and Wright in the first three rounds? You’d have five players taken in the first three rounds for the first time since 2007, and just the sixth time ever:

Five Players Taken in the First Three Rounds:

  • 2007: Justin Harrell, Robert Meachem, Arron Sears, Turk McBride, Jonathan Wade
  • 2002: John Henderson, Donte Stallworth, Albert Haynesworth, Fred Weary, Will Overstreet
  • 2000: Jamal Lewis, Shaun Ellis, Raynoch Thompson, Chad Clifton, Dwayne Goodrich, Cosey Coleman, Deon Grant, Darwin Walker (that’s eight from the 1998 national champions)
  • 1998: Peyton Manning, Terry Fair, Marcus Nash, Leonard Little, Jonathan Brown
  • 1992: Dale Carter, Chris Mims, Carl Pickens, Chuck Smith, Jeremy Lincoln

Once again: other than the 1998 national champions, you can put the 2022 Vols in the conversation with any other modern era team at Tennessee. On-field success is getting ready to translate into the NFL.

Go Vols.

First Draft of 2023 Expectations

Plug in the win total machine and what do you get? A fitting 8.65 expected regular season wins for the Vols in 2023. That would make 9-3 our most expected outcome this fall.

We’ve been running this thing since 2017, making this easily the highest total we’ve seen in terms of preseason expectations:

  • 2017: 7.94
  • 2018: 6.65
  • 2019: 6.55
  • 2020: 5.40 (10 game schedule)
  • 2021: 6.74
  • 2022: 8.10
  • 2023: 8.65

Good news for Josh Heupel: he’s two-for-two on the over.

Here’s the game by game breakdown from our fan community:

  • vs Virginia: 81.5%
  • Austin Peay: 98.5%
  • at Florida: 63.9%
  • UTSA: 92.0%
  • South Carolina: 73.2%
  • Texas A&M: 65%
  • at Alabama: 32.9%
  • at Kentucky: 67.8%
  • UConn: 91.6%
  • at Missouri: 75.6%
  • Georgia: 33.0%
  • Vanderbilt: 90.1%

A couple of things that jump out on the first pass:

We view the odds at Alabama & vs Georgia to be equal

The week of the Alabama game last year, fans gave the Vols at 38.3% chance of victory. That number rose to 46.1% to win in Athens the week of that showdown. If the Vols do their part, be assured the numbers will rise as we approach kickoff.

From April, these are the healthiest numbers against these two since we’ve been running the win total machine, by far. Last year in Week 1, fans gave the Vols a 19.8% chance to beat Bama and a 22.6% chance to beat Georgia.

What is Tennessee’s third-most difficult game?

The numbers say it’s still our friends from Gainesville, in what largely appears to be our final annual meeting after seeing each other every fall since 1990. Florida joins the triumvirate with Texas A&M and at Kentucky for the three games most likely to produce Tennessee’s third loss, if you believe Alabama and Georgia will be one and two.

A projection that avoids the word “rebuild” and would court the word “playoff” in 2024

This, again, is the most important part. Tennessee is getting ready to send a boatload of players to the NFL Draft; we’ll talk more about that next week. But Josh Heupel and crew have recruited and developed well enough to not expect Tennessee to fall off the face of the earth, or even entertain the idea of a rebuilding year after an 11-2 finish. It’s a win higher than what we projected in 2017 after the 2016 squad sent the last boatload to the NFL.

And a season where you think 9-3 is your most likely outcome is probably one win to the positive away from a 12-team playoff, if you’re 10-2 in the SEC. If such a thing existed in 2023, we’d be telling ourselves we had a shot. That’s the real prize that 2022 created for us. So while we’re not talking about playoffs in 2023 until we see what we can do with Alabama, Georgia, and the rest?

We’re in the right conversation overall.

Go Vols.

The 2023 Expected Win Total Machine

Hello, old friend.

With spring practice behind us, we unveil the first edition of our Expected Win Total Machine. Last season, we found running it after the Orange & White Game produced almost exactly the same result as running it the week before kickoff. Perhaps that would change if you had a quarterback battle extending into fall camp, but until that’s the case, we like putting it out here now to help take the temperature for season expectations.

Last year, those numbers were 8.10 expected wins after spring practice, and 8.03 when the Ball State game kicked off. You may recall it dropped to 7.93 the week of the Pittsburgh game, which means headed in to Week 2 we thought 7-5 was ever so slightly more likely than 9-3.

And then this happened:

This, coupled with Tennessee’s win over Clemson in the Orange Bowl, gave us our first unanimously great season in 15 years, and perhaps our “best” season since 2001. It was on par with just about anything that wasn’t 1998, and created the expectation that Tennessee’s program can be in the hunt when the 12-team playoff begins in 2024.

Until then, we’ve got one more run at the four-team format, and one last season with the SEC East on the line. I doubt we’ll see the Vols projected to finish with the kind of win total that suggests we think UT will overtake Georgia. But part of the fun of this exercise is seeing the percentages for each game. What kind of odds will we give the Vols against the defending champs? In Tuscaloosa? How high will our confidence go in taking revenge on South Carolina?

Find out all those answers here. Enter the percentage chance you give Tennessee to win each game, then hit submit to find out your regular season expected win total, and enter your total into our community database. We’ll be back later this week with the initial results.

How good do you have to be on the other side of the ball?

In basketball, Tennessee just finished as the number one defense in KenPom, their third consecutive Top 5 finish there. Outside of how the 2023 Vols looked night-to-night due to injuries, the real question there was about the gap between offensive and defensive efficiency. How good do these teams need to be offensively when they’re this good on defense? The Vols were undefeated when holding teams under 60 points, but what about beyond that?

If you look at Tennessee’s NCAA Tournament teams, you’ll find the search for balance can run both ways:

Tennessee NCAA Tournament Teams in KenPom Rank

YearOffenseDefenseDifference
202364163
202235332
202185580
201934239
201836630
201415194
2011904347
2010751164
2009208363
2008152813
2007225533
200687264

Obviously a small total in the difference column by itself doesn’t tell you much; you could be bad at both and do that. But a few things that jump out to me here:

  • The biggest gap is the covid season, which was also the Rick Barnes team that relied most on true freshmen – not a huge surprise
  • Note how a couple of these teams flipped their strength with much of the same roster: the 2009 and 2010 seasons went from offense-first to defense-first, then in 2018 and 2019 the Vols did the opposite
  • In these 12 seasons, the Vols were strongest on the offensive side five times, and on the defensive side seven times. Barnes’ teams tend to lean defense, Pearl’s teams started offense-first but shifted the other way his last two years. And while Cuonzo’s first season in 2012 featured an offense rated 106th, by his last season here in 2014 the Vols were incredibly balanced.

So, the question: when you’re so good at the one, how good do you need to be at the other?

At Virginia, it took Tony Bennett four seasons to make the NCAA Tournament. When they did as a 10-seed in 2012, the Cavs finished fifth in KenPom defense and 133rd in offense. Two years later, UVA arrived on the national scene as a one-seed. They were fourth in defense…and 27th in offense. In their run from 2014 through the 2019 national championship, they had a Top 10 defense every year…but only once finished outside the Top 30 in offense. So while the first-pass impression was always about their defense, their offense was plenty good enough. Those six seasons led to three Sweet 16s, two Elite 8s, one loss to a 16 seed…and a national championship.

For Tennessee, I’m sure the first impression will always be defense first. And, even in a time when offense tends to lead for national champions, I’m more than okay with defense being first when the defense is this good. You just need the other part to be…”good enough”? I think Barnes and all these guys would tell you just “enough” isn’t what they’re going for. You need a group you can have some confidence in on the other end of the floor.

You know me, we’re all about that intersection of feelings and data: when we look at the KenPom list, the teams you felt best about had a good balance to them. Teams that were in the Top 50 in both categories include 2018, 2019, and 2022 under Barnes. With Pearl, the 2008 team hit that benchmark, while the 2010 team was playing at that level once back to full strength. I would imagine the same would go for the 2007 squad if you removed the games Chris Lofton missed with an ankle injury.

Who in the world knows exactly what next season’s roster will look like yet. But I appreciate Bart Torvik’s site for having fun anyway with early 2024 projections. That’s where you’ll again find the Vols projected to have the best defense in the land, and an offense rated 69th. (Torvik had the Vols at 57th offensively this past season.) How good is good enough? How much confidence will next season’s team instill on the offensive side of the ball.

Speaking of good enough:

Tennessee Bowl Eligible Teams in SP+ Rank

YearOffenseDefenseDifference
202223028
202174740
2019731954
2016154429
2015311318
2014532330
201044484
2009291712
2007173316
2006123319

On the eve of the Orange & White Game, you’ll note that the 2023 SP+ projections pick the Vols to finish second in offense and 32nd in defense, an almost identical finish to last year.

When your offense is this good, how good is good enough defensively? And likewise, I’m sure Josh Heupel, Tim Banks, and all these guys are interested in much more than just “enough”. In SP+, you’ll note that last year’s defense, South Carolina included and all that, still finished stronger on the season than some of the “If we only had a little better defense!” groups from 2016 or 2007. They weren’t bad, by any stretch of the imagination; I would say a Top 30 unit, especially coming from one that finished 47th the year before, is drifting toward the “good” department.

Will it get there this fall? There are plenty of questions on the other side of the ball, starting with, “Can Tennessee still have one of the two best offenses in the nation after saying goodbye to all these early round draft picks?”.

But I think the best news for Tennessee, in both sports, is the way we’re in the neighborhood of having the right kind of excellence on both sides of the ball. We felt it in basketball in the 2022 season. And we could be one step closer to seeing it take place in football this fall.

Go Vols.

Tennessee’s season through the eyes of the final AP poll

Some years you get pretty good clarity on who the best team is, and last night will certainly qualify for Georgia. As back-to-back champs, it has essentially always been them this season. I always try to view these things through the eyes of, “What helps Tennessee most?” – the Dawgs looking dominant does help put November 5 in Athens in better context. It also will create an entirely new rhythm in 2023 on our schedule, one final shift before it all begins anew in 2024: Georgia comes to Neyland Stadium in the next-to-last week of the regular season this fall. If the Dawgs stay on track as the team to beat, we’ll see what the Vols can do with that opportunity at the finish line.

Tennessee finishes sixth in the AP poll, one spot and nine votes behind Alabama. The head-to-head police are already out with warrants. But it would be equally silly for us to spend any time feeling somehow lesser than about this magical year because of the nonsense of a handful of voters. There is much still to celebrate.

In the post-Fulmer era, the Vols had just six wins over teams who finished the season ranked in 12 years from 2009-2020:

  • 2011 #25 Cincinnati
  • 2013 #4 South Carolina
  • 2015 #23 Northwestern
  • 2016 #14 Florida
  • 2016 #16 Virginia Tech
  • 2018 #12 Kentucky

Josh Heupel’s first team added #18 Kentucky to the list in 2021.

We already knew these Vols tied 1998 with six wins over ranked teams during the season. Sometimes that stat gets mocked – lol Kentucky wasn’t really a big win – but I always think that misses the point. All those years without many ranked wins helped teach us a central truth of sports (and probably life): don’t miss opportunities to celebrate. Ranked wins matter most on the Saturday they happen, when they are also most enjoyable. When the Vols beat Florida, none of us thought to ourselves, “Well, hold on, let’s see how they finish the season.”

Now that we have seen how they all finished the season?

Six wins over teams who finished the year ranked from 2009-20. One more last year.

And four in 2022.

That puts this team in company with, you guessed it: 1997, 1998, and 2001. Since the AP poll went to 25 teams in 1989, those are the only Vol squads to beat at least four teams who finished the season ranked:

  • 1997: #5 UCLA, #10 Georgia, #11 Auburn, #22 Ole Miss
  • 1998: #3 Florida State, #5 Florida, #14 Georgia, #16 Arkansas, #25 Syracuse
  • 2001: #3 Florida, #7 LSU, #13 South Carolina, #14 Syracuse, #20 Michigan
  • 2022: #5 Alabama, #13 Clemson, #16 LSU, #22 Pittsburgh

Alabama’s erroneous finish in the top five does give Tennessee its eighth win over a final top five team in that same span:

  • 2007 #2 Georgia
  • 1998 #3 Florida State
  • 2001 #3 Florida
  • 2013 #4 South Carolina
  • 1997 #5 UCLA
  • 1998 #5 Florida
  • 2003 #5 Miami
  • 2022 #5 Alabama

I love the hypothetical history questions like, “Who’s the best team Tennessee has ever beaten?” In the Top 25 era, I think I’m going with 2001 Florida on this list; our story at Rocky Top Talk from 2016 also placed them atop the list using SP+. The 2022 Alabama squad wasn’t necessarily in the championship chase in December like those Gators and Vols. But they were, of course, two plays away from an undefeated season. And going back and watching our game – as I’m sure you’ll continue to do many times – you marvel at Bryce Young’s performance.

If you’re ranking the best teams you’ve ever seen us beat? The 2022 Alabama team is on that list. And this team also got three other ranked foes.

By any definition, it was an incredible year for Tennessee. The Vols would’ve been in a 12-team playoff. And in all the way-too-earlies you’ll come across today, you’ll find the 2023 squad projected to be right back in that hypothetical conversation.

That’s the greatest gift of this team. And they did it so well, especially at the end against Clemson, they made you believe they can do it again.

Go Vols.

Milton and the defense were even better than you think

(I do love this photo.)

The two biggest questions coming into the Orange Bowl surrounded Tennessee’s uncertainty at quarterback and on defense. Both looked great against Vanderbilt, but Clemson – both by virtue of its #7 ranking and its name – would be another test entirely.

In winning 31-14, both Joe Milton and the Vol defense did more than enough. But the way the possessions played out made it feel a bit different than what we’re used to seeing. Tennessee punted eight times, and Clemson had, you know, 123572148 drives into Tennessee territory.

But, as usual, the story of the game is best told play-for-play. And for both Joe Milton and Tennessee’s defense, the results look even better compared to what we’ve seen before.

Joe Milton vs Clemson & Non-Hendon Hooker Games at UT

Tough acts to follow here aren’t always what they appear; we already know that from Peyton Manning handing off to Tee Martin. But no matter what Joe Milton or any Tennessee quarterback does in the next few years, our appreciation for Hendon Hooker should only grow.

Against Clemson, Joe Milton was 19-of-28 for 251 yards, 9.0 yards per attempt. We’re already spoiled on the “no interceptions” part; Milton added three touchdowns for good measure.

In yards per attempt, Hooker had an amazing ability to shine brightest on the biggest stages. He crossed 9+ yards per attempt 11 times against power five competition the last two years, including seven times against ranked foes:

Hendon Hooker YPA vs Ranked Teams

  1. 21 Kentucky: 15.8
  2. 22 Alabama: 12.8
  3. 22 Florida: 12.5
  4. 21 Alabama: 10.1
  5. 22 Kentucky: 9.8
  6. 21 Florida: 9.6
  7. 21 Ole Miss: 9.0

While the 2021 Kentucky game was an insane example of contrasting styles, it’s Hooker’s ability to be at his very, very best against our two biggest rivals that should be remembered most here. There will be plenty of opportunities to come back to this point, especially as he prepares for the NFL Draft.

Maybe every quarterback will start putting up numbers like this in Josh Heupel’s offense at Tennessee; if so, great! But don’t discount what Joe Milton did against Clemson just because it’s not what Hendon Hooker did against Florida and Alabama.

Before Heupel, how often did Tennessee quarterbacks throw for 9+ yards per attempt against ranked teams?

Jarrett Guarantano did it against Auburn in 2018 (10.3). Josh Dobbs did it against Florida in 2016 (10.0). And, in the post-Fulmer era, that’s it.

Hitting 9+ yards per attempt overall from 2009-2020 was rare; I count just 15 times it happened vs power five competition in those 12 seasons. For Milton to have done it against Clemson’s defense with essentially the 2023 wide receiver corps? That’s very good news.

Yards Per Play Allowed & Clemson’s Offense

The news is indeed good on the other side of the ball as well. Clemson’s 484 total yards came on 101 total plays. That’s 4.79 yards per play.

How does that compare to Tennessee’s defensive performances this season?

In yards per play allowed vs power five competition, Tennessee’s defense looks like this:

  1. Kentucky 3.25
  2. Vanderbilt 3.30
  3. Clemson 4.79
  4. LSU 4.86
  5. Pittsburgh 5.0
  6. Missouri 5.56
  7. Georgia 6.24
  8. Florida 6.83
  9. Alabama 6.86
  10. South Carolina 7.97

That’s pretty good, especially compared to the way it looked two games earlier. And for Clemson’s offense on the entire year? The 4.79 yards per play they gained against UT’s defense represented their second-lowest total of the year, behind the 4.32 they had at Notre Dame. And against power five competition, their season-high total was the 6.88 they had against North Carolina in the ACC Championship Game, with Cade Klubnik doing most of the work.

So for both Joe Milton and Tennessee’s defense, performances that might’ve felt like they had room for improvement look really, really good when put into context. The Vol defense was as good as anyone against a Clemson offense coming off its best game. And Joe Milton was as good through the air as just about anyone not named Hendon Hooker against a ranked foe.

The future is bright, in part because the Orange Bowl looks even brighter.

The Other Side of the Desert

So here’s the thing: I’ve never actually written about a Good Football Team before. (For reference: I wrote from 2009 to 2017 or so, give or take a few months. I think. Memory is hazy these days.) Sure, you could argue the first half of Tennessee’s 2016 was a good team; on the other hand, that team gave us Champions of Life. I don’t think I can count that. I enjoyed 2012 way more than anyone had any right to but that team wasn’t good. (I’m not not planning on writing a Milton vs. Bray Tale of the Tape in ::checks calendar:: June? Man, being good at a lot of sports now is weird.)

2007? That season was hilarious and I will always enjoy the drive-it-like-you-stole-it ness of everything after Georgia, but I hadn’t started writing yet. 2001 and 1998 pre-date my Tennessee fandom; they aren’t really my teams in the way they’re Will or Joel’s (or your) teams.

Is there any other season pre-Heupel that would fit? I don’t think so; we had Good Football Moments, but not really Good Football Team.

Enter 2022, or rather, enter 2021 then look behind you. Pruitt wasn’t going to work out; regardless of the process that led us to Pruitt, you can’t run the 2012 Alabama playbook with less talent in 2018 and expect better results; even Alabama wasn’t running the 2012 Alabama playbook.  I still think the process ended up in as good a place as we could’ve hoped for, even if we ended up as College Football Twitter’s main character for a solid three weeks. Regardless: brunch and a desire to just move on did Pruitt in; another season or two would’ve done the trick.

Anyway, back to 2021. What did I know about Josh Heupel? Well, his teams were fun to watch; I probably watched more UCF than I did Tennessee for a year, maybe two. UCF games were reliably fun for a neutral and the 12 lead changes in almost every game didn’t matter to me since I didn’t really root for UCF. Would I call those UCF teams good? Eh. They were fine, and they were fun, and honestly during the Pruitt era “fine” and “fun” were enough for me to turn Heupel into appointment viewing.

And hey, that’s what 2021 was! It was fun, and it was fine. Watching Heupel’s teams a little more closely made me realize he tries to coach teams with a high floor; run enough plays and be successful enough to score on a couple more possessions than your opponent and that’ll be enough to beat most teams you have more talent than.  For all Tennessee’s struggles, there was still talent. The questions were twofold: 1) could Heupel recruit enough to raise the talent floor? 2) could Heupel get teams that had more talent? We saw flashes of the latter—Georgia 2021 being the best example, even if they were never winning that game—but we didn’t know if that was going to be anything past a flash.

I thought going into 2022 that 8-4 would be, you know, pretty good! We might be able to hang with Alabama or Georgia for a half but we weren’t deep enough, and I guess Kentucky or LSU or Florida are good so maybe beat one of them too, win the rest, and we can call that momentum. That sounds good, right?

Well.

About that.

It didn’t really start to click with me this Tennessee team was a Good Football Team until the third quarter of the Alabama game. That timing is a little weird, right? They blitzed LSU (and we didn’t think that LSU was any good until November, so while ending the LSU game before noon Central time was impressive we didn’t know if it was good, beat Florida but in a way that really didn’t feel comfortable, and even the first half against Alabama was the kind of early-game carnage we had seen before.

But the third quarter? That’s when I realized Alabama was emptying the tank against us. They didn’t have a choice if they wanted to win the game; that’s when I realized we belonged. We were a Good Football Team.

Of course, we know how that game ended, and we know what it feels like to be back at the top of the mountain, if only for a few days. Yeah, it was only a few days, and yep South Carolina sucked (it looked like a Madden-style No Way Game), but 10-2? That’s pretty good. 

Demolishing Vanderbilt after losing Hendon Hooker? Proof of concept this is sustainable. We didn’t necessarily need to know that, but another hallmark of a Good Football Team is being able to handle key losses.

While we’re here: beating Clemson was ….comfortable? As comfortable as three missed field goals by Clemson could be considered comfortable. It felt unhurried, like the team knew how to play to win instead of playing to not lose. Will talked about this a lot already; I’ll come back to it once I knock some of the rust off.

I have no idea where it goes from here; it looks sustainable and I don’t think it’ll stop being fun, but it’s worth looking back to remember how far we came. This whole Good Football Team is pretty new for a lot of us; it’s okay to take some time to reflect.