What’s a Reasonable Expectation Now?

It’s fine by me to keep talking about basketball, even though Tuesday’s press conference raised eyebrows instead of what I’m sure was the intended alternative. Rick Barnes, perhaps honest to a fault in this case, said he’d probably be the coach at UCLA if the Bruins worked out his buyout from Tennessee.

They didn’t, and he’s still the coach at Tennessee for somewhere north of $4.5 million per year. That makes him the third-highest paid coach in college basketball at the moment. UCLA is on a short list of programs with the kind of opportunity to steal a coach from a place like Tennessee. But with the Vols paying this much money, now they’re on that list too.

With new territory comes new expectations: what kind of return should one expect on this kind of investment?

Tennessee, as you know, has never been to the Final Four and has one Elite Eight appearance. The Vols do have five Sweet 16 appearances since 2007; only a dozen programs have more in that span. But there is obviously both room for a postseason breakthrough, and the expectation that such a thing will happen.

As for the tournament itself, there are a couple of ways to look at it in Tennessee’s history:

  • Since expansion to 64 in 1985: 14 appearances (40%)
  • Since Jerry Green’s arrival in 1998: 13 appearances (59.1%)
  • Since Bruce Pearl’s arrival in 2006: 9 appearances (64.3%)

This is who the Vols already are; since Pearl they’ve made the tournament roughly two out of three years, and the Sweet 16 one out of three.

Here is the company Tennessee has paid to join, using the top salaries from the USA Today database and each team’s track record over the last decade:

Championship Programs

TeamCoachSalaryNCAAS16E8F4NCConf Title
UKCalipari9.28987415
DukeCoach K7.051075221
Mich StIzzo4.151064304
UVABennett4.15732114
KansasSelf4.071065209
LouisvilleMack4.07843212
UNCWilliams3.93964215
VillanovaWright3.88922225

Reaching beyond this last decade, Izzo won a title in 2000 and Self in 2008, giving each of these eight programs a national championship this century, all won by the current coach other than Chris Mack at Louisville. It’s not a prerequisite for a Top 10 salary: in addition to Mack, Bennett was the fourth-highest paid coach before winning his a week ago. But it’s certainly an impressive group, which includes every championship program since 2003 (Syracuse, where Jim Boeheim only makes $2.7 million) other than Florida (who lost Billy Donovan to the NBA) and UConn (who lost Jim Calhoun to retirement).

This group makes the NCAA Tournament 90% of the time. It became an every year expectation for the Vols under Bruce Pearl, and Barnes – who made the tournament 94% of the time at Texas – is recruiting well enough to build the same expectation at Tennessee.

This group makes the Sweet 16 more than half the time. The bluest of these bloods – Duke, Kansas, Kentucky, Michigan State, and North Carolina – have all been at least six times in the last decade. Virginia has been three times in the last six years under Tony Bennett. Villanova somehow only went twice, but cashed it all in both times.

Seven of these eight teams made the Final Four at least twice in the last decade. And the eighth is the team who just won it all.

If this feels like too big of a jump from where Tennessee is as a program right now, here are the next three highest paid coaches:

Almost There

TeamCoachSalaryNCAAS16E8F4NCConf Title
West VirginiaHuggins3.87741100
MichiganBeilein3.80853202
Wichita StMarshall3.57721105

(Not included: Utah’s Larry Krystowiak, also at $3.57 million, being paid for a bigger jump than Tennessee is looking at.)

These three programs make the tournament 73% of the time and the Sweet 16 36.7% of the time, basically what the Vols have done since Pearl. If Tennessee had a single Final Four breakthrough, its program would clearly belong in this tier already; the Vols were already paying Barnes $3.25 million, so Tennessee wasn’t far off.

This comparison suggests this is what the Vols are paying for: an expectation to be in the NCAA Tournament every year, to be in the Sweet 16 more often than not, and to break through to the Final Four. Tennessee’s recent history – both since Pearl and in the last two years under Barnes – already gave the Vols all the pieces to belong in that next tier, minus the Final Four appearance. Now the Vols have paid their way into the top tier. Barnes knows how these expectations work, having seen both sides of them at Texas. In a sense, so did Fulmer at Tennessee. And all parties involved should be excited to have them in our lives.

What Season Is This?

Isn’t this the quietest spring practice you can remember?

It lacks the shiny new things that tend to make the most noise this time of year – new coach, new quarterback – and even the new offensive coordinator isn’t really new. Tennessee’s freshmen most likely to make an impact are offensive linemen. There are plenty of things keeping April low-key that have nothing to do with Tennessee’s record last year.

Can we still call the expectations lowered? The Vols are 67-70 in their last 11 seasons, 4-8 in 2017 and 5-7 last year. Jeremy Pruitt made progress in year one, no doubt, but I don’t think anyone expects a leap back to the national elite in year two. The Vols still haven’t gone 9-3 in the regular season since 2007, and haven’t finished a season with less than four losses since 2004. If the Vols can find defensive linemen, we should see progress again this year. I’m just not sure we’re going to find defensive linemen in the Orange & White Game.

Lots of words will be written about the attendance by Monday. Maybe Pruitt will continue to implore fans to show up. The Vols have a wait-and-see fan base at the moment, and rightfully so. It’s how the Butch Jones era started too until he recruited his way out of it; Pruitt probably gets less credit for his first full class in that department because it lacked the in-state and legacy connections that were available to Jones in 2014, but the 2019 class is actually better in blue chip ratio.

But even if things are wait-and-see, this feels different than before. And I think that has a lot to do with Jim Chaney, Phillip Fulmer…and Rick Barnes.

Five years ago, we were hoping a coach who went 5-7 in his first year with a memorable win and some frustrating losses could turn things around. We knew who Jones was at Cincinnati. We were still getting to know Dave Hart. And the glory we were trying to return to was a little closer in the rear view.

We’re still figuring out who Jeremy Pruitt is. The first year results were one step in the right direction. But it’s not just knowing who Chaney and Fulmer are: the additional trust that comes with their stability is considerable. And this week, Tennessee made an enormous commitment to stability in men’s basketball.

The USA Today database of coaching salaries continues to be an excellent resource. As we wrote earlier this week, I wasn’t surprised Barnes stayed at Tennessee over going to UCLA, but was delighted to find the Vols would pay him UCLA money. This not only puts Barnes, for the moment, behind only Calipari and Coach K, but puts Tennessee’s athletic department on a very short list.

According to the USA Today database only seven schools pay their football and men’s basketball coach $3.5+ million dollars: Kentucky, Michigan, Michigan State, Tennessee, Texas A&M, Virginia, and Utah.

Tennessee currently ranks 12th in combined head coach salaries:

TeamFootballBasketballTotal
Kentucky49.213.2
Michigan7.53.811.3
Texas A&M7.53.811.3
Alabama8.32.510.8
Georgia6.63.29.8
Duke2.579.5
Auburn6.72.69.3
Clemson6.22.89
Texas5.53.28.7
Michigan State4.44.28.6
Florida62.68.6
Tennessee3.84.88.6
Oklahoma4.83.28
Illinois52.97.9
South Carolina4.837.8
Virginia3.54.27.7
Ohio State4.537.5
Nebraska52.57.5
TCU4.82.67.4
Florida State52.37.3
Utah3.83.57.3
UCLA3.347.3
Louisville3.2547.25
Iowa4.72.37
Kansas2.846.8

If Pruitt gets Tennessee where Tennessee wants to go, he’ll make more than $3.8 million per year. So the Vols have room to grow on the athletic department leaderboard. But in the football/basketball marriage, Tennessee is in very good company.

Stability on this level in basketball creates trust that, even if Jordan Bone and Grant Williams go pro, the Vols can still be in the hunt. Barnes and these players earned that expectation the last two years, and Tennessee’s recruiting continues it going forward. Pruitt’s recruiting is getting there going forward; we’ll see how far they go on the field this fall.

But don’t be fooled by low attendance or what feels lowered expectations (which really just means reasonable expectations at this point in football). Tennessee is building a healthier athletic department. The Vols have more stability in more important jobs than at any point in the last 11 years. And as we just saw this week, when health and stability lead to more winning, Tennessee will pay for that too.

Basketball School

The last sentence of the last thing I wrote about Tennessee on Friday was, “There is as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball right now than at any point in my lifetime.”

This was immediately tested, of course. The point of that piece on Friday was to not pretend bad things always happen to Tennessee just because good things were happening to Bruce Pearl. But we are definitely no stranger to ye olde time of testing.

On some level it felt like an accomplishment that a coach would even consider staying at Tennessee when the alternative is UCLA. Because that coach is Rick Barnes at age 64, I think most of us also believed staying at Tennessee was the better fit all along.

But as the hours stretched on – and it’s remarkable how this whole thing happened in right at 24 hours but felt like so much more – the narrative of Tennessee’s commitment to basketball moved to the forefront. I wasn’t thinking about matching UCLA dollar for dollar; those dollars still go further in Knoxville, and are now unnecessary at an impressive assortment of local restaurants. It began to feel more about what a basketball program could be worth at a football school. Especially a good basketball program at what used to be a great football school.

If Barnes simply said yes to an enormous salary a program like UCLA could offer but Tennessee could not, so be it, I told myself. But with the conversation seemingly focused on Tennessee’s overall commitment to basketball, including assistant salaries and the program’s place in the athletic department, it became a telling moment for Phillip Fulmer and the narrative of Tennessee basketball.

My teams have had a really good run over the course of my life. The Braves won the World Series when I was 14, the Vols a national championship at 17. I grew up in the immediate aftermath of the Celtics’ three titles in the 80’s, then watched them win another when I was 26. And for the most part, really until the last decade of Tennessee football, my teams were really well run and competitive on the highest levels. Only three championships, but plenty of seasons in the conversation.

Because of that, there’s a part of me that pulls for Tennessee basketball the hardest. Basketball is my favorite sport. But college basketball is also the one where my favorite team had the most room to grow, as my fandom came of age during the Wade Houston era. There were individual runs with the 2000-01 teams and Cuonzo Martin’s last season. But the long-term trust my other favorite teams earned has really only been available for Tennessee basketball twice in my 37 years. One was at the tail end of Bruce Pearl’s tenure in 2010, the post-Chris Lofton run to the Elite Eight solidifying his ability to make Tennessee, as he said then and says now about Auburn, a Top 25 program instead of a Top 25 team.

But then Pearl was gone by his own hand a year later. Anyone who’s spent any time reading me through the years knows I love Cuonzo Martin. But that hire at the time – three years at Missouri State, zero NCAA Tournament appearances – wasn’t a Top 25 program hire.

Then Rick Barnes re-established that long-term trust over the last two years. Tennessee was back in the Top 25 program conversation, with NCAA Tournament seeds built for the second weekend. McDonald’s All-Americans were signing here again. And Barnes carried none of the baggage of scandal and investigation. After a decade of instability, things suddenly seemed so safe: Fulmer in the big job, Jim Chaney running the offense, and Barnes the safest bet of all.

And then all of a sudden it seemed like he might leave, and it felt like the whole program was in jeopardy again. Because we’re not just a football school, we’re a football school where the football team is 67-70 in the last 11 years. Perhaps a football school could only be committed to basketball when football is doing well. Or even if that wasn’t the case and Barnes just took the UCLA money, would we/could we pay someone new to stay on the same level? And what names are on that list when you’re hiring a week after everyone else? The Vols benefited from excellent timing to get Rick Barnes. Before that, this program bought from the mid-major aisle, and the coaches from Buffalo, Nevada, and Wofford were already gone.

It felt like we would come only so close in basketball, but no closer. A somewhat self-imposed ceiling on basketball at a football school.

Still, it didn’t surprise me that Barnes stayed. I’ve never met the man, but Tennessee just seems like such a better fit than UCLA for him right now.

What absolutely surprises and delights me: he didn’t just stay because his assistants got raises. Jimmy Hyams reports his salary will exceed $4.5 million a year.

Tennessee paid UCLA money. In basketball.

For the moment, Tennessee has the third-highest paid coach in college basketball. That’s not a happy-to-be-here Top 25 program. That’s a real-life commitment to the championship conversation.

I know several of the guys now ranked 4-10 on that list – Tom Izzo, Roy Williams, Bill Self, Jay Wright, and now Tony Bennett – have championship resumes. I’d imagine Rick Barnes just got a couple of those dudes paid. Good for them. To me, the primary takeaway isn’t whether Barnes is worth $3.25 million or $4.5 (or $5 at UCLA). It’s the good news that Tennessee was committed enough to basketball to pay the latter.

Barnes’ return is obviously a short-term win for Tennessee. It keeps Josiah James in the fold for sure; Jordan Bone and Grant Williams are testing the NBA waters and the Vols are a No. 6 seed in ESPN’s initial 2020 Bracketology. It returns the sense of stability we lost for a very long 24 hours.

But long-term? The Vols anted up at the big table. It’s outstanding news for the program’s future whenever Barnes decides to retire (hopefully with football risen from the ashes by then to create even more revenue). Last week there was as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball than at any point in my lifetime. This week there’s more.

Go Vols.

Something Something Bruce Pearl

Starting with the regular season finale against the Vols, Auburn hit 108 threes in eight consecutive games – a ridiculous 13.5 per – including 15 against Tennessee in the SEC Tournament Championship and 17 against North Carolina in the Sweet 16. Then they beat Kentucky while hitting only 7-of-23 (30.4%) and playing without Chuma Okeke. Auburn’s path to the Final Four included no upsets in the bracket: the Tigers beat a 12, 4, 1, and 2. Now they’ll get another No. 1 from Virginia. It’s an incredible accomplishment for an incredible coach.

Maybe you’re happy for Bruce; the alternative, of course, was Kentucky in the Final Four. Maybe you would’ve preferred the Cats to win; that’s a certainly a simpler outcome from our perspective, and would’ve put a team the Vols beat twice two steps from the national title. Maybe you just didn’t care to watch then, and won’t care to watch this weekend.

Any of those options are fine. Do what you want.

Just don’t pretend bad things always happen to Tennessee just because good things are happening for Bruce Pearl.

I’d imagine there’s a small demographic that was raised to expect the worst instead of the best. You don’t have to be too young to remember 1998 or 2001, just too young to remember 2007-08: a division title in football, back-to-back national championships for the Lady Vols, and a run to #1 with an SEC title in basketball. It’s the last time the athletic department was firing on all cylinders.

And when Fulmer was out the next year and we followed it with the Kiffin/Dooley exchange, Bruce Pearl took the 2010 Vols to the program’s first Elite Eight, a point away from the Final Four. In those big three sports, it’s the athletic department’s last blip on a national championship radar.

If you’re too young for 2007-08, you might even think of that 2010 run as a symptom of Tennessee’s malaise: Elite Eight one March, had to fire the coach the next. For the next seven years, even the high points were complicated. Cuonzo Martin’s run to the Sweet 16 in 2014. Individual great wins under Butch Jones that never stood the test of time by turning into great seasons, including an especially close 2015 and an only-up-then-only-down 2016. Elite Eights for Holly Warlick in 2013, 2015, and 2016, but no Final Four breakthrough.

For certain younger fans, I’m sure it seems like bad things do always happen to Tennessee. I can understand a negative instinctual response to Pearl cutting down the nets to get to the Final Four.

But watching Pearl make the Final Four – or win it all, which he might – isn’t the worst case scenario. The worst case scenario would’ve been all of that happening if Tennessee actually did finish 13th in the SEC two years ago.

It would’ve been bad enough last season, a basement SEC finish while Pearl won the league title. And even a reasonable follow-up from 13th place this season – which almost certainly wouldn’t have included the kind of wins on the recruiting trail the Vols are currently enjoying – would’ve been no match for watching Pearl do this.

Both would’ve driven us right back to the Bring Back Bruce fantasy at record speed, or at least a lament of its loss if we could bring ourselves to acknowledge that it was, in fact, fantasy. And that’s the thing about fantasy: reality is always better, because it’s, you know, real.

And here’s what’s really, actually, no-kidding happened at Tennessee the last two years:

  • 57 wins, a two-year program record
  • A No. 3 seed and No. 2 seed back-to-back, a two-year program record
  • Four weeks at #1, a program record
  • 4-2 against Kentucky
  • Our first consensus first-team All-American since 1983
  • 2018 SEC Championship
  • 2019 Sweet 16

It’s that last point where some will complain this team should’ve gone farther. I’m still in the “give Purdue credit” camp a week later; the bigger missed opportunity still feels like Loyola-Chicago. It’s understandable when you spend most of the year believing this is the best team in school history, there’s disappointment when they go out before becoming just the second team in school history to make the Elite Eight.

We talked about the myth of linear progression last week; you want progress for sure, but it’s never exclusively linear. It felt that way for Pearl at Tennessee, but I’d imagine it did not his first two years at Auburn.

The Vols are a program with only one Elite Eight to its name. But it will always be a dangerous game to make the NCAA Tournament a pass/fail rubric for the program’s success.

Here’s a list of the most Sweet 16 appearances since 2007:

  • Nine: Kansas, North Carolina
  • Eight: Duke, Kentucky, Michigan State
  • Seven: Wisconsin
  • Six: Arizona, Florida, Gonzaga, Louisville, Syracuse, Xavier
  • Five: Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Purdue, Tennessee, UCLA, West Virginia

When fans say, “We should make the Sweet 16 every year!”? Even the bluest of bloods miss out 30% of the time. And in these last 13 years, only six programs have made the Sweet 16 more often than not. It is, of course, not the ultimate goal for any program, and it’s not a hard-and-fast measure of success: Villanova has only four Sweet 16 appearances but two national championships since 2007. But for Tennessee, it’s still a good benchmark. And when the program is healthy – which still might be Rick Barnes’ greatest accomplishment – you build forward progress from there.

The NCAA Tournament will always be a unique, often cruel, and occasionally beautiful challenge. The entire goal of the regular season is to get your team playing its best basketball in March, and win enough games along the way to make the bracket as easy as possible. In this, Barnes has done a great job: a No. 3 seed and No. 2 seed the last two years is the best anyone from the SEC has done, besting Kentucky (No. 5 and No. 2) and Auburn (No. 4 and No. 5). And as we’ve seen, once you get there anything can happen, good or bad.

It’s understandable to have wanted more for this team. But given the history of Tennessee’s program and the last decade in this athletic department? I don’t understand treating these last two years like they were anything less than spectacular, no matter what Auburn does.

So cheer for Bruce. Or cheer against him. Or don’t watch. But acting like something bad always happens to Tennessee just because something good is happening to Pearl? Most of us are old enough to know better. And those who aren’t should be more appreciative of the last two seasons than any of us.

The last time things were this good for Tennessee basketball, Pearl was in trouble with the NCAA five months later. Maybe he will be again at Auburn, maybe he won’t. Maybe he’ll win it all this weekend, maybe Virginia will win by 30. But the most important truth for Tennessee has nothing to do with Pearl.

Because the most important truth is this: there is as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball right now than at any point in my lifetime.

What’s Next?

It’s a credit to what Rick Barnes and these players have built that, in the immediate aftermath of Purdue’s win, I could google 2020 NCAA Tournament sites with a straight face.

(The regions aren’t friendly – New York, LA, Indianapolis, and Houston – but the Final Four is in Atlanta.)

The long-term achievement of this team – the last two, really – was building the program itself. We all wanted more for Admiral Schofield and Kyle Alexander, in large part because of that very truth. But Schofield, Alexander, and the rest have given Tennessee a chance to be in the second weekend conversation going forward, and with that a chance to break new ground in the future.

One of the things that made Bruce Pearl’s run so impressive was a sense of linear progression: the stunning run to the tournament in year one, the Sweet 16 in year two, a No. 1 ranking and SEC title in year three, then the program’s first ever Elite Eight in year five. But it’s also true that his two highest-seeded teams lost, just like this one, earlier than they were bracketed to fall.

Every path through March is different. Last night’s loss feels so bad in part because of the potential this team had. But the bracket’s potential for upsets ended up being non-existent this year. The 2000 and 2018 losses were far worse in this department, because the path was so much easier on paper.

The bracket will always be unpredictable. What Tennessee has done is create an expectation that it will give itself a chance to advance.

The program still carries those memories from Pearl’s 2006-11 tenure. But we also can’t forget the danger of three coaches in three years when Barnes took over. And the present accomplishment isn’t a cycle-up year with a bunch of great players; that’s what Cuonzo’s 2014 run felt like as it was happening. It was Pearl, in the second half of his time here, who argued the Vols were a Top 25 program. It’s the same argument he’s making right now at Auburn.

Barnes has the credentials for such an idea too, past and present. If next year’s team makes the Elite Eight, there will be a sense of linear progression again. But in sports, thinking in those terms is usually more trouble than it’s worth. It won’t always be linear. But progression overall is the important part. And this Tennessee team and its players have earned that.

If Grant Williams and Jordan Bone return, the Vols will find themselves right back in the national conversation from preseason on. Those two would join Jordan Bowden and Lamonte Turner as seniors, with John Fulkerson a redshirt junior. The Vols will also get D.J. Burns as a redshirt freshman, who would’ve been the highest-rated recruit on this year’s team. And they’ll bring in Josiah James, the third-highest-rated recruit of the modern era period.

If Bone leaves early, Lamonte Turner’s importance will only increase, but they can also get some of those minutes from James in theory. Bone could end up being the better NBA prospect, but Williams would be harder to replace, and not just because he’s a two-time SEC Player of the Year. With or without him making a comeback for a chance to win it thrice and improve his draft stock, the Vols have to get more from their post players. The Vols got 12 minutes per game from Fulkerson this year, up from nine the year before, with an in-kind uptick in scoring and rebounding. But Derrick Walker’s minutes actually decreased, from 8.8 to 5.3. Without Alexander, Schofield, and potentially Williams? There’s a big void someone (or multiple someones) has to step into next season.

If both Williams and Bone depart early, next season will have a reload/retool feel that could depend a lot on how good James and Burns are right away. But just as the Vols have played themselves into the second weekend conversation, they’re recruiting at a level to continue the program’s progress. There are no certainties; the program looked ready to ascend a number of times in the last 20 years and then ran into trouble soon after. But Rick Barnes is a better fit than Jerry Green and Cuonzo Martin, and a more stable one than Bruce Pearl.

The 2019-20 Vols will continue their series with Memphis, begin home-and-homes with Wisconsin and Cincinnati, and we could get Tennessee-Purdue III (plus Florida State and VCU) in Destin for Thanksgiving. The SEC shows no signs of slowing down, as the long line of fired coaches will attest to.

But neither does Tennessee. March is cruel. But four years after what could have been a crippling situation, the Vols are building a program to survive and advance.

Purdue Wins a Classic 99-94 in Overtime

There is no easy way to lose one of these. If “easier” exists, maybe it’s what this one looked like for the first 30 minutes: some combination of not our day and the other team just being better. It happened to the other team to win 31 games in school history 11 years ago. Purdue certainly qualifies as a great team.

But Tennessee’s furious rally in the final ten minutes of regulation was seconds away from paying off as both an individual memory to live forever, and an open door to the program’s second Elite Eight appearance. Instead, it goes on the difficult Sweet 16 list. Up seven with 4:30 to play in 2000. Up 20 at halftime in 2007. A generous charge call against Jarnell Stokes in 2014.

I don’t think the refs should be the first or longest memory from this loss. Lamonte Turner got Carson Edwards’ body with enough contact to make that call one I can at least comprehend. We didn’t seem to get an angle to verify the ball went off Edwards’ foot seconds earlier. The refs did botch the final 1.7 seconds, starting the clock a hair early and not giving (not expecting?) a timeout immediately when it was called for, costing the Vols a few tenths of a second. But that part just leads to a hypothetical heave.

What actually happened was some of the very best theater I’ve ever seen in a basketball game on any level. Admiral Schofield and Ryan Cline trading daggers was impossible stuff, creating the kind of game you know you’re going to remember forever and you hope you’re on the right side of its ending. The drama deserved a better ending in regulation than the one it ultimately got in overtime.

That one went like this: Kyle Alexander fouled out, and the Vols were done.

Purdue took 31 threes in regulation. They took zero in overtime: Alexander fouled out with 3:01 to go, and Grady Eifert made two free throws to put Purdue up 87-84. The next two possessions: Carson Edwards with a layup, Matt Haarms with a dunk. Tennessee almost survived Purdue shooting 54% from the floor – the best any opponent shot outside Rupp Arena – and going 15-of-31 from the arc. They could not survive an offense that requires you to defend that without Alexander left in there at the rim.

And yes, Tennessee missed 14 free throws. Purdue missed 17, so it was a wash in the end result. The Vols certainly could’ve done better there, and have all year. Early and often, it was a visual reminder that for all we’ve seen this group of players do – including the most wins in a two-year period in school history – this was still their first Sweet 16. You could tell how happy they were to get here against Iowa, and they earned every bit of it after what happened against Loyola-Chicago the year before.

As Tennessee is still looking for its second Elite Eight and first Final Four, there’s a desire for breakthrough that’s part of the Vols’ basketball DNA. And for several of these heartbreaking tournament losses – 2000 North Carolina, 2007 Ohio State, last year with Loyola – the Vols had so much coming back, you could assume natural progression. And sometimes you get it: the 2001 Vols crashed and burned, but the 2008 Vols got to number one and this team went a round deeper in March. Depending on what Grant Williams and Jordan Bone decide to do, this team can still bring back quite a bit in 2020, plus the program’s first McDonald’s All-American coming in since Tobias Harris.

But this group of players already taught us so much about what you can do with expectations by going from 13th in the SEC two Novembers ago to all of this. I loved writing about this team. They’re fun to watch, and man, they made us proud.

Purdue made their fans proud tonight. Give them credit. This might be the best Sweet 16 field we’ve ever seen, and nothing was coming easy. This is the best Tennessee team of the KenPom era (2002-present). But right now, in that metric Purdue is the best team to knock the Vols out of the tournament other than the No. 1 seed Buckeyes in 2007.

Every season tells a story. We, of course, hoped this team would tell a longer story than we’d heard before. They earned that expectation. Tonight Purdue was better over the course of 45 minutes, leaving us with an ending that will always hurt when it doesn’t involve nets and a ladder. But what a great story this Tennessee team was. And is.

Go Vols.

Tennessee vs Purdue: Who Rules The Rim

This Tennessee team talks a lot about the 2017 off-season as the launching point for their success. It first showed up on the floor against Purdue.

November 22, 2017 really isn’t that long ago. But for Tennessee’s program, that day was about getting a neutral-site win over a ranked foe to significantly boost its RPI and its early-season tournament hopes. This time, beating Purdue leads to the Elite Eight, on the other side of a No. 2 vs No. 3 showdown.

Historic as it became, our memories of the last game with Purdue run thin because the Vols tried to hire Greg Schiano four days later. That’s a shame, because it ranks as Tennessee’s most exciting win of the decade via KenPom, besting this year’s win at Vanderbilt, the four-overtime win at Texas A&M in 2013, and our one and only Sweet 16 victory over Ohio State in 2010. That’s thanks to in-game fluctuations like these:

  • Purdue up 27-16 with five minutes left in the first half
  • And-one and two threes from Lamonte Turner over the next two minutes
  • Game tied at halftime
  • Vols up seven with 14 minutes to play
  • Purdue back in front with 11 minutes to play
  • Vols up six with six minutes to play
  • Purdue back in front with three minutes to play
  • Purdue up 63-60 with 18 seconds left; Lamonte Turner three forces OT
  • Grant Williams bucket, then 7-0 Purdue run, then a Kyle Alexander (!) three
  • Williams-to-Alexander slam, Vols up one with 45 seconds left
  • Purdue scores to retake the lead
  • Grant Williams backs down from the elbow, go-ahead score with 14 seconds left
  • Purdue miss, Admiral Schofield makes a diving save on the rebound to James Daniel with two seconds to go. Free throws, victory.

Purdue went on to the NCAA Tournament as a No. 2 seed, made it to the Sweet 16, and lost to Texas Tech by 13. The year before Purdue made the Sweet 16 as a No. 4 seed, but lost to Kansas by 32. Carsen Edwards has been around for all three trips. This round has been an issue. We saw what an adventure it was for the Vols to put their second round demons to rest. What will it take to keep Purdue’s alive?

The Two Big Differences

Purdue has nine losses to Tennessee’s five, but since a 6-5 start (including losses to Virginia Tech, Florida State, and Michigan) the Boilermakers are 19-4. In KenPom the Vols are third in offense and 33rd in defense; Purdue is fifth and 27th. The shooting numbers are real, spectacular, and almost identical. And if you think the Vols run a lot of their offense through Grant Williams, Carsen Edwards is involved in 34.6% of Purdue’s possessions, tenth nationally. There’s a lot to love about both teams.

But two things stand out in this match-up: Purdue’s offensive rebounding, and Tennessee’s shot blocking.

The Boilermakers get it back on 34.9% of their attempts. Most of those attempts come from Edwards, freeing up everyone else to go to the glass. And everyone else is freaking huge: the rest of the starters all go 6’6″ until you get to the end, where you’ll find 7’3″ Matt Haarms (the Vols saddled him with foul trouble last year). Then off the bench it’s 6’9″ freshman Trevion Williams, 6’9″ freshman Aaron Wheeler, and 6’8″ Evan Boudreaux.

Also, a note about starter Grady Eifert. He doesn’t get a lot of touches with Edwards and all that size. But when he touches it, it goes in: Eifert is ranked first nationally in KenPom’s offensive rating, 31-of-44 (70.5%) from two and 34-of-77 (44.2%) from three. He might be the player you’re most likely to lose in this offense. Don’t do that.

Generally, it’s going to Edwards, it’s going up, and Purdue is crashing if it doesn’t go in. So there should be opportunities in transition…but the Vols have to get the rebound first.

There’s some good news: the Boilermakers had 18 offensive rebounds against Michigan State, but lost (they had 13 in the rematch and won). They had 16 in a loss to Minnesota. It’s not a hard and fast rule. But it’s one the Vols have been relatively victimized by before: nine for Kansas, 10 for Auburn in Nashville, 11 for Kentucky, 12 for LSU. Purdue lives on the offensive glass. The Vols don’t always die there, but they’ve been vulnerable.

But Purdue is vulnerable at the rim as well: 11.3% of the Boilermakers’ shots get rejected. This is, in part, what can happen when a 6’1″ player takes 37.4% of your shots, the sixth-highest percentage in the nation. By comparison, Admiral Schofield takes 29.1% of Tennessee’s shots to lead the Vols. Beyond Edwards, this also highlights the one-on-one battles in the paint: Tennessee has to hold their own on the defensive glass, and must be aggressive in shot-blocking without falling into foul trouble. The Vols are 11th nationally in shot-blocking percentage. Without question, this is a massive game for Kyle Alexander.

The fouls bring up a consistent question down the stretch for the Vols: what will they get from Yves Pons and Derrick Walker? They’ve both played short shifts in the last few games, typically averaging about four total minutes. What happens in those four minutes? Neither is out there to score. But Pons had a turnover against Colgate and Iowa, Walker a turnover and two fouls in three minutes against the Hawkeyes. The Vols need their eighth and ninth players to do no harm.

This game is a coin flip any which way you want it. It has the potential to be as exciting as the one we saw last year. So much has changed since then. So much still can for the victor.

Tennessee 83 Iowa 77 (OT) – Almost Still Doesn’t Count

Last year Tennessee was on the wrong side of a good story and a bad bounce, sending Loyola-Chicago to the Sweet 16 and the Vols to think about next year. For the first 20 minutes today, the Vols were the good story: total annihilation of Iowa, a can-you-top-this response to Purdue’s triumph over Villanova.

That match-up is still on, but it had to wait a lot longer than we would’ve liked.

Again, there are no bad wins in this tournament. So just the same as we didn’t have to belabor how Colgate rallied to take a two-point lead midway through the second half in round one, we don’t have to burden ourselves with the excruciating details of Iowa’s second half rally today. The high points, anyway, are Lamonte Turner splashing a three after getting the wrong end of a terrible call, putting Tennessee back up three after Iowa tied the game on the ensuing free throws.

Let’s back up, though, to talk about one detail. Grant Williams hit a shot with 10:02 to play that put the Vols up 13. Iowa was game, but the Vols still had plenty of cushion. In the last ten minutes, the Vols made two shots: Lamonte Turner’s twisting layup to put the Vols up five with seven minutes to go, and the aforementioned clutch three with two minutes to play.

And then in overtime – with Admiral Schofield apparently benching himself – the Vols scored on their first four possessions. None bigger than this one:

https://twitter.com/marchmadness/status/1109884731288514560

49 points in the first half. 22 points in the second half. 12 points in overtime. And the Vols advance.

Here’s a picture to keep in mind:

Fans like us sit between the people in this photo. Today makes six trips to the Sweet 16 since 2000 for Tennessee, and five in the last 13 years. It’s happened enough to make it a reasonable expectation for a Tennessee team as good as this one. And this one just won its 31st game, tying 2008 for the school record, and remains atop the program leaderboard in KenPom. There are still plenty of reasons to believe this team can be the best in school history; it’s really just one more win away from ending that argument.

In the center is Rick Barnes, who’s now made seven Sweet 16’s: one at Clemson, five at Texas, and today. Barnes also won the next game three times at Texas, and made the Final Four in 2003. He hasn’t necessarily been to this point much more than us, but he’s been beyond it far more often. I don’t know how he feels about having water dumped all over him today only because he knows how he feels about having water dumped all over him when you’re going to the Final Four.

But I can tell how the guys holding the water feel about it.

We’ll nitpick and break down and figure out how to beat Purdue. But for now – at least for today – this picture helps me remember the guys on this team weren’t just heartbroken a season ago, they were 16-16 two years ago and 15-19 the year before that.

We’ve been here, Rick’s been here and more. But for this group – best in school history or not – this is history. It was almost the wrong kind of history with the biggest blown lead in the tournament. But, just as the Vols found out last year in this thing, almost doesn’t count. So instead, this team joyously plays on.

The next part looks different than last year too.

Part of 2018’s heartbreak was how the bracket came apart: had the Vols survived Loyola, they would’ve joined No. 5 Kentucky, No. 9 Kansas State, and No. 7 Nevada in Atlanta for a trip to the Final Four. This time, No. 3 Purdue is the next man up, with No. 1 Virginia and No. 9 Oklahoma set to meet tonight to determine who gets to face No. 13 UC Irvine (EDIT: or No. 12 Oregon, who apparently I’m discounting because we all still want to believe in Cinderella). So sure, the Sooners could win tonight and make an easier on-paper path in the Elite Eight. But Purdue, as demonstrated against Villanova last night, is a monster: the Vols are favored by a point in the opening line, the Boliermakers by a point in KenPom.

We’ll get to that, in great and joyous detail. And looking ahead, it’s not just that:

No. 1 North Carolina is up eight on Washington at halftime as I type. Duke, Virginia, Texas Tech, and Houston are all left on today’s slate among top three seeds. But man oh man, the potential in this Sweet 16. Maybe you didn’t like the first weekend because it lacked chaos (in the destination, because it was certainly present in the journey). But if you like great college basketball, look at what’s already out there next weekend:

  • No. 2 Tennessee vs No. 3 Purdue
  • No. 2 Michigan State vs No. 3 LSU
  • No. 1 North Carolina (+8 at half) vs No. 5 Auburn
  • No. 1 Gonzaga vs No. 4 Florida State
  • No. 2 Michigan vs No. 3 Texas Tech or No. 6 Buffalo

And then, we could add a Duke/Virginia Tech rematch, another 2/3 battle with Kentucky and Houston, and No. 1 Virginia still alive too. This has the potential to be an all-time Sweet 16.

This can still be an all-time Tennessee team too. They’re going to have to be better against Purdue. But for now, for today…let’s celebrate. This team, two seasons removed from being 13th in the SEC media poll and 53 weeks removed from second round heartbreak, is going to the Sweet 16.

Keep getting better.

Go Vols.

Tennessee vs Iowa Preview

When last we met, ’twas overtime in Dayton, and we started asking ourselves, “Can Josh Richardson – Josh Richardson – be the alpha for this team?” Five years and two coaches later, Josh Richardson is the leading scorer for the Miami Heat, and Tennessee is aiming to be the the alpha in college basketball.

The Vols looked like it – as much as a No. 2 is supposed to against a No. 15 – for significant stretches of the first half against Colgate. In the second half, Jordan Burns decided he wanted a piece of that action for himself, and took it until Admiral Schofield wrestled it away in the final minutes.

Winning is the only thing that matters now, so no need to belabor yesterday’s performance specifically. A tip of the cap to Jordan Burns. But how does yesterday’s performance play into what this Tennessee team will do with this tournament, with a not-dissimilar opponent from Iowa City headed our way next?

The Three & Tennessee

The Vols were 9-of-26 (34.6%) from the arc against Colgate; too many, some will say. And it’s true, the Vols are 22-1 when they take less than 22 threes, 8-4 when they take 22+. But for every bad – 8-of-22 at LSU, 7-of-25 at Kentucky, 7-of-27 vs Kansas, 9-of-28 at Auburn? There’s also this: 10-of-21 vs Kentucky in Nashville, 8-of-22 vs Kentucky in Knoxville, 6-of-23 vs Mississippi State in Knoxville, 9-of-23 at Florida, and 12-of-29 vs Gonzaga.

And Tennessee’s second-highest percentage from the arc on the year is…Auburn in the SEC Tournament, where if you said the Vols would hit 8-of-15 (53.3%) coming in, we’d have praised their patience and assumed we cut down the nets.

The three isn’t Tennessee’s outright strength. But it’s not always Tennessee’s outright enemy. All those great memories we’ve made this year? At the end of games, they look like this:

  • Grant Williams makes a play, or
  • Somebody hits a three

And often the one leads to the other, which is really where Tennessee’s best basketball lives: a touch for Grant, then a good shot or good ball movement. At times Colgate crashed four guys on Williams; he has to pass, and those guys have to take that open shot. Admiral Schofield hits 41.6% on the year, Jordan Bowden 36.1%. Those guys need to shoot that shot.

Just maybe not against Iowa.

The Three & Iowa

The Hawkeyes allow just 32.3% from the arc, 59th nationally.

The Hawkeyes allow 53.6% inside the arc, 306th nationally.

They’re not just some group getting hammered inside: Iowa is 63rd in opponent free throw rate. But when you put their two-point defensive numbers together with the assist rate they allow (58.3%, 316th nationally), this is a team you slice up with good ball movement.

Tennessee’s assist numbers have gone down as the competition has gone up in the last month. The Vols have nine games on the year with less than 15 assists; seven of them have come in the last 11 games overall, including only 13 assists vs Colgate. That’s a good number to think about for Iowa: when opponents have more than 15 assists, Iowa is 7-9. When it’s 18+, Iowa is 2-7. And when opponents have 15 or fewer assists, Iowa is 16-2.

There’s a pacing issue here as well. In the Big Ten, Iowa is second overall in tempo and first in shortest offensive possession length. But they’ll only be the seventh-fastest team Tennessee has faced this year.

The Vols should be able to get the shots they want against this defense. Will the same be true on the other end of the floor?

The Defense Must Improve to Reach a Championship Level

There are no guarantees. In the first round, some elite offenses met their match: farewell to Iowa State (#10 offense KenPom), 6-of-22 from the arc against Ohio State; our friends from Starkville (#15 offense) watched Liberty shoot 12-of-25 (48%) from the arc. And on the other end of the spectrum, Top 10 defenses from Wisconsin (#3), Kansas State (#6), and VCU (#7) all went out in the first round.

The Hawkeyes are 14th in offensive efficiency, putting them right next to Mississippi State; Villanova, who could be next, is 16th. Tennessee has seen better from Gonzaga, Auburn, Kentucky, and LSU, but the Hawkeyes are still potent.

The biggest talking point in this match-up should still be what Tennessee’s offense can do inside the arc against Iowa’s defense. But if the Hawkeyes get hot from the arc, like Colgate, the narrative can change in a hurry. Iowa shoots 36.5% from the arc, 66th nationally. Their real strength has been getting to the free throw line: 16th nationally in free throw rate, led by 6’9″ Tyler Cook. If you watched them play Cincinnati, you know size is definitely a factor: Cook and 6’11” Luka Garza will go hard to the offensive glass, and much of Iowa’s offense runs through them. And the rest of these guys will put it up from three, again, much like Colgate:

  • Jordan Bohannon 76-of-199, 38.2%
  • Joe Wieskamp 58-of-134, 43.3%
  • Nicholas Baer 45-of-116, 38.8%
  • Isaiah Moss 45-of-109, 41.3%

It may surprise you to know Tennessee has won each of its ten worst performances defending against the three. Colgate’s 51.7% was second on the year, behind South Carolina hitting 14-of-23 (60.9%) in Knoxville. Some of Tennessee’s best wins are on that list, including Kentucky in Nashville, Louisville, at Ole Miss, and Gonzaga. The Vols have been good enough to not just survive against hot-shooting teams, but beat some of the best teams on their schedule and in the nation.

But in March, it only takes one of these going wrong to end you. Colgate flirted with it yesterday, Iowa may again tomorrow. And Tennessee, a seven-to-nine point favorite depending on who you ask, may again just overcome it on the offensive end, or make the plays, again, down the stretch.

Tennessee’s offense is that good. If the Vols are looking to cut down nets, they’ll have to be better on the defensive end. Iowa would be a good place to start.

The Vols and Hawkeyes go right away on Sunday: 12:10 PM ET, CBS. Louisville awaits.

Go Vols.

Tennessee’s Path Through the South Region

Tennessee’s NCAA Tournament history goes something like this: after the field was expanded to 64 teams in 1985, the Vols didn’t make the Sweet 16 until 2000. With the turn of the century came better basketball: Tennessee played its way to the second weekend in 2000, 2007, 2008, 2010, and 2014. The Vols can make it six times in the last 20 years with wins on Friday and Sunday; that math sends every senior to the Sweet 16 at least once on average. Three other times since 1985, the Vols lost in the second round despite receiving a seed projected to make it to the second weekend: 1999 (No. 4), 2006 (No. 2), and last season (No. 3).

Of course, only the 2010 squad made it through to the Elite Eight, and almost made it to the Final Four. Making it to a regional final thus becomes a clear indicator of an all-time season at Tennessee, no matter what preceded it. In this year’s case, better basketball but no hardware came before a chance to play through the geographically-friendly confines of the South region as its No. 2 seed.

In Knoxville, winning two games puts you on a great list. Winning three puts you atop it. And we’ll hang your own banner for winning four; two of them if you win six.

It all starts today, though thankfully Tennessee starts tomorrow, which gives us 16 games before we become emotionally compromised, no matter what happens to your bracket. Tennessee’s past history and present seed point to the Elite Eight as a reasonable goal; the team atop the region being number one in KenPom by a healthy margin also presents one scenario where you just get beat by a better team at region’s end.

Anything can happen between now and then. And make no mistake: this Tennessee team is definitely good enough to envision another scenario where it wins the whole Fulmerized thing.

For now, let’s take a look at Tennessee’s path to the Elite Eight in comparison to its predecessors who were seeded high enough to get there. Last year stands out because of the chaos that happened in Tennessee’s region: KenPom No. 1 Virginia down to a No. 16 seed in round one, KenPom No. 4 Cincinnati down to Nevada in round two. The Vols at No. 3 fell to Sister Jean in round two. But that path wasn’t looking easy at all when the tournament began. It’s always going to be harder to make the case for an Elite Eight from a No. 3 seed. Let’s look instead at Tennessee’s other two No. 2 seeds.

Round One

  • 2006 Greensboro: Winthrop (KenPom 80)
  • 2008 Birmingham: American (KenPom 149)
  • 2019 Columbus: Colgate (KenPom 127)

All geographically friendly, but not all opponents created equal. Bruce Pearl’s first team was 19-3 (10-1), lost at Alabama, then won at Florida to secure the SEC East and get to 20-4 (11-2). From there, yuck: back-to-back home losses to Arkansas and Kentucky, a road win at Vanderbilt, then one-and-done in the SEC Tournament to South Carolina. The committee still awarded a No. 2 seed, but Winthrop almost pulled the upset. But…

The 2008 Vols handled American 72-57 behind four threes from JaJuan Smith. This year, Colgate checks in at 127th in KenPom, the highest of the No. 15 seeds (Montana 137, Abilene Christian 146, Bradley 161) but nothing as scary as Winthrop on paper. KenPom likes the Vols by 15 points.

Round Two

  • 2006: No. 7 Wichita State (KenPom 36 pre-tournament)
  • 2008: No. 7 Butler (KenPom 26 pre-tournament)
  • 2019: No. 7 Cincinnati (KenPom 32) or No. 10 Iowa (KenPom 36)

Before Wichita was Wichita, they were a No. 7 seed that hadn’t won an NCAA Tournament game since 1981. They won two by beating the Vols in the second round in 2006, turning back a five-point Tennessee lead with under six minutes to play. Mark Turgeon left for the Texas A&M job the following year, leading to Gregg Marshall’s arrival. On that day in Greensboro, the Shockers hit 50% from the floor and 9-of-16 60% from the arc; that’ll get you beat.

The real seeding travesty was 2008. Butler was 29-3 on Selection Sunday and ranked 11th in the AP poll, but was given a No. 7 seed opposite the Vols. This was Brad Stevens’ first year as head coach, and they almost pulled it off: Tennessee won 76-71 in overtime, closing the game on a 10-3 run.

This year Cincinnati presents a challenge in geography. But if you remove that from the equation and I asked who you wanted to play in the second round among No. 7 seeds Louisville (17th KenPom), Wofford (21st), Nevada (25th), and Cincinnati (32nd)? You’d probably agree with Mr. Pomeroy. Iowa is the second-highest No. 10 seed in KenPom, but behind the Gators, who couldn’t be matched up with Tennessee in the second round.

The geography is good for Tennessee in general, bad for Cincinnati specifically, but the potential second round opponents are about what you’d expect from a 7/10 match-up. And the Vols avoided getting into it with an under-seeded mid-major for the second year in a row.

Potential Sweet 16 Opponents

  • 2006 Washington DC: No. 3 North Carolina (KenPom 8), No. 11 George Mason (KenPom 25)
  • 2008 Charlotte: No. 3 Louisville (KenPom 11)
  • 2019 Louisville: No. 3 Purdue (KenPom 10)

Speaking of under-seeded mid-majors, George Mason would’ve been the foe had the Vols closed against Wichita in 2006. They ultimately went through No. 1 seed UConn to get to the Final Four.

Tennessee’s seeding in 2008 is, again, well-discussed at this point. The Cardinals were a bad match-up, though in KenPom all the No. 3 seeds were bunched together that year. There was no easy road through Charlotte anyway: No. 1 North Carolina was waiting in the Elite Eight. 2008 remains the only year all four No. 1 seeds advanced to the Final Four.

This year, in KenPom, Purdue and Texas Tech are 9th and 10th, the class of the No. 3 seeds. Houston, a big winner in NET, is 15th; LSU is 18th, but probably not an option for the Vols with both coming from the SEC.

Further down the list, Villanova is 26th in KenPom, but they get no prize right away: St. Mary’s is 30th, easily the highest-rated No. 11 seed (Ohio State is second at 44th).

A date with Purdue in Louisville would be lots of fun; the Boilermakers are a shade closer to the arena than the Volunteers. And, again, I think it’s what you have to expect in a 2/3 Sweet 16 match-up, if we get it: both teams are really good. You can nitpick a couple of things as always, but I think this bracket is reasonable. We can worry about Virginia if/when we both get there, but Tennessee’s road to the program’s second ever Elite Eight is one this team is capable of handling.

Enjoy the ride.