Gameday on Rocky Top

The last sentence of the last thing I wrote about Tennessee on Friday was, “There is as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball right now than at any point in my lifetime.”

This was immediately tested, of course. The point of that piece on Friday was to not pretend bad things always happen to Tennessee just because good things were happening to Bruce Pearl. But we are definitely no stranger to ye olde time of testing.

On some level it felt like an accomplishment that a coach would even consider staying at Tennessee when the alternative is UCLA. Because that coach is Rick Barnes at age 64, I think most of us also believed staying at Tennessee was the better fit all along.

But as the hours stretched on – and it’s remarkable how this whole thing happened in right at 24 hours but felt like so much more – the narrative of Tennessee’s commitment to basketball moved to the forefront. I wasn’t thinking about matching UCLA dollar for dollar; those dollars still go further in Knoxville, and are now unnecessary at an impressive assortment of local restaurants. It began to feel more about what a basketball program could be worth at a football school. Especially a good basketball program at what used to be a great football school.

If Barnes simply said yes to an enormous salary a program like UCLA could offer but Tennessee could not, so be it, I told myself. But with the conversation seemingly focused on Tennessee’s overall commitment to basketball, including assistant salaries and the program’s place in the athletic department, it became a telling moment for Phillip Fulmer and the narrative of Tennessee basketball.

My teams have had a really good run over the course of my life. The Braves won the World Series when I was 14, the Vols a national championship at 17. I grew up in the immediate aftermath of the Celtics’ three titles in the 80’s, then watched them win another when I was 26. And for the most part, really until the last decade of Tennessee football, my teams were really well run and competitive on the highest levels. Only three championships, but plenty of seasons in the conversation.

Because of that, there’s a part of me that pulls for Tennessee basketball the hardest. Basketball is my favorite sport. But college basketball is also the one where my favorite team had the most room to grow, as my fandom came of age during the Wade Houston era. There were individual runs with the 2000-01 teams and Cuonzo Martin’s last season. But the long-term trust my other favorite teams earned has really only been available for Tennessee basketball twice in my 37 years. One was at the tail end of Bruce Pearl’s tenure in 2010, the post-Chris Lofton run to the Elite Eight solidifying his ability to make Tennessee, as he said then and says now about Auburn, a Top 25 program instead of a Top 25 team.

But then Pearl was gone by his own hand a year later. Anyone who’s spent any time reading me through the years knows I love Cuonzo Martin. But that hire at the time – three years at Missouri State, zero NCAA Tournament appearances – wasn’t a Top 25 program hire.

Then Rick Barnes re-established that long-term trust over the last two years. Tennessee was back in the Top 25 program conversation, with NCAA Tournament seeds built for the second weekend. McDonald’s All-Americans were signing here again. And Barnes carried none of the baggage of scandal and investigation. After a decade of instability, things suddenly seemed so safe: Fulmer in the big job, Jim Chaney running the offense, and Barnes the safest bet of all.

And then all of a sudden it seemed like he might leave, and it felt like the whole program was in jeopardy again. Because we’re not just a football school, we’re a football school where the football team is 67-70 in the last 11 years. Perhaps a football school could only be committed to basketball when football is doing well. Or even if that wasn’t the case and Barnes just took the UCLA money, would we/could we pay someone new to stay on the same level? And what names are on that list when you’re hiring a week after everyone else? The Vols benefited from excellent timing to get Rick Barnes. Before that, this program bought from the mid-major aisle, and the coaches from Buffalo, Nevada, and Wofford were already gone.

It felt like we would come only so close in basketball, but no closer. A somewhat self-imposed ceiling on basketball at a football school.

Still, it didn’t surprise me that Barnes stayed. I’ve never met the man, but Tennessee just seems like such a better fit than UCLA for him right now.

What absolutely surprises and delights me: he didn’t just stay because his assistants got raises. Jimmy Hyams reports his salary will exceed $4.5 million a year.

Tennessee paid UCLA money. In basketball.

For the moment, Tennessee has the third-highest paid coach in college basketball. That’s not a happy-to-be-here Top 25 program. That’s a real-life commitment to the championship conversation.

I know several of the guys now ranked 4-10 on that list – Tom Izzo, Roy Williams, Bill Self, Jay Wright, and now Tony Bennett – have championship resumes. I’d imagine Rick Barnes just got a couple of those dudes paid. Good for them. To me, the primary takeaway isn’t whether Barnes is worth $3.25 million or $4.5 (or $5 at UCLA). It’s the good news that Tennessee was committed enough to basketball to pay the latter.

Barnes’ return is obviously a short-term win for Tennessee. It keeps Josiah James in the fold for sure; Jordan Bone and Grant Williams are testing the NBA waters and the Vols are a No. 6 seed in ESPN’s initial 2020 Bracketology. It returns the sense of stability we lost for a very long 24 hours.

But long-term? The Vols anted up at the big table. It’s outstanding news for the program’s future whenever Barnes decides to retire (hopefully with football risen from the ashes by then to create even more revenue). Last week there was as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball than at any point in my lifetime. This week there’s more.

Go Vols.

Starting with the regular season finale against the Vols, Auburn hit 108 threes in eight consecutive games – a ridiculous 13.5 per – including 15 against Tennessee in the SEC Tournament Championship and 17 against North Carolina in the Sweet 16. Then they beat Kentucky while hitting only 7-of-23 (30.4%) and playing without Chuma Okeke. Auburn’s path to the Final Four included no upsets in the bracket: the Tigers beat a 12, 4, 1, and 2. Now they’ll get another No. 1 from Virginia. It’s an incredible accomplishment for an incredible coach.

Maybe you’re happy for Bruce; the alternative, of course, was Kentucky in the Final Four. Maybe you would’ve preferred the Cats to win; that’s a certainly a simpler outcome from our perspective, and would’ve put a team the Vols beat twice two steps from the national title. Maybe you just didn’t care to watch then, and won’t care to watch this weekend.

Any of those options are fine. Do what you want.

Just don’t pretend bad things always happen to Tennessee just because good things are happening for Bruce Pearl.

I’d imagine there’s a small demographic that was raised to expect the worst instead of the best. You don’t have to be too young to remember 1998 or 2001, just too young to remember 2007-08: a division title in football, back-to-back national championships for the Lady Vols, and a run to #1 with an SEC title in basketball. It’s the last time the athletic department was firing on all cylinders.

And when Fulmer was out the next year and we followed it with the Kiffin/Dooley exchange, Bruce Pearl took the 2010 Vols to the program’s first Elite Eight, a point away from the Final Four. In those big three sports, it’s the athletic department’s last blip on a national championship radar.

If you’re too young for 2007-08, you might even think of that 2010 run as a symptom of Tennessee’s malaise: Elite Eight one March, had to fire the coach the next. For the next seven years, even the high points were complicated. Cuonzo Martin’s run to the Sweet 16 in 2014. Individual great wins under Butch Jones that never stood the test of time by turning into great seasons, including an especially close 2015 and an only-up-then-only-down 2016. Elite Eights for Holly Warlick in 2013, 2015, and 2016, but no Final Four breakthrough.

For certain younger fans, I’m sure it seems like bad things do always happen to Tennessee. I can understand a negative instinctual response to Pearl cutting down the nets to get to the Final Four.

But watching Pearl make the Final Four – or win it all, which he might – isn’t the worst case scenario. The worst case scenario would’ve been all of that happening if Tennessee actually did finish 13th in the SEC two years ago.

It would’ve been bad enough last season, a basement SEC finish while Pearl won the league title. And even a reasonable follow-up from 13th place this season – which almost certainly wouldn’t have included the kind of wins on the recruiting trail the Vols are currently enjoying – would’ve been no match for watching Pearl do this.

Both would’ve driven us right back to the Bring Back Bruce fantasy at record speed, or at least a lament of its loss if we could bring ourselves to acknowledge that it was, in fact, fantasy. And that’s the thing about fantasy: reality is always better, because it’s, you know, real.

And here’s what’s really, actually, no-kidding happened at Tennessee the last two years:

• 57 wins, a two-year program record
• A No. 3 seed and No. 2 seed back-to-back, a two-year program record
• Four weeks at #1, a program record
• 4-2 against Kentucky
• Our first consensus first-team All-American since 1983
• 2018 SEC Championship
• 2019 Sweet 16

It’s that last point where some will complain this team should’ve gone farther. I’m still in the “give Purdue credit” camp a week later; the bigger missed opportunity still feels like Loyola-Chicago. It’s understandable when you spend most of the year believing this is the best team in school history, there’s disappointment when they go out before becoming just the second team in school history to make the Elite Eight.

We talked about the myth of linear progression last week; you want progress for sure, but it’s never exclusively linear. It felt that way for Pearl at Tennessee, but I’d imagine it did not his first two years at Auburn.

The Vols are a program with only one Elite Eight to its name. But it will always be a dangerous game to make the NCAA Tournament a pass/fail rubric for the program’s success.

Here’s a list of the most Sweet 16 appearances since 2007:

• Nine: Kansas, North Carolina
• Eight: Duke, Kentucky, Michigan State
• Seven: Wisconsin
• Six: Arizona, Florida, Gonzaga, Louisville, Syracuse, Xavier
• Five: Michigan, Ohio State, Oregon, Purdue, Tennessee, UCLA, West Virginia

When fans say, “We should make the Sweet 16 every year!”? Even the bluest of bloods miss out 30% of the time. And in these last 13 years, only six programs have made the Sweet 16 more often than not. It is, of course, not the ultimate goal for any program, and it’s not a hard-and-fast measure of success: Villanova has only four Sweet 16 appearances but two national championships since 2007. But for Tennessee, it’s still a good benchmark. And when the program is healthy – which still might be Rick Barnes’ greatest accomplishment – you build forward progress from there.

The NCAA Tournament will always be a unique, often cruel, and occasionally beautiful challenge. The entire goal of the regular season is to get your team playing its best basketball in March, and win enough games along the way to make the bracket as easy as possible. In this, Barnes has done a great job: a No. 3 seed and No. 2 seed the last two years is the best anyone from the SEC has done, besting Kentucky (No. 5 and No. 2) and Auburn (No. 4 and No. 5). And as we’ve seen, once you get there anything can happen, good or bad.

It’s understandable to have wanted more for this team. But given the history of Tennessee’s program and the last decade in this athletic department? I don’t understand treating these last two years like they were anything less than spectacular, no matter what Auburn does.

So cheer for Bruce. Or cheer against him. Or don’t watch. But acting like something bad always happens to Tennessee just because something good is happening to Pearl? Most of us are old enough to know better. And those who aren’t should be more appreciative of the last two seasons than any of us.

The last time things were this good for Tennessee basketball, Pearl was in trouble with the NCAA five months later. Maybe he will be again at Auburn, maybe he won’t. Maybe he’ll win it all this weekend, maybe Virginia will win by 30. But the most important truth for Tennessee has nothing to do with Pearl.

Because the most important truth is this: there is as much reason to believe in Tennessee basketball right now than at any point in my lifetime.

It’s a credit to what Rick Barnes and these players have built that, in the immediate aftermath of Purdue’s win, I could google 2020 NCAA Tournament sites with a straight face.

(The regions aren’t friendly – New York, LA, Indianapolis, and Houston – but the Final Four is in Atlanta.)

The long-term achievement of this team – the last two, really – was building the program itself. We all wanted more for Admiral Schofield and Kyle Alexander, in large part because of that very truth. But Schofield, Alexander, and the rest have given Tennessee a chance to be in the second weekend conversation going forward, and with that a chance to break new ground in the future.

One of the things that made Bruce Pearl’s run so impressive was a sense of linear progression: the stunning run to the tournament in year one, the Sweet 16 in year two, a No. 1 ranking and SEC title in year three, then the program’s first ever Elite Eight in year five. But it’s also true that his two highest-seeded teams lost, just like this one, earlier than they were bracketed to fall.

Every path through March is different. Last night’s loss feels so bad in part because of the potential this team had. But the bracket’s potential for upsets ended up being non-existent this year. The 2000 and 2018 losses were far worse in this department, because the path was so much easier on paper.

The bracket will always be unpredictable. What Tennessee has done is create an expectation that it will give itself a chance to advance.

The program still carries those memories from Pearl’s 2006-11 tenure. But we also can’t forget the danger of three coaches in three years when Barnes took over. And the present accomplishment isn’t a cycle-up year with a bunch of great players; that’s what Cuonzo’s 2014 run felt like as it was happening. It was Pearl, in the second half of his time here, who argued the Vols were a Top 25 program. It’s the same argument he’s making right now at Auburn.

Barnes has the credentials for such an idea too, past and present. If next year’s team makes the Elite Eight, there will be a sense of linear progression again. But in sports, thinking in those terms is usually more trouble than it’s worth. It won’t always be linear. But progression overall is the important part. And this Tennessee team and its players have earned that.

If Grant Williams and Jordan Bone return, the Vols will find themselves right back in the national conversation from preseason on. Those two would join Jordan Bowden and Lamonte Turner as seniors, with John Fulkerson a redshirt junior. The Vols will also get D.J. Burns as a redshirt freshman, who would’ve been the highest-rated recruit on this year’s team. And they’ll bring in Josiah James, the third-highest-rated recruit of the modern era period.

If Bone leaves early, Lamonte Turner’s importance will only increase, but they can also get some of those minutes from James in theory. Bone could end up being the better NBA prospect, but Williams would be harder to replace, and not just because he’s a two-time SEC Player of the Year. With or without him making a comeback for a chance to win it thrice and improve his draft stock, the Vols have to get more from their post players. The Vols got 12 minutes per game from Fulkerson this year, up from nine the year before, with an in-kind uptick in scoring and rebounding. But Derrick Walker’s minutes actually decreased, from 8.8 to 5.3. Without Alexander, Schofield, and potentially Williams? There’s a big void someone (or multiple someones) has to step into next season.

If both Williams and Bone depart early, next season will have a reload/retool feel that could depend a lot on how good James and Burns are right away. But just as the Vols have played themselves into the second weekend conversation, they’re recruiting at a level to continue the program’s progress. There are no certainties; the program looked ready to ascend a number of times in the last 20 years and then ran into trouble soon after. But Rick Barnes is a better fit than Jerry Green and Cuonzo Martin, and a more stable one than Bruce Pearl.

The 2019-20 Vols will continue their series with Memphis, begin home-and-homes with Wisconsin and Cincinnati, and we could get Tennessee-Purdue III (plus Florida State and VCU) in Destin for Thanksgiving. The SEC shows no signs of slowing down, as the long line of fired coaches will attest to.

But neither does Tennessee. March is cruel. But four years after what could have been a crippling situation, the Vols are building a program to survive and advance.

There is no easy way to lose one of these. If “easier” exists, maybe it’s what this one looked like for the first 30 minutes: some combination of not our day and the other team just being better. It happened to the other team to win 31 games in school history 11 years ago. Purdue certainly qualifies as a great team.

But Tennessee’s furious rally in the final ten minutes of regulation was seconds away from paying off as both an individual memory to live forever, and an open door to the program’s second Elite Eight appearance. Instead, it goes on the difficult Sweet 16 list. Up seven with 4:30 to play in 2000. Up 20 at halftime in 2007. A generous charge call against Jarnell Stokes in 2014.

I don’t think the refs should be the first or longest memory from this loss. Lamonte Turner got Carson Edwards’ body with enough contact to make that call one I can at least comprehend. We didn’t seem to get an angle to verify the ball went off Edwards’ foot seconds earlier. The refs did botch the final 1.7 seconds, starting the clock a hair early and not giving (not expecting?) a timeout immediately when it was called for, costing the Vols a few tenths of a second. But that part just leads to a hypothetical heave.

What actually happened was some of the very best theater I’ve ever seen in a basketball game on any level. Admiral Schofield and Ryan Cline trading daggers was impossible stuff, creating the kind of game you know you’re going to remember forever and you hope you’re on the right side of its ending. The drama deserved a better ending in regulation than the one it ultimately got in overtime.

That one went like this: Kyle Alexander fouled out, and the Vols were done.

Purdue took 31 threes in regulation. They took zero in overtime: Alexander fouled out with 3:01 to go, and Grady Eifert made two free throws to put Purdue up 87-84. The next two possessions: Carson Edwards with a layup, Matt Haarms with a dunk. Tennessee almost survived Purdue shooting 54% from the floor – the best any opponent shot outside Rupp Arena – and going 15-of-31 from the arc. They could not survive an offense that requires you to defend that without Alexander left in there at the rim.

And yes, Tennessee missed 14 free throws. Purdue missed 17, so it was a wash in the end result. The Vols certainly could’ve done better there, and have all year. Early and often, it was a visual reminder that for all we’ve seen this group of players do – including the most wins in a two-year period in school history – this was still their first Sweet 16. You could tell how happy they were to get here against Iowa, and they earned every bit of it after what happened against Loyola-Chicago the year before.

As Tennessee is still looking for its second Elite Eight and first Final Four, there’s a desire for breakthrough that’s part of the Vols’ basketball DNA. And for several of these heartbreaking tournament losses – 2000 North Carolina, 2007 Ohio State, last year with Loyola – the Vols had so much coming back, you could assume natural progression. And sometimes you get it: the 2001 Vols crashed and burned, but the 2008 Vols got to number one and this team went a round deeper in March. Depending on what Grant Williams and Jordan Bone decide to do, this team can still bring back quite a bit in 2020, plus the program’s first McDonald’s All-American coming in since Tobias Harris.

But this group of players already taught us so much about what you can do with expectations by going from 13th in the SEC two Novembers ago to all of this. I loved writing about this team. They’re fun to watch, and man, they made us proud.

Purdue made their fans proud tonight. Give them credit. This might be the best Sweet 16 field we’ve ever seen, and nothing was coming easy. This is the best Tennessee team of the KenPom era (2002-present). But right now, in that metric Purdue is the best team to knock the Vols out of the tournament other than the No. 1 seed Buckeyes in 2007.

Every season tells a story. We, of course, hoped this team would tell a longer story than we’d heard before. They earned that expectation. Tonight Purdue was better over the course of 45 minutes, leaving us with an ending that will always hurt when it doesn’t involve nets and a ladder. But what a great story this Tennessee team was. And is.

Go Vols.

This Tennessee team talks a lot about the 2017 off-season as the launching point for their success. It first showed up on the floor against Purdue.

November 22, 2017 really isn’t that long ago. But for Tennessee’s program, that day was about getting a neutral-site win over a ranked foe to significantly boost its RPI and its early-season tournament hopes. This time, beating Purdue leads to the Elite Eight, on the other side of a No. 2 vs No. 3 showdown.

Historic as it became, our memories of the last game with Purdue run thin because the Vols tried to hire Greg Schiano four days later. That’s a shame, because it ranks as Tennessee’s most exciting win of the decade via KenPom, besting this year’s win at Vanderbilt, the four-overtime win at Texas A&M in 2013, and our one and only Sweet 16 victory over Ohio State in 2010. That’s thanks to in-game fluctuations like these:

• Purdue up 27-16 with five minutes left in the first half
• And-one and two threes from Lamonte Turner over the next two minutes
• Game tied at halftime
• Vols up seven with 14 minutes to play
• Purdue back in front with 11 minutes to play
• Vols up six with six minutes to play
• Purdue back in front with three minutes to play
• Purdue up 63-60 with 18 seconds left; Lamonte Turner three forces OT
• Grant Williams bucket, then 7-0 Purdue run, then a Kyle Alexander (!) three
• Williams-to-Alexander slam, Vols up one with 45 seconds left
• Purdue scores to retake the lead
• Grant Williams backs down from the elbow, go-ahead score with 14 seconds left
• Purdue miss, Admiral Schofield makes a diving save on the rebound to James Daniel with two seconds to go. Free throws, victory.

Purdue went on to the NCAA Tournament as a No. 2 seed, made it to the Sweet 16, and lost to Texas Tech by 13. The year before Purdue made the Sweet 16 as a No. 4 seed, but lost to Kansas by 32. Carsen Edwards has been around for all three trips. This round has been an issue. We saw what an adventure it was for the Vols to put their second round demons to rest. What will it take to keep Purdue’s alive?

The Two Big Differences

Purdue has nine losses to Tennessee’s five, but since a 6-5 start (including losses to Virginia Tech, Florida State, and Michigan) the Boilermakers are 19-4. In KenPom the Vols are third in offense and 33rd in defense; Purdue is fifth and 27th. The shooting numbers are real, spectacular, and almost identical. And if you think the Vols run a lot of their offense through Grant Williams, Carsen Edwards is involved in 34.6% of Purdue’s possessions, tenth nationally. There’s a lot to love about both teams.

But two things stand out in this match-up: Purdue’s offensive rebounding, and Tennessee’s shot blocking.

The Boilermakers get it back on 34.9% of their attempts. Most of those attempts come from Edwards, freeing up everyone else to go to the glass. And everyone else is freaking huge: the rest of the starters all go 6’6″ until you get to the end, where you’ll find 7’3″ Matt Haarms (the Vols saddled him with foul trouble last year). Then off the bench it’s 6’9″ freshman Trevion Williams, 6’9″ freshman Aaron Wheeler, and 6’8″ Evan Boudreaux.

Also, a note about starter Grady Eifert. He doesn’t get a lot of touches with Edwards and all that size. But when he touches it, it goes in: Eifert is ranked first nationally in KenPom’s offensive rating, 31-of-44 (70.5%) from two and 34-of-77 (44.2%) from three. He might be the player you’re most likely to lose in this offense. Don’t do that.

Generally, it’s going to Edwards, it’s going up, and Purdue is crashing if it doesn’t go in. So there should be opportunities in transition…but the Vols have to get the rebound first.

There’s some good news: the Boilermakers had 18 offensive rebounds against Michigan State, but lost (they had 13 in the rematch and won). They had 16 in a loss to Minnesota. It’s not a hard and fast rule. But it’s one the Vols have been relatively victimized by before: nine for Kansas, 10 for Auburn in Nashville, 11 for Kentucky, 12 for LSU. Purdue lives on the offensive glass. The Vols don’t always die there, but they’ve been vulnerable.

But Purdue is vulnerable at the rim as well: 11.3% of the Boilermakers’ shots get rejected. This is, in part, what can happen when a 6’1″ player takes 37.4% of your shots, the sixth-highest percentage in the nation. By comparison, Admiral Schofield takes 29.1% of Tennessee’s shots to lead the Vols. Beyond Edwards, this also highlights the one-on-one battles in the paint: Tennessee has to hold their own on the defensive glass, and must be aggressive in shot-blocking without falling into foul trouble. The Vols are 11th nationally in shot-blocking percentage. Without question, this is a massive game for Kyle Alexander.

The fouls bring up a consistent question down the stretch for the Vols: what will they get from Yves Pons and Derrick Walker? They’ve both played short shifts in the last few games, typically averaging about four total minutes. What happens in those four minutes? Neither is out there to score. But Pons had a turnover against Colgate and Iowa, Walker a turnover and two fouls in three minutes against the Hawkeyes. The Vols need their eighth and ninth players to do no harm.

This game is a coin flip any which way you want it. It has the potential to be as exciting as the one we saw last year. So much has changed since then. So much still can for the victor.

As the Vols march onward to the Sweet 16 this Thursday, with dreams of the program’s first Final Four still very much alive, Head Coach Rick Barnes and his staff are not taking their foot off the recruiting pedal.  As we’ve discussed back in January, despite currently being full for the 2019-20 season in terms of scholarships, the odds of at least one opening up are very high and the staff should be recruiting as such.  Regardless of how they open up – whether it’s from early NBA entry or transfer, or both, the Vols are absolutely still set up to have another strong season.  However, laying the groundwork to add at least one more player to the roster should the opportunity present itself is imperative so that the 2019-20 season isn’t just a bridge season between this Sweet 16+ year and what should be a talent-laden 2020-21 roster.  There are multiple avenues that Tennessee can go down in order to find new players, and below we again take a look at where the Vols are in each of them

Signed 2019 Recruits Who Could Get Out of LOIs or Unsigned 2019 Recruits

As the season has ended for all but the 16 teams left in the NCAA Tournament and whoever is left in the NIT/CBI tournaments, there has already been turnover in the coaching ranks nationwide, including Texas A&M, Vanderbilt, and Alabama in the SEC.  With that has come unsigned prospects decommitting and those that signed in the early period asking out of their LOIs.  While so far that hasn’t been any real news regarding Tennessee reaching out to any of those prospects, former Texas A&M signee Kobe Brown, an athletic 6’7 wing from Huntsville, AL, did hold an offer from the Vols.  Whether he or any other 2019 players who are back on the market receive interest from Tennessee remains to be seen, but it’s something to keep an eye on.

There are also always prospects who, for whatever reasons – a late push towards being eligible, being under the radar, or a monster senior – are unsigned as late as March/April.  The Vols are looking into a handful of them, including a pair of late-blooming players with length in 6’8 F Oliver Robinson-Nkamhou and 6’9 Wing Isaiah Ihnen.

The Finnish-born Robinson-Nkamhoua has been under the radar not just due to his roots but also because a broken leg caused him to miss his junior season.  However, he’s had a big winter for a Maryland high school that Barnes is familiar with from his days at George Mason.  At his size he’s got versatility on the offensive end, with the ability to slash to the rim and also shoot from distance.  He’s not a traditional PF but more of a new-age player who can excel both inside and out.   After receiving offers from the likes of Maryland, Arkansas, Illinois, Pitt, Minnesota, and Wake Forest, he got an offer from the Vols early this month.  There isn’t a lot of news in terms of his interest but should there in fact be scholarships available he’ll get a long look.

The same goes for Ihnen, who currently plays in his native Germany.  Despite being listed at an inch taller than Robinson-Nkamhoua, Ihnen profiles as more of a wing player and even less of a banger, but like Robinson-Nkamhoua he profiles as a versatile defender with the ability to defend multiple positions.  He’s certainly confident in his outside shot, and seems to have eliminated Texas, Oregon, and Arizona State from his initial Top 6 and plans to visit Minnesota, TCU, and Tennessee between April 19^th-24^th. 

2020 Reclassifiers

When it comes to prospects who could possibly reclassify from the 2020 class to 2019, there has been some Vol-related news.  5-star C Walker Kessler, who has rescheduled two official visits to Tennessee, is no longer considering moving into the 2019 class.  How that affects Tennessee’s recruitment remains to be seen, but that’s a story for down the road.  At the same time, 5-star Wing Kyree Walker, who many think will reclassify, was just recently contacted by Tennessee.  We’ll see if anything transpires between Walker and Tennessee, but that would be a massive development.

Grad Transfers

Charlotte native and UALR Guard Rayjon Tucker is the first known graduate transfer to have heard from Tennessee.  At 6’5, 210, Tucker averaged 20.3 points and 6.7 rebounds per game this past season and is a career 41.7% three-point shooter.  He’s also heard from Gonzaga, Michigan, Arizona, and NC State among others, so this profiles as likely one of the most high-profile grad transfer recruitments of the spring.

Tennessee most certainly will reach out to multiple other grad transfers as they both become available and also as the Vols have a better sense of their roster going forward. 

What’s Next?

Which direction the Tennessee decides to take with any available spots will very likely depend on how many are actually open as well as the reason for their availability. There are numerous variables to consider, including but not limited to:

1. How soon does Tennessee need the new player to help?   If Grant Williams and Jordan Bone both return then Barnes might opt to go all-in for another run at a title and value the experience a grad transfer would bring.  Conversely, if both were to leave Tennessee will still have a strong nucleus but could also use experienced talent to ensure a third straight NCAA tournament appearance, essential to not just keep the recruiting momentum going but also to truly stamp Tennessee as a rising elite non-blue blood program
2. How long will a new player tie up a scholarship?  The Vols already have a commitment from borderline 5-star Corey Walker and are almost certain to sign a Top 10 2020 class with nothing but 4 and 5-star prospects.  This will be the year that the staff’s groundwork will perfectly coincide with the program’s rising national profile, and the list of true bluechippers who have Tennessee right at the top of their list is very, very long.  So when it comes to potential roster openings the staff will absolutely need to be cognizant of filling a scholarship with a “nice” player in 2019 that could otherwise be used to sign another stud prospect in 2020.  That’s of course where grad transfers also bring value, as they’re just one-year rentals.  Obviously a guy like Kyree Walker is the kind of stud you don’t turn down, but Tennessee already has two 2019 signees in Davonte Gaines and Drew Pember who are more developmental prospects than plug and play guys, so that should come into play when the staff is evaluating guys like Robinson-Nkamhoua and Ihnen specifically
3. Where are the needs?  Regardless of whether Grant returns or not, given the relatively little production that Tennessee has gotten from its post depth players this season one would think that Barnes will prioritize a PF/C type player, either from the grad transfer market or a 4-year signee who the staff thinks can help right away.  But again, one could also argue that you can never have too many versatile players (read: Wings) and you can never have too many shooters.  Part of this assessment will also come from the staff’s projection of how guys like Derrick Walker, John Fulkerson, and DJ Burns are going to develop between the end of this season and the beginning of the next.  Because the Vols do have bodies in the post; it’s just that it’s hard to be confident about those guys playing major minutes next season based on what we’ve seen from them (or not see, in Burns’ case) this season

A big theme in this space has been that as Tennessee has begun to win at a high level the last two seasons – a level certainly not since Bruce Pearl was wearing a Big Orange jacket and at very few times before – its recruiting profile has dramatically increased in tandem.  And while Coach Barnes has done this winning with (stop me if you’ve heard this before) unheralded recruits, it stands to reason that the program is more likely to continue its winning ways, and hopefully take further steps forward, with more highly ranked recruits.  Barnes is recruiting a specific type of player and clearly, explicitly or not, modeling his program after the likes of Michigan and UVA and Villanova: non-blue blood programs who nonetheless recruit blue-chip players, win at an incredibly high rate and contend for championships.  From its rabid fanbase to the best facilities and in the country to a coach with an impeccable reputation as both a leader of young men and a developer of talent, there is absolutely every reason to think Barnes can get Tennessee there, and quickly. 

But roster development and enhancement never stops, and therefore recruiting never stops.  So while we savor the moment Thursday night when the Vols make their 6^th Sweet 16 appearance since 2000 and (hopefully) move on, be ready for more on the recruiting front.  It will start with any potential defections that create 2019-20 roster spots and continue with what is setting up to be the best class Tennessee basketball has ever signed.  Stay tuned…

Will’s already said all that really needs to be said about Tennessee’s 83-77 overtime win over the Iowa Hawkeyes to advance to the Sweet 16 in the 2019 NCAA Tournament. The only additional takeaways from a four factors perspective are that the second half was not like the rest of the game and that overall, the Vols did just well enough to win.

What they needed to do was play inside-out, shoot well, and defend well without fouling too much. What they did was toe the line on all of that without somehow falling into the abyss. They still put up 20 threes, but most were open because they came after paint touches, and they hit them at a 40% clip. They held the Hawkeyes to 39% from the field and 33.3% from the arc, but they put them on the line 32 times doing it. Turnovers weren’t supposed to be a factor, but once again, Tennessee got overly charitable in this department, particularly in the second half.

That’s how you find yourself in an overtime game in the NCAA Tournament. But the Vols survived. And now they advance.

So, here’s a look at the four factors numbers for Tennessee’s next game against the Purdue Boilermakers. As before, the conclusions are up front, and the details follow:

Summary and Score Prediction

The goals for the Vols:

1. Rebound. Rebound. Rebound.
2. As always, play inside-out and shoot well.
3. Dial up the defensive aggression.
4. No more naps.

Four Factors: Straight-Up

Effective FG%

• Tennessee 55.2 (No. 21)
• Purdue 53.0 (No. 78)

Prior opponents:

• Iowa 52.9 (No. 77)
• Colgate 55.9 (No. 14)
• Auburn 53.9 (No. 51)
• Mississippi State 54.6 (No. 36)
• Kentucky 53.6 (No. 59)
• Ole Miss 53.5 (No. 64)
• LSU: 52.7 (No. 93)
• Vanderbilt: 50.3 (No. 198)
• Kentucky: 52.8 (No. 93)

Conclusions: Basically, Iowa.

Turnover %

• Tennessee 16.1 (No. 27) (but trending in the wrong direction quickly)
• Purdue 16.1 (No. 28)

Prior opponents:

• Iowa 17.2 (No. 83)
• Colgate 19.3 (No. 232)
• Auburn 18.3 (No. 151)
• Mississippi State 19.1 (No. 220)
• Kentucky 18.7 (No. 185)
• Ole Miss 18.7 (No. 172)
• LSU 19.0 (No. 196)
• Vanderbilt: 19.9 (No. 255)
• Kentucky: 18.5 (No. 158)

Conclusions: Basically, us. Let’s hope they’re trending in the wrong direction, too.

Offensive Rebound %

• Tennessee 31.9 (No. 63)
• Purdue 34.9 (No. 18)

Prior opponents:

• Iowa 29.8 (No. 114)
• Colgate 30.3 (No. 103)
• Auburn 33.5 (No. 39)
• Mississippi State 34.6 (No. 23)
• Kentucky 37.9 (No. 4)
• Ole Miss 31.9 (No. 64)
• LSU 37.4 (No. 6)
• Vanderbilt: 28.6 (No. 178)
• Kentucky: 38.3 (No. 3)

Conclusions: Uh oh. Basically, these guys are like Kentucky and LSU. Let’s hope they don’t shoot a lot of free throws, too.

Free Throw Rate

• Tennessee 33.0 (No. 183)
• Purdue 29.5 (No. 275)

Prior opponents:

• Iowa 42.0 (No. 16)
• Colgate 28.9 (No. 285)
• Auburn 30.9 (No. 245)
• Mississippi State 33.0 (No. 188)
• Kentucky 42.2 (No. 14)
• Ole Miss 32.8 (No. 200)
• LSU 39.8 (No. 29)
• Vanderbilt: 44.8 (No. 7)
• Kentucky: 41 (No. 22)

Conclusions: Oh, good. Basically, these guys get to the line about the same as Colgate. Time to dial up that aggression on defense, guys.

Those are the straight-up comparisons of the teams’ respective averages in the four factors, but what about the fact that those numbers are impacted in any given game by the opponent?

Four Factors: Opponent impact

Effective FG%

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s EFG% is 55.2 (No. 21), while Purdue’s defense against that is 48.7 (No. 80). They defend much better than Iowa, so expect good shots to be more difficult to find. Remember, we’re not bowling; we’re playing basketball, and if we’re not shooting as well, Purdue might just be part of the reason.

When Purdue has the ball

The Boilermakers’ EFG% is 53.0 (No. 78), while Tennessee’s shooting defense is 47.6 (No. 36). The numbers are essentially the same in this category as they were for the Iowa game during which the Vols did pretty well limiting the Hawkeyes’ EFG%.

Conclusions

Expect Tennessee to have more difficulty getting good shots against Purdue than it did against Iowa. On the other end, the starting point is pretty much suggesting that this is the same game as the one the Vols just played. Overall, they did fine defending against Iowa, and if they can eliminate that second half lapse, they’ll be better than fine in this category against Purdue. They should also be able to turn up the defense a bit due to the Boilermakers’ usual free throw rate (see below).

Bottom line, expect a bigger challenge on the offensive end for the Vols, but hopefully it’s easier enough on the defensive end to still win the EFG% game.

Turnover %

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s turnover % is 16.1 (No. 27), while Purdue’s defensive counterpart to this category is 19.2 (No. 122).

When Purdue has the ball

Purdue’s turnover % is 16.1 (No. 28), while’s Tennessee’s ability to force turnovers is 18.2 (No. 183).

Conclusions

I’ve been wrong on turnovers ever since the Vols started playing tournament teams, so I fully expect Tennessee to give away a bucketful of turnovers despite what the numbers say. It will probably come during nap time, which starts at the second-half tip and continues through the under 12:00 timeout.

Offensive Rebounding %

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s OR% is 31.9 (No. 63), while Purdue’s defense in that category is 26.5 (No. 97).

When Purdue has the ball

The Boilermakers’ OR% is 34.9 (No. 18), while the Vols’ defense in that category is 30.2 (No. 262). This is Purdue’s biggest advantage of the game.

Conclusions

That’s a huge disparity between what Purdue does best and what the Vols’ do worst. It’s downright frightening.

But honestly, since we started doing this four-factors feature months ago, I really don’t remember OR% ever having much of an impact on the outcome of any particular game.

Still, all the good EFG% defense in the world won’t matter if you just keep giving them do-overs. I’d expect the team to put some additional emphasis on defensive rebounding. They may not win in this category (although they did last year), but they need to make sure it isn’t what costs them the game.

Free Throw Rate

When Tennessee has the ball

Tennessee’s FT Rate is 33.0 (No. 183), while Purdue’s defense against that is 31.4 (No. 138).

When Purdue has the ball

The Boilermakers’ FT Rate is 29.5 (No. 275), while Tennessee’s defense against that is 34.4 (No. 224).

Conclusions

This to me says that it’s okay for the Vols to dial up the defensive pressure unless and until it starts triggering bad fouls.

Summary and Score Prediction

It should go without saying that anything can happen in a game like this, but it appears that the Vols should end the game with a better shooting percentage than the Boilermakers and Purdue should end up with more opportunities due primarily to their rebounding advantage. If Tennessee decides to get turnover-happy again, it could end a magical season.

The goals for the Vols:

1. Rebound. Rebound. Rebound.
2. As always, play inside-out and shoot well.
3. Dial up the defensive aggression.
4. No more naps.

This game is basically a coin flip. KenPom gives Tennessee a 49% chance of winning and puts the score at Purdue 75, Tennessee 74. The current line is Tennessee -1.

Go Vols.