Tennessee head coach Jeremy Pruitt’s introductory press conference live stream

Tennessee will be holding a press conference to officially welcome new head coach Jeremy Pruitt this evening at 6:05. The video stream is embedded below so we GRTers can watch it and talk about it right here. I’ll be doing my best to paraphrase on the fly in the comment section below for anyone who’s not able to watch the video.

Brad will be along shortly after the press conference concludes with his recap and thoughts, and then he, Will, and I will be recording a live-streamed podcast starting at 8:30.

So, watch for all of that here tonight. It’s been a good day on Rocky Top, and even better days are ahead.

 

Report: USC’s Tyson Helton to be Tennessee’s Offensive Coordinator

Jeremy Pruitt works fast:  VolQuest is reporting Southern Cal passing game coordinator Tyson Helton will be Tennessee’s new offensive coordinator. He will lead an offensive staff including Robert Gillespie staying on with running backs, and Colorado State offensive coordinator Will Friend coming aboard as offensive line coach, plus a familiar face in the secondary:

 

Tyson Helton is the younger brother of the Trojans’ head coach Clay Helton. He has served as USC’s passing game coordinator the last two years.

This is a strange twist of fate for Tee Martin, no doubt, who serves as USC’s offensive coordinator. The former Vol didn’t appear to be among the finalists for Tennessee’s head coaching vacancy, and now one of his colleagues heads to Knoxville as offensive coordinator.

I have no idea what kind of head coach Tee Martin would be; I hope a tremendous one. But Tennessee’s previous coaching staff serves as somewhat of a warning for hires of convenience or friendship. Butch Jones brought almost his entire staff from Cincinnati to Knoxville initially, then made comfort hires at offensive coordinator when change presented itself. Mike DeBord never got the benefit of the doubt at Tennessee, in part for this very reason; he orchestrated the best offense in college football last November. But Larry Scott’s promotion was disastrous for Tennessee and ultimately for Butch Jones. A failure to operate outside of comfort zones on offense and/or the elevation of recruiting over scheme handcuffed Tennessee’s offense.

Tyson Helton is a move in a different direction, in what may be Pruitt’s most important hire.

As Southern Cal’s passing game coordinator, Helton led the Trojans to the eighth-best passing offense in S&P+ this year (see USC’s full advanced statistical profile at Football Study Hall); they finished fourth nationally in the same metric last year. Sam Darnold is eighth nationally in yards per attempt among QBs with 300+ attempts. Helton and Martin obviously did a good job helping Darnold position himself as one of the top picks in the 2018 NFL Draft.

Before joining his brother at USC, Helton worked with another name Tennessee fans have salivated over in the past two weeks:  he was the offensive coordinator under Jeff Brohm at Western Kentucky.

Brohm has been the play-caller at WKU and Purdue, an important point. But Helton’s role as offensive coordinator and quarterbacks coach helped produce incredible offenses in 2014 and 2015. In 2015 the Hilltopper offense finished fourth nationally in S&P+ (see Western Kentucky’s advanced statistical profile), third in yards per play, and third in points per game. They were fifth and sixth nationally in those last two categories in 2014.

Helton has studied under Brohm and coached a potential number one overall draft pick alongside Tee Martin. Now he’ll get his chance in a bigger role with play-calling responsibilities. It’s a big hire for Jeremy Pruitt, but I like the background, the willingness to go outside the familiar, and the emphasis on scheme.

The Bricks and The Ceiling

I’ve already been wrong about Jeremy Pruitt once. Fourteen months ago, #9 Tennessee and #1 Alabama played the highest-ranked Third Saturday in October ever. The Vols had just dropped 684 yards on Texas A&M, and touched up Georgia’s defenses for 920 yards and 70 points in their last two meetings with Pruitt. Despite a number of injuries against the Aggies, I thought the Vols would beat Alabama and continue their magical season, based largely on what I thought Tennessee’s offense would do against Alabama’s defense.

Instead, most of those injured players didn’t return, and Alabama held Tennessee to 163 yards and 2.59 yards per play. It was the worst yards per play performance by a Tennessee offense in the last ten years…until we played Alabama this year, and got 2.35.

 

The magic ran out for Tennessee on that October day in 2016, and indeed for Butch Jones too. It peaked between the hedges two weeks earlier and at least a dozen narratives ago. After starting 5-0 last year, the Vols are 8-12 in their last 20 games. And the team on the other end of that hail mary looks mighty fine today.

What’s behind the emphasis on defense and discipline?

I’m sure Kirby Smart’s success made all three of Tennessee’s finalists more appealing; Georgia’s head coach would have no doubt been mentioned in the press conference as an example of what could be had the Vols hired Kevin Steele or Mel Tucker, and you can expect to hear it when they’re introducing Jeremy Pruitt. But I wonder if something else was in Tennessee’s motivation to lean in that direction – it was John Currie’s first choice too with Greg Schiano – and not, we know now, because Tee Martin was guaranteed to come in on the offensive side of the ball.

Coaching hires are indeed pendulum swings, so it makes sense to hire a defensive coach after five years of the Butch Jones offense. But the more pressing need (and the more apparent one to those behind the scenes, perhaps) may have been discipline and roster management. How many talented players in significant roles failed to finish their careers at Tennessee under the previous administration? It wasn’t just the weirdness of Jalen Hurd’s story. There’s a long list from Marquez North to Jauan Jennings.

Butch Jones knew how to recruit elite talent, but coaching it and keeping it were not his strong suits. This was an unchecked box for some candidates as well, but having spent the last five years as the defensive coordinator at Florida State, Georgia, and Alabama, it does not appear to be an issue for Jeremy Pruitt.

Are we better off?

The default position for Tennessee fans will be, “Yes.” And I might agree even if I wasn’t one.

Moving on from an athletic director who was so out of touch with both football and the fan base that Greg Schiano was his go-to choice, then replacing him with Phillip Fulmer? That still feels like a win on its own. Is Tennessee better off with Fulmer and Jeremy Pruitt than they would have been with Currie and Mike Leach? I don’t know how that answer will play itself out on fall Saturdays in the near future. But considering Leach was the emergency option for Currie only after missing on Dave Doeren? I would still take Pruitt and Fulmer’s leadership.

I remain hopeful Tennessee’s revolt against the Schiano pick and the resulting power shift will be a good thing long-term. In the short-term, Pruitt is as good as Tennessee and Fulmer had any right to do after this crazy set of days.

A ceiling hire

There are no sure things in this business, and throwing money at the problem is no guarantee. Florida State, one of the few jobs clearly better than ours even when we are at our best, just hired a coach who was in the third tier of many of our initial hot boards. And they hired him in a hurry. Some Tennessee fans better hope they were right about Dan Mullen.

However, even unable to lure a proven winner, even after a fan uprising and a change in athletic director, and even after the worst season in program history…Tennessee still made a ceiling hire. And I’m very impressed with this.

The Vols could have taken the safe option and hired Les Miles, or the easy option and hired Tee Martin. Both would have been very well received initially and sold their fair share of tickets. But the Vols, despite everything, still made a hire with their eyes on the biggest prize. Credit Fulmer, who would know about such things.

To be clear, there are risks. It might be that Jeremy Pruitt is an excellent defensive coordinator and a lousy head coach. We don’t know. Butch Jones had a higher floor (or so we all thought at the time). But Pruitt has a higher ceiling than both Jones and Derek Dooley on the day they took this job. And he probably has a higher ceiling than Les Miles in 2017.

This search was a mess. It will take time to fully digest, and it will stay in the news, and not just because of lawyers. If Pruitt struggles early or often, Tennessee fans will get some of the blame. That narrative is already alive and well and will be convenient for some in the national media to return to. The same unity that sparked all of this will be necessary in the months ahead.

But at the search’s end, Tennessee still hired a coach it believes can win the biggest prize here. I’m not sure they could say that with a straight face at the last two press conferences. And since it will be Fulmer’s face this time, there’s all the more reason to believe it.

Reports: Tennessee Finalizing Deal with Alabama DC Jeremy Pruitt to be new Head Coach

After a coaching search that felt like it spanned generations, took years off lives, ended jobs, tarnished reputations, caused power struggles between a major university’s boosters and administrators — as well as power struggles between most orange-clad men and the wives angry that they’d become married to their F5 buttons — the Tennessee Volunteers finally maybe, probably, hopefully have their man.

We think.

Possibly.

According to multiple reports from ESPN’s Mark Schlabach, Chris Low and Brett McMurphy to GoVols247’s Patrick Brown to VolQuest’s Brent Hubbs to everyone else in the free world with a Twitter account and a source, the Vols will name Alabama defensive coordinator Jeremy Pruitt as head coach on Thursday.

Barring any snags.

Schlabach also reported this hiring likely means the end of any chances USC offensive coordinator Tee Martin returns home to Knoxville at this time.

It’s important to note the caveat that nothing is COMPLETELY finalized yet, considering the “snag” Ohio State defensive coordinator Greg Schiano encountered two Sundays ago, the “snag” that made Purdue coach Jeff Brohm’s name magically disappear and the “snag” that obliterated a verbal agreement for Mike Leach to come to UT.

If none of the snags occur that have basically turned this Tennessee search into a minefield over the course of three weeks, Pruitt will be the new head man in orange. He’s the culmination of a five-day search since Phillip Fulmer took over as athletic director following John Currie’s firing.

Fulmer dipped his toe in the water on Gary Patterson, Chris Petersen and Justin Fuente reportedly, but didn’t get much reception. Once that happened, his search mostly focused on three SEC defensive gurus and SMU offensive-minded head coach Chad Morris, the former Clemson offensive coordinator.

The Morris flirtation didn’t progress as far as the other three, and he took the Arkansas job on Wednesday. Fulmer, meanwhile, conducted multiple interviews with old friend, former Tennessee linebacker and Auburn defensive coordinator Kevin Steele, Georgia defensive coordinator Mel Tucker and Alabama DC Pruitt.

If the search ultimately yields Pruitt, it’s a win for the Vols when it looked like there was no way this search could finish with one. Without question, no matter how great it was that #VolTwitter, fans and students banded together to stop the Schiano hire, it helped perpetuate the idea of a difficult environment in Knoxville.

The toxicity continued as Currie went rogue following failed attempts to hire Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy, perhaps Brohm and definitely N.C. State coach Dave Doeren. He reportedly took a former Kansas State booster’s plane to the West Coast to interview Leach, was ordered home by UT chancellor Beverly Davenport and fired on the spot last Friday morning.

Fulmer’s search began, and he took some big swings before settling on a trio of tough, defensive-minded coaches with SEC roots and strong recruiting resumes. Perhaps the strongest was Pruitt’s, who knocked his interviews out of the park and ended up the main focus.

Now, if his name actually somehow finds paper in the morning and this thing is official, the focus will be on the coaching staff and recruiting. Can Pruitt bring with him any of Alabama’s marquee commitments he was recruiting? Can he somehow convince Tosh Lupoi to join him in Knoxville rather than being the next in line to be ‘Bama’s defensive coordinator? If not, will the focus zero in on Georgia’s linebackers coach Kevin Sherrer?

Is there any truth to the rumors that Pruitt could bring with him old buddy Chip Lindsay to be Tennessee’s offensive coordinator after just one (successful) season as Gus Malzahn’s coordinator at Auburn? Will former Arkansas offensive coordinator Dan Enos get a look in Knoxville?

There is still a lot of intrigue remaining in all this, but it looks [at least right now] like Tennessee got its head man after a long, national embarrassment.

Finally.

Now, just don’t go screw it up, Vols.

Current Tennessee coaching candidate blind taste test

When Phillip Fulmer took over as Tennessee’s athletic director last Friday, the Vols didn’t just hit the reset button on their coaching search, they mashed it a good one. Suddenly, we went from lists that included scores and scores of names and media outlets that all said something different to most media members reporting the same smaller handful of names. Maybe the chef has assumed sole command the kitchen so he could cook up something palatable to the starving masses.

Word is that Fulmer is wanting to make a decision by the end of the day today. If that’s true, we should know something soon after that, perhaps by Thursday. For now, though, let’s compare the short resumes of the guys that appear to be in the running and see how everything looks when you’re not focusing on their names.

 

Coach 1

  • Head coach, second-level program for three years
  • Coordinator, top-level program for four years before that

S&P+ as head coach

  • 2017: 60 (8/93)
  • 2016: 90 (72/126)
  • 2015: 103 (63/74)

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2014: 76
  • 2013: 12
  • 2012: 14
  • 2011: 25

Recruiter Rankings

  • 2017 (head coach, second-level): Not in the Top 500
  • 2016 (head coach, second-level): Not in the Top 500
  • 2015 (head coach, second-level): 427
  • 2014 (coordinator, top-level): 75
  • 2013 (coordinator, top-level): 76

Coach 2

  • Head coach, top-level program for 11 years

S&P+ as head coach

  • 2016: 4 (22/3)
  • 2015: 11 (14/28)
  • 2014: 20 (58/9)
  • 2013: 13 (14/28)
  • 2012: 11 (36/7)
  • 2011: 1 (13/2)
  • 2010: 15 (42/3)
  • 2009: 12 (37/9)
  • 2008: 24 (28/34)
  • 2007: 2 (13/3)
  • 2006: 5 (12/6)
  • 2005: 9 (29/10)

Recruiter Rankings

  • Not in the Top 500 for any year on record

Coach 3

  • Coordinator, two top-level programs for three years

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2017: 5
  • 2016: 9
  • 2015: 28

Recruiter Rankings

  • 2017: 453
  • 2016: 267
  • 2015: N/A

Coach 4

  • Coordinator, two top-level programs for three years

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2017: 8
  • 2016: 35
  • 2015: 1

Recruiter Rankings

  • 2017: 20
  • 2016: 18
  • 2015: N/A

Coach 5

  • Coordinator, three top-level programs for five years

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2017: 3
  • 2016: 1
  • 2015: 11
  • 2014: 16
  • 2015: 7

Recruiter Rankings

  • 2017: 149
  • 2016: 71
  • 2015: 37
  • 2014: 36
  • 2013: 1

Coach 6

  • Coordinator, one top-level program for six years

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2017: 2
  • 2016: 6
  • 2015: 6
  • 2014: 1
  • 2015: 41
  • 2014: 62

Recruiter Rankings

  • 2017: 40
  • 2016: 6
  • 2015: 35
  • 2014: 227
  • 2013: 44

Coach 7

  • Coordinator, one top-level program for two years

S&P+ as coordinator

  • 2017: 15
  • 2016: 12

Recruiter Rankings as coordinator

  • 2017: 11
  • 2016: 1

Recruiter Rankings as position coach

  • 2015: 2
  • 2014: 2
  • 2013: 92

My Results

Just going off these numbers, as much as I can do so blindly after having done the research, here’s the way I think I’d rank them:

  1. Coach 2 — Head coaching experience at a major program over an extended period with excellent overall results. Not listed as a recruiter anywhere, but presumably his staff could recruit.
  2. Coach 5 – Five years as a coordinator, and excelled all five years. Did it at three different programs, so it’s not a fluke. Also a solid recruiter.
  3. Coach 6 – This guy is basically the same as Coach 5, except he’s only done it at one place.
  4. Coach 4 – A coordinator at two major programs with excellent numbers and elite recruiting to boot.
  5. Coach 7 – Basically Coach 4 with one year less experience, but arguably with even more promise, both in stats and recruiting ability.
  6. Coach 3 – This guy is Coach 4, but with worse recruiting.
  7. Coach 1 – Head coaching experience at a second-tier program after four years as a major program coordinator. As a coordinator, he looked much like the other coordinators on the list, but recruiting wasn’t elite. As a head coach, he has decent numbers on one side of the ball in his third year, but not on the other.

That’s how I’d rank them at this time. What do y’all think?

 


Here’s the key:

  • Coach 1: SMU head coach Chad Morris (formerly OC of Clemson)
  • Coach 2: Former LSU head coach Les Miles
  • Coach 3: Auburn defensive coordinator Kevin Steele (formerly DC of LSU)
  • Coach 4: Georgia defensive coordinator Mel Tucker (formerly DC of Alabama)
  • Coach 5: Alabama defensive coordinator Jeremy Pruitt (formerly DC of Georgia and FSU)
  • Coach 6: Clemson defensive coordinator Brent Venables
  • Coach 7: USC offensive coordinator Tee Martin

Feels Like Home

When Tennessee’s search came up empty in Raleigh on Thursday morning, it seemed like two options were available. The Vols could press pause, take a breath after the events of an unprecedented week, and reset the board. Or the Vols could press on, try to make a hire as quickly as possible to change the narrative, and “settle” for a down-the-board unproven.

Thursday afternoon, John Currie instead went for door number three: let’s get Mike Leach, and let’s get weird. In their desperation, they turned to a man they didn’t fully understand. And what a grand experiment this would have been.

Then on Friday morning, weird and unprecedented collided head-on. And on Friday afternoon, at the end of our most insane week at the end of our most insane decade…on Friday afternoon, Tennessee found its way home.

To be clear, the house needs a lot of work. The brick-by-brick renovations looked good for a moment, but ultimately had to be torn down. But today, Phillip Fulmer is the athletic director, and Tennessee feels like home.

This has to be the culmination of the insanity.

We throw “rock bottom” around too often; at the end of the program’s first 4-8 season it’s easy to do. The Vols may continue to struggle on the field in the short-term, and no athletic program of this size and stature runs without drama. But if Tennessee is going to move forward in a meaningful way, Friday has to be the end of the madness.

Tennessee forced Fulmer out at the tail end of the 2008 season, one year after he won 10 games and his fifth division title. They replaced him with Lane Kiffin. Since then:

  • Kiffin left in the middle of the night to take the Southern Cal job after just one season in January 2010.
  • The Vols hired Derek Dooley fresh off a 4-8 season at Louisiana Tech.
  • Bruce Pearl took the basketball program to its first Elite Eight in March 2010, then lost his job one year later, in part for lying about a photograph taken at a BBQ, for which he received a three-year show cause.
  • Derek Dooley was fired after three years by Dave Hart, who replaced Mike Hamilton as athletic director. The Vols had Charlie Strong, then didn’t, and ended up hiring Butch Jones.
  • Cuonzo Martin took the Vols to the Sweet 16 in 2014, then left for California after a low-ball offer from Dave Hart, who chose not to denounce an in-season petition for Bruce Pearl’s return.
  • Hart hired Donnie Tyndall in April 2014. In November, the NCAA announced an investigation into his time at Southern Miss. He was fired after one season in Knoxville.
  • Hart retired, in part due to the university’s involvement in a Title IX lawsuit alleging a culture of rape at Tennessee, as did chancellor Jimmy Cheek. Beverly Davenport replaced Cheek, then hired John Currie to replace Dave Hart.
  • Butch Jones signed a pair of Top 10 recruiting classes in 2014 and 2015, but coached that talent to only a pair of 9-4 seasons in 2015 and 2016. Tennessee lost to Florida in inexplicable fashion in 2014, 2015, and 2017, failed to win the SEC East despite beating Florida and Georgia in 2016, and missed a chance to make a New Year’s Six bowl by losing to Vanderbilt. In 2017 the Vols fell apart and finished 4-8 for the first time in program history. Jones was fired.

And then, this week.

People smarter than me, including Phillip Fulmer, will tell you Tennessee has suffered on the field and court in large part because they suffered in the board room:  the administration, the athletic department, and influential boosters playing too much tug-of-war. With Fulmer at the helm in the AD, Tennessee must start exerting the majority of its might toward the same goals. And Fulmer at the helm gives Tennessee a better chance to do so than we’ve seen in the last decade.

The long-term became more important this week.

When Tennessee lost to South Carolina and change was moving from possible to probable, this still seemed like a short-term fix. Tennessee’s senior class is small and there are still plenty of recruiting stars on the roster, unlike the turnover we saw from Kiffin-to-Dooley and Dooley-to-Butch. The Vols won nine games in 2015 and 2016, and were ranked for the first three weeks of this season. Hire the right coach and they might come in and sustain the level Butch Jones enjoyed, then hopefully level up.

Since then the Vols lost to Kentucky and were non-competitive in the second half with Missouri, LSU, and Vanderbilt. Two offensive linemen who would have been starters next year will no longer be on the team in 2018, plus a five-star legacy lineman opened up his recruitment. A legitimate conversation about whether to keep Butch Jones if he went 8-4 quickly turned into a 4-8 season, and an understanding that whoever was next would have multi-year work to do to get Tennessee back.

But as this week spiraled out of control, it became clear Tennessee’s long-term future was at stake. And it became clear this wasn’t a problem to be solved simply by making the right hire for the football team.

Friday morning, it felt like Tennessee football was more vulnerable than at any point in my lifetime. Even when the Vols hired Derek Dooley and you knew things would be bad for a couple of years, Tennessee was still just two seasons removed from an SEC East title and eight years removed from the doorstep of the BCS Championship Game. The program was relevant in a way that could (and did) survive Dooley, and survive a three-year recruiting failure from 2007-09.

But now, on the heels of 4-8 and with such instability in the athletic department, Tennessee’s long-term future was in jeopardy. At the end of a difficult decade, the perception quickly became that continuing to march to the beat of the same drum – one that thought Greg Schiano was the best option – would prevent Tennessee from getting healthy. And thus Currie is out, Fulmer is in, and the Haslams’ power seems diminished, with fan voices singing their approval.

An underrated variable in this whole equation is timing, something which finally worked in Tennessee’s favor in basketball when Rick Barnes became available as Donnie Tyndall was fired. What if Jim McElwain squeaks out those games against LSU and Texas A&M in October, and Florida doesn’t decide to make a change? Is Dan Mullen the coach in Knoxville on Sunday, and all of this mess is simply avoided?

This is the biggest question:  is what happened this week a good thing for Tennessee long-term? If the problems on The Hill were indeed systemic, changing the balance of power at the top could be a win for Tennessee even as they take a loss in the short-term. That loss has already come in the national media, though their news cycles get continually shorter. That loss may also come on the field for a season or two. But is Tennessee better off today, with Phillip Fulmer at the helm, the fan voice registering, and everyone given a new chance to pull in the same direction? The answer could be yes even if the alternatives were Jeff Brohm, Mike Leach, or another coach we liked working under the previous system.

Faith returns, hope awaits, love abides

This week I have been more grateful than ever for the teams I love (the Celtics and, for a very long time, the Braves) that are well-run organizations. Growing up with the 80’s Celtics, the 90’s Braves, and the Majors/Fulmer Vols, it was easy to have faith in your team and assume they would make good decisions, giving them the very best chance to win.

At Tennessee, I think much of this faith endured among the fan base even when the first half of the last decade could be blamed on circumstance. When the Vols ended up with Butch Jones instead of Charlie Strong five years ago, faith wavered but love remained. Tennessee fans showed up for Teams 117-121.

But it became clear on Sunday fans did not believe in those with decision making power. This could have been a helpless feeling, and perhaps is in other situations it would be; what do you do if you’re, say, a Cleveland Browns fan?

But after a week of raised voices and real threats to stop showing up – in person and in the university’s bank account – a change sparked by a unified fan voice has given us a leader we can believe in. And once more, faith stirs.

We will see about hope. We noted in the middle of last week that despite a lack of faith in this administration, they still might land a coach to provide some degree of hope. Tennessee tried to rebound with Mike Gundy, then Jeff Brohm, then went to a coach who would have struggled in this department in Dave Doeren. Some of the names from previous hot boards might get a second call, others could move up the ladder, and perhaps Fulmer has a surprise or two up his sleeve. Hiring hope can still make a real difference in ticket sales and patience.

But at the end of a remarkable week and the start of a new chapter in Tennessee athletics, love remains. Love for Tennessee was behind the voices lifted in protest on Sunday, and love for Tennessee brought Fulmer to the big chair. The house needs work, and the family may still bicker about the best way to do it, as only family can. But love for Tennessee remains our unifying factor. We will need it, and we will need to continue to pull together in the same direction before we can make room for another trophy case.

But for now, it feels good to be home. On Friday night, there was finally a chance to rest in this search. My wife and I went out to dinner, and I grabbed an orange hat on my way out the door. It felt better on my head than it had in a long time.

Go Vols.

 

Chaos’s Reward? The Return of Phillip Fulmer: Oh Captain, My Captain

 

More than nine years ago, an emotional Phillip Fulmer rode out of the Tennessee spotlight on the shoulders of his players after a career where he went 152-52. Though it had been a tumultuous final season, he exited with a win.

On Friday, Fulmer came back in on his proverbial white horse to be the UT athletic director and potential savior of a woebegone football program that has endured so much losing, embarrassment and dysfunction over the time since he was forced out that it seems like it was the program’s penance for letting him go.

All of that came to a head this week in what has played out like a daytime soap opera meets college football passion meets Game of Thrones.

In case you’ve been making moonshine in the mountains this week, here’s my quickest possible summary:

After an outpouring of indignation following the leaked announcement that John Currie, the Haslams and the rest of their cronies were going to force Greg Schiano down our throats as Tennessee’s new head coach, UT’s fan base revolted. By Sunday’s sundown, Tennessee rescinded the offer.

While that reaction was justified, the national media responded with a trailer-park frenzy of its own. The dominoes that scattered to the floor the remainder of the week amounted to warring, internal strife within the athletic department puppets and the Board of Trustees.

Long-time UT offensive assistant David Cutcliffe declined to leave Duke and try to help fix things. Then, Currie threw a bunch of money at Oklahoma State coach Mike Gundy who spurned Tennessee for the second time to stay home and coach the Cowboys.

UT spoke to SMU coach Chad Morris, though an offer was never made, and the search turned its focus toward Purdue coach Jeff Brohm. Jimmy Hyams reported Brohm would be the next head coach, but news trickled out that the UT administration balked at Brohm’s buyout. Other media outlets said the Vols never offered. 

After the Brohm “did-he-or-didn’t-he” fiasco, N.C. State coach Dave Doeren was the focus and actually had an offer. Tennessee fans, by this time brimming with anger, went the irrational route and implored Doeren on Twitter that we didn’t want him. Doeren accepted a raise to stay in Raleigh. Then, under the veil of secrecy, Currie flew to the West Coast where he interviewed Washington State head coach Mike Leach without permission from the administration, his authority minimized by this time due to the Schiano fiasco. Currie was ordered home like a child by his scolding parents, was “suspended” Friday morning, and will be fired later after only a matter of semantics leaving the deal with Leach in the ether and Fulmer at the helm with a two-year deal as athletic director. 

Got all that insanity? Yes, all of that has happened in the past six days. But perhaps the only way to really cure the major ailments that afflict the Vols was to have a very public episode.

Of course, the national media has piled on like a pack of hungry wolves, with ESPN’s GameDay crew saying just this morning we are college football’s version of the Titanic. All but a few writers who understand the climate that had been bubbling for years such as SI.com’s Andy Staples, ESPN’s Peter Burns and a limited few others, have sharpened pitchforks all week. Many of the names you normally read were quick to judge and take sides. Now, if you’re like me, those will now become names you used to normally read.

None of that matters, though. Not anymore.

The only thing that matters to us is that we can have a football program of which we can be proud. The quickest way to cease being a laughingstock off the field is not to be one on it. And the only way not to be one on it is to get a unifying force to lead this athletic department; somebody who really, truly cares about fixing football the way Alabama fixed football 11 years ago.

When Nick Saban came to Tuscaloosa, the program got better, the money started rolling in so the athletic department got better, and therefore, the university got better. Tuscaloosa isn’t only an NFL factory; it’s also printing money like no other.

Well, that’s not exactly true. Tennessee brings in plenty of money, too. Yet the administration still continues to make bumbling, middling hires that will leave us in the wilderness we entered when we fired Fulmer so long ago.

Now, thankfully, finally, Fulmer is back. He never really left, but his home in Maryville may have well been on the moon for all the say he’s had in the program over the past decade. Any time he was interviewed, you could see the hurt on his face over what we’d become. All he ever asked for was an opportunity to fix it.

That opportunity is now here.

You think Fulmer is just going to ride in here on his stallion and throw a no-name coach out there? He may have to, but he’s going to begin by fishing in deep waters. Depending on the nibbles he gets, GoVols247’s Wes Rucker said a VFL duo of Kevin Steele and Tee Martin is a possibility to return to Knoxville and help Fulmer right these wrongs. Are they the answers? At this point, who knows? But what we can and should all get behind is that there’s a man in the captain’s seat who cares about Tennessee now as much, if not more, than you and me. That should thrill us all.

This nation-wide coaching search isn’t over, but the national nightmare is. The appointment of Fulmer as athletic director effectively minimizes the involvement of the corrupt Haslams, who’d ruled Tennessee and treated it as their own personal fiefdom over the past several decades. Considering Daddy Jim Haslam was instrumental in Fulmer’s ousting, it’s safe to say the two aren’t chummy.

Friday’s decision to turn the athletic department over to Fulmer was a proverbial passing of the torch from the Haslams’ money to other donors. Now, most importantly, somebody who actually knows and cares about football will be making the football decisions.

Fulmer spoke Friday about there being a time when our football team could compete with anybody anywhere and he’s charged with making that happen again. Though it won’t be an overnight fix, the most important thing for UT fans to remember that he said is this:

“Our first job is turning around our football program,” Fulmer said. “Our football teams in recent years have struggled for a variety of reasons, but through it all we have been supported by the most passionate fan base in the country. These great fans deserve teams that make them proud.”

“It will not be easy, and it will take some time, but we will succeed. We first must find us a coach who wants to be at Tennessee, who appreciates the unique opportunity that we have to offer at this very special place at this historical time and who is driven to win at the highest level of college football; the kind of head coach who will honor our University’s values, will be proud to represent our state and be a role model for our student-athletes.

When Fulmer says it, you know it isn’t just lip service or coachspeak. You know he means it, and he has the opportunity to right the wrongs of the past decade, wrongs that started with some recruiting and hiring missteps that came under his own watch.

Fulmer didn’t spend any of his time at the podium on Friday gloating. He didn’t spend any of it talking about how he never should have been fired in the first place or even mentioning that Currie was a Mike Hamilton disciple and that it probably gave him some gratification for this entire situation to come full-circle and for him to replace the obviously overmatched Currie after only eight months on the job. Fulmer spoke of a utopian future where, perhaps, Tennessee could compete at a national level again. He understands that isn’t in the near future, but the only way to fix everything is to start on the inside and work out.

Sometimes, in order to look ahead, you have to learn from your past. Fulmer addressed that, too.

“I hope to be a stabilizing and unifying force through this, just because we do have some grey hair and lots of experience at this place, and sometimes when you’re younger, you screwed it up so bad that you figured it out later. You don’t make the same mistakes again.”

Those mistakes Fulmer made were only the tip of the iceberg that became glacier. They snowballed from the Lane Kiffin year of tearing down traditions, bending NCAA rules and leaving to the failed tenures of Derek Dooley and Butch Jones — two of the worst program fits of any hires in SEC history — to Dave Hart’s decisions to do away with the Lady Vols nickname to bumbling chancellors and university presidential leadership to Hart’s own ouster and the grueling power struggles that led to Currie being hired as the Haslams’ Yes Man at AD, to this year’s 4-8 season that was the worst in school history, to Jones’ way-too-late firing, to this past, forgettable week.

Tennessee is an also-ran and an afterthought. On a day when conference championships are being played, the Vols are sitting at home while the administration has been bursting apart at the seams.

But Fulmer — no matter how he got in the seat — is a glimmer of hope. You can talk all you want about basement-dealings, back-stabbings and cloak-and-dagger decisions, but the bottom line is we’ve tried all those other things. We’ve gone every direction possible after Fulmer, and we never could recapture what Fulmer gave us.

Now, Fulmer is back, and his legacy, in part, depends on what he can do to build us back up to what we once were. Can we emerge from our own considerable shadow to have a program of substance ever again? Neyland Stadium sits empty on the edge of the river, just waiting to be filled with happiness once again, and the last man who ever brought that inside her walls now sits at the stern of the athletic department.

Papa’s home. The Battle Captain is back. So, let’s go find us a coach and have fun winning some championships, Vols.

Report: Phillip Fulmer to be named athletic director this afternoon

Jimmy Hyams is reporting that Philip Fulmer will be named the athletic director this afternoon at 4:00.

There was some concern that Reid Sigmon was on the wrong side of the power struggle currently raging behind the curtain in the the department. Who knows.

At the least, we’ll find out whether it’s Fulmer or Sigmon at 4:00. We’ll have a live thread, so plan to be here.

It’s probably not about John Currie

Tennessee football is broken, and it’s becoming more and more evident with each passing moment that it’s broken in ways that aren’t limited to just the team or whoever the current coach happens to be. It goes much deeper than that.

We all know what has happened. What we haven’t gotten clarity on yet is why it is happening. Much of the national media lays the blame on common fans for believing they have a right to influence the decisions of the athletic department. Fans blame the coaches when the team does poorly, and after Sunday’s very public Contractus Interruptus, fans were screaming for a similar fate for athletic director John Currie. At the basketball game the other night, the arrows started reaching another rung up the ladder to Beverly Davenport.

This morning, fans got their wish as to Currie, but it came just as he’d done something right in reportedly landing Mike Leach, a win that seemed to please most Vols fans. That deal now appears to be off, if it was ever really on.

What the heck is going on here?

It’s tempting to believe that firing Currie or firing the Chancellor or whoever is at the top of the totem pole will fix the problem, but we’ve experienced an unending series of issues for nearly a decade now, and every time one problem is uprooted, another one pops up in its place.

Maybe it’s something much deeper. Maybe it’s time to stop focusing on the people who’ve been hired and fired and instead start wondering whether those people are being improperly influenced by the wrong people. Maybe there’s a common thread lurking in the shadows, shielded by the scapegoats.

This is why it is so irritating to have national media calling out the common fans for what happened Sunday. I said this in many more words a couple of days ago, but let me try to say it more succinctly this time: If you think Sunday was the first time a fan base influenced an athletic department, you’re just wrong. What was notable about Sunday was that common fans were pushing back against the rich ones.

Big money boosters (a small number of fans with a ton of money) have always had influence over the athletic department to which they give money, while common fans (a ton of fans with a little money) have never had the same privilege until technology enabled them to aggregate their influence. At most places, common fans don’t mind the big money boosters because they don’t actually screw anything up.

No, common fans wouldn’t have any problem with rich fans having influence over the department if they were actually making the program better. But if they’ve been screwing it up for a decade and there’s no way to get rid of them, your athletic department has a very serious problem.

The growing perception of common Vols fans is that the Tennessee athletic department has long been beholden to rich men with terrible judgment about football. On Sunday, the collective voice of the common fan revolted, not necessarily because the athletic department wasn’t listening to them, but because it was becoming more and more clear that some really rich guy had optioned the right to make decisions for the entire fan base and was ruining the program in the process.

The view from the stands

Common Vols fans aren’t allowed behind the curtain on The Hill, so we can only rely on whatever information we can gather from media members with sources to help us figure out what’s going on.

But when you start to see comments like this from credible national media members, you have to wonder:


So, if that’s DING DING DING true, just who is it that had Currie’s hands tied until last night?

I’m telling you right now that I don’t have sufficient sources to know, but I do know that when you venture onto Twitter or message boards or Tony Basilio’s radio show for any amount of time, the name you’ll see or hear most often is Jimmy Haslam’s.

I am not taking a position on whether Haslam is the sole problem, a problem, or not a problem at all. I’m only saying that I do believe that the program is suffering from too much influence from one or several big money boosters and that there are a lot of common Vols fans who believe that it’s Haslam causing the most trouble.

Why are Vols fans suspicious of Jimmy Haslam?

Money, get away
Get a good job with more pay and you’re okay
Money, it’s a gas
Grab that cash with both hands and make a stash
New car, caviar, four star daydream
Think I’ll buy me a football team

Money, by Pink Floyd

Jimmy Haslam is rich beyond comprehension for most of us. He’s the CEO of Pilot Flying J, the 15th-largest private company in the United States. According to Forbes, he’s worth $3.6 billion.

Haslam loves football, but he’s terrible at managing a program. He bought the Cleveland Browns back in 2012 for $990 million. Since that time, Cleveland has been considered the worst franchise in the NFL, finishing dead last in the AFC North every year since Haslam bought the team. Over the past six years, the team has gone 5-11, 4-12, 7-9, 3-13, and 1-15, and they are winless this year. One Browns fan has purchased a permit to hold an 0-16 parade around FirstEnergy Stadium at the conclusion of this season. They are 1-29 in their past 30 games and 4-44 dating back to 2014. It’s the worst 48-game stretch in NFL history. They are not just bad, but historically, terribly bad. People are beginning to seriously wonder whether the No. 1 pick in the NFL Draft this year might refuse to sign with the Browns if they’re the ones to pick him.

Of course, you can’t buy a college football team like you can an NFL team. But you can give a boatload of money to one, and Haslam is a major donor to the University of Tennessee. He was part of three generations of the Haslam family that donated $50 million to the UT College of Business back in 2014.

To my knowledge, there have been no reports of big money boosters causing any serious problems at Tennessee, but it’s no secret that donating large amounts of money earns you certain privileges at the schools to which you donate.

And there are, in fact, some reports that Haslam has been and is involved in important decisions for the athletic department. Jimmy Hyams reported that when the school was hiring someone to replace outgoing athletic director Dave Hart, Haslam was not only on the search committee, but was “the search committee member that pushed for Currie.”

And regarding the current search for a new coach to replace Butch Jones, Mike Griffith recently reported that:

Currie declined to use a search firm, and he has instead been consulting with the family of Vols booster Jimmy Haslam and Tennessee legend Peyton Manning, according to the source.

Griffith also said via Tweet that Manning has merely “been involved” and that Haslam is “at the point.”

Subsequent reports suggest that Haslam’s involvement after last Sunday has been limited. But up until then, at least, a guy who’s owned a terrible team for five years and has given millions of dollars to the University was reportedly involved in some of the most important decisions they make. And so many of those decisions have not gone very well at all.

But does any of that mean Haslam is forcing himself on the University? Not necessarily. Maybe they want his help.

But let me ask you this: Would you?

We’ve already established that the NFL team he’s owned for five years is historically bad, so why would you ask him for advice on football matters?

In addition to that, there’s that not-so-small matter of the current Pilot Flying J scandal. This article is not about that case, so I won’t spend too much time on the details, but here’s the gist: Pilot Flying J, the company of which Jimmy Haslam is CEO, is embroiled in an ongoing fraud case against the company. The FBI and IRS raided the corporate headquarters in 2013, and 14 former employees have already pled guilty. Four more former executives are on trial for conspiracy to commit wire and mail fraud. The company has already paid $92 million in fines (and the board of directors reportedly confessed criminal responsibility in connection therewith), and the company paid another $85 million to settle with customers. So far, Jimmy Haslam himself has not been charged. This week, though, feds began to look into his potential knowledge or involvement based on a recording purportedly showing that he was present at a meeting during which the fraud was allegedly being taught to staff.

None of that is to suggest that Jimmy Haslam himself is guilty of anything, but whether he’s guilty or not is not the point.

The point is this: When you Google Jimmy Haslam’s name right now, what you get is a page full of news associating his name with fraud.

Who in their right mind would think it’s a good idea to send him out on a coaching search to represent a school with its own reputation problem?

Separation of powers

So, when a highly-respected national media member endorses the idea that the real problem at Tennessee was something improperly influencing the athletic director, well, that should get your attention. So should someone as respectable as Bruce Feldman mentioning in an article published this morning that, “there is a lot of in-fighting, finger-pointing and back-stabbing taking place amongst Tennessee brass.”

Does that verify the common fans’ belief that Haslam’s been wielding too much influence over the process? Does it mean a coup is underway among the most influential boosters, and if so, is that a good thing? Is the department finally headed toward stability? Are we possibly at risk of trading one tyrant for another? Or has someone with a white hat finally rode in to save the day?

It’s too early to tell, of course. But it would seem that a re-balancing of power at this time might be a very good thing, even as ugly as it’s been. Especially if whoever ends up in control knows that they are also going to be held accountable by the collective voice of the common fan.