Site icon Gameday on Rocky Top

South Carolina 63 Tennessee 38 – A Bewildering Night

Footballs

A season that has surprised us all saved another one for tonight. And this time, unfortunately, it was not the fun kind.

These things always need the full season to find their proper place, as much as the moment may invite us to do otherwise each week. This post will go up on our front page next to one breaking down historical precedent for one-loss teams in the College Football Playoff. Guilty as charged for spending more time on that than previewing South Carolina. Couldn’t help myself: how often have we gotten to spend real time discussing the playoff?

Those are the tangled emotions tonight: an unbelievable rise for a team we collectively expected to finish 8-4, an unbelievable setup for your closing playoff argument (so we thought), and now an unbelievable result to remove that option from the table.

I wrote last week about the inevitability that had suddenly surrounded watching this team play, the way they coasted past Missouri when the Tigers cut it to four in the third quarter. And then tonight, South Carolina’s offense carried a similar feeling.

Even when Tennessee cut it to four themselves, 35-31 with almost ten minutes to play in the third quarter? So much time for this team, it felt like. But Carolina’s offense again pounced, a nine-play drive with only one third down, and a 42-31 lead. Tennessee attacked again, because that’s what we do, moving the ball to what should’ve been the South Carolina 30. But a small but dangerous truth showed itself again: the only way to stop this offense is to make it go backward, and an offensive pass interference call wiped away the chance for points on that drive.

And then South Carolina converted 3rd-and-20 on their following drive. Then they got another first down on a hands to the face penalty on 3rd-and-8. Then they scored. Then Hendon got hurt.

There are many things about tonight that will ultimately run together; none of them will add up to scenarios where we could’ve won given those set of plays. And that’s a frustration the Vols will have to play themselves past, into the future. Beat Alabama the way we did, and you’ll rightfully believe you can do anything. Allow nine South Carolina touchdowns in ten possessions, and you’ll rightfully be concerned you might be more vulnerable than you realized on any Saturday.

Whether this is the biggest loss since whatever will need more time; for many of the younger persuasion, it will have fewer competitors. For Tennessee, and it seems for Joe Milton, there are still 2022 pages left to write. How will the Vols respond against Vanderbilt? What bowl destination are we looking at now, as we wait to see how the playoff poll responds for the New Year’s Six?

There is still a tremendous opportunity to finish this chapter and have it be not just overwhelmingly positive, but transformational. That the story of this team would not be what they lost, but what they gave themselves – and those who’ll follow them – the opportunity to do. Those last few paragraphs will still be quite meaningful for things to come. And if the Vols can continue to play at a championship-conversation level? They’ll have their chances to learn from this and grow, still early in Heupel’s tenure, by winning games that carry this kind of meaning again.

For those of us of the older-ish persuasion, or at least the middle-aged ones? I find some comfort in remembering times when we were avalanched by Florida’s offense in 1995 and 1996, Nebraska’s in 1997, or Florida & Alabama in 2007…and still turned something profound out of those seasons. No one is mistaking this South Carolina team for those offenses, just as no one would’ve with Alabama’s in 2007. There’s a shock value that feels hard to find the right comparison for tonight.

But I also would’ve said the same about beating Alabama blow-for-blow, not too very long ago. Or being number one, even for a single week.

So now, how will these final few pages be written? Even tonight, I’m eager to see them try again.

Go Vols.

5 5 votes
Article Rating