Site icon Gameday on Rocky Top

Tennessee-Oregon State Four Factors Forecast: Threes vs. Frees?

Jan 16, 2021; Knoxville, Tennessee, USA; Vanderbilt Commodores guard Scotty Pippen Jr. (2) passes the ball against Tennessee Volunteers guard Yves Pons (35) during the first half at Thompson-Boling Arena. Mandatory Credit: Randy Sartin-USA TODAY Sports

Here’s the GRT Four Factors Forecast for Tennessee’s first-round NCAA Tournament game against the Oregon State Beavers Friday afternoon.

What to Watch

It’s important to remind ourselves that season-long identities sometimes go on hiatus come tournament time. Hey, it’s spring. The temperature is going to fluctuate. It’s madness!

Uh-oh:

Oh, good:

Score Prediction

According to that Boyds Bets table I kept referring to in yesterday’s Cinderella post, 5 seeds advance to the second round 64.3% of the time.

Vegas has Tennessee as an 8.5-point favorite, and with an over/under of 130, that works out to something like Tennessee 69, Oregon State 61.

KemPom projects this one as Tennessee 69, Oregon State 62, which results in a 74% chance of winning.

Our Toddler likes the Vols by 9 (Tennessee 68, Oregon State 59).

Details below.


Baseline

Current numbers:

Initial simplified takeaways: The difference in shooting percentages from the floor is negligible, but the Beavers are much better from three. The Vols, however, are much better defensively from inside the arc. Everything else looks pretty even, unless you consider 1.5 rebounds per game an advantage.

Four Factors: Straight-Up

Effective FG%

Conclusion: Okay, so Oregon State is not especially good at shooting the ball. Most like Mississippi and Saint Joseph’s among former Vols’ opponents.

Turnover %

Conclusion: Dudes are stingy when they have the ball. Most like Arkansas, App State, Kansas, and Colorado in this regard.

Offensive Rebound %

Conclusion: Most like Colorado and Cincinnati among prior Tennessee opponents, Oregon State is a merely decent offensive rebounding team.

Free Throw Rate

Conclusion: The Beavers are not bad at getting to the free throw line.

Four Factors: Opponent impact

Effective FG%

Conclusions

Okay, so Tennessee’s season-long identity is that of a team that is only mediocre shooting the ball. The good news is that Oregon State’s shooting defense isn’t any better.

On the other end, Tennessee should have a decided advantage, as the Vols are still bordering on elite in shooting defense, and the Beavers are bordering on bad at hitting shots.

Turnover %

Conclusions

Tennessee has an unnerving tendency to go on turnover sprees. Fortunately, Oregon State isn’t especially adept at forcing turnovers.

When the Beavers have the ball, they don’t tend to turn it over much, but the Vols are professional thieves, so we’ll see how that shakes out.

Offensive Rebounding %

Conclusions

Another big advantage here for the Vols on their end of the court, as they’re pretty good at earning second chances on the offensive glass while the Beavers are not a good defensive rebounding team.

However, it’s the same story under the Beavers’ basket, although not quite as compelling.

Free Throw Rate

Conclusions

Hoo-boy. That’s a nice recipe there, with a Vols squad decent at earning trips to the free throw line going up against an Oregon State team that can’t keep their hands to themselves.

The Beavers get to the stripe at a fair rate as well, but Tennessee’s not going to help them get there.

Go Vols.

5 1 vote
Article Rating